• 2 people like this
  • Education
Recent Updates
  • "Strangely enough, no one lacks imagination more than the robber and the thief: for they cannot possibly imagine how wealth can be obtained by any other means. But their approach leads to life-long guilt, anxiety, tension, if not imprisonment. Yet they display an imagination alien to most of us in their will to frighten or injure others in their quest. This is a purely self-destructive kind of imagination, for the wealth they grab ultimately leads to irreversible unhappiness."
    ---- Excerpts from "I Have Ways Ye Know Not Of, by S;. B. Dyson".
    "Strangely enough, no one lacks imagination more than the robber and the thief: for they cannot possibly imagine how wealth can be obtained by any other means. But their approach leads to life-long guilt, anxiety, tension, if not imprisonment. Yet they display an imagination alien to most of us in their will to frighten or injure others in their quest. This is a purely self-destructive kind of imagination, for the wealth they grab ultimately leads to irreversible unhappiness." ---- Excerpts from "I Have Ways Ye Know Not Of, by S;. B. Dyson".
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • A criminal who thinks he/she is superior to us, will always fails. They're so full of anxiety, stress, and craves to be worshiped, yet no one gives a shit about criminals. Ha ha ha. Quit your thieving, your raping, your murdering ways, then you'll stop having stupid pointless anxiety and stress, idiots. Ha ha ha.
    A criminal who thinks he/she is superior to us, will always fails. They're so full of anxiety, stress, and craves to be worshiped, yet no one gives a shit about criminals. Ha ha ha. Quit your thieving, your raping, your murdering ways, then you'll stop having stupid pointless anxiety and stress, idiots. Ha ha ha.
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The Manson Family.... all cults operates the same way, all gangs operates the same way, all forms of groups that makes themselves the exclusive and keeps outsiders out, isolating themselves and believing they and they alone is the superior, best, supreme, smarter, blah blah... when in reality, they are not so perfect, not so smart, not so supreme, not so superior. No one's PERFECT, idiots. Mafias, gangs, religious cults, communist cults, islam cults, splinter "christian" cults, roman church cults, all kinds of cults, they're all not that different. "Be not yoked with them," Jesus said. So I refused to be yoked with these idiots. Charlie Manson, mohamad, Pol Pot, Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Adi Amin, Kim Jung II (or whatever), Hubbard of Scientology, all these cults operates same way, through FEAR. They imposed FEAR through deaths, tortures, etc blah blah, and thinks they're so superior. They only shows themselves to be stupid, that's all. And lots of clones copies these idiots and thinks they're so superior than the rest of us. Idiots. lol

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118840/?ref_=nv_sr_3?ref_=nv_sr_3
    The Manson Family.... all cults operates the same way, all gangs operates the same way, all forms of groups that makes themselves the exclusive and keeps outsiders out, isolating themselves and believing they and they alone is the superior, best, supreme, smarter, blah blah... when in reality, they are not so perfect, not so smart, not so supreme, not so superior. No one's PERFECT, idiots. Mafias, gangs, religious cults, communist cults, islam cults, splinter "christian" cults, roman church cults, all kinds of cults, they're all not that different. "Be not yoked with them," Jesus said. So I refused to be yoked with these idiots. Charlie Manson, mohamad, Pol Pot, Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Adi Amin, Kim Jung II (or whatever), Hubbard of Scientology, all these cults operates same way, through FEAR. They imposed FEAR through deaths, tortures, etc blah blah, and thinks they're so superior. They only shows themselves to be stupid, that's all. And lots of clones copies these idiots and thinks they're so superior than the rest of us. Idiots. lol https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118840/?ref_=nv_sr_3?ref_=nv_sr_3
    The Manson Family (1997) - IMDb
    Directed by Jim Van Bebber. With Marcelo Games, Marc Pitman, Leslie Orr, Maureen Allisse. A dramatization of the horrific and notorious Manson Family Murders, in the form of super 8 home movies.
    WWW.IMDB.COM
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Charlie Says... what he says goes, and his followers carries out his insane plans, just like all muslims carrying out their dead corpse leader mohamad's murderous plans for all who won't follows their insane crap. Monsters all.

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1759744/?ref_=nv_sr_2?ref_=nv_sr_2
    Charlie Says... what he says goes, and his followers carries out his insane plans, just like all muslims carrying out their dead corpse leader mohamad's murderous plans for all who won't follows their insane crap. Monsters all. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1759744/?ref_=nv_sr_2?ref_=nv_sr_2
    Charlie Says (2018) - IMDb
    Directed by Mary Harron. With Hannah Murray, Matt Smith, Sosie Bacon, Marianne Rendón. The tragic tale of an all-American girl who was transformed into a cold-blooded killer in the summer of 1969.
    WWW.IMDB.COM
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Charlie Manson, typical of narcissist-sociopath, who incites his followers to kill in his name. Exactly like mohmad who incites his followers to kill in his name, put people into slavery, also put children and people into sex slavery, all in the name of the psychotic allah and mohmad and islam and sharia. Monsters all.

    https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0543909/?ref_=nv_sr_1?ref_=nv_sr_1
    Charlie Manson, typical of narcissist-sociopath, who incites his followers to kill in his name. Exactly like mohmad who incites his followers to kill in his name, put people into slavery, also put children and people into sex slavery, all in the name of the psychotic allah and mohmad and islam and sharia. Monsters all. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0543909/?ref_=nv_sr_1?ref_=nv_sr_1
    Charles Manson - IMDb
    Charles Manson, Soundtrack: The Manson Family. Charles Manson is one of the most notorious convicted murderers in American history, though ironically, there is no evidence that he ever killed anyone himself. In 1971, Los Angeles prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi used his "Helter Skelter" theory to successfully convict Manson and several of his female compatriots of seven murders: the Tate-LaBianca ...
    WWW.IMDB.COM
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Stop accepting the criminal muslims, or the entire world will be muslimized, and forever after we will not have any "freedoms", no "rights", no "free will", it will be all criminalized, while only the mohmad'THINK will be the only thing we're forced to think with, no other thinking is allowed.

    Unless we changes and stop accepting the criminal muslims and actually revokes their western citizenship and sends them all back to their hellholes where they came from, the Saudi Arab, all muslims belongs there, they should stay there.

    OR, we will have to KILL all the criminal muslims, there is no other way. When bullies (muslims) rises up, we MUST beat them down, at all costs. History proves this.

    Pakistan was once NOT a muslim country. Many of once muslim countries today was once NOT muslim countries! This FACT proves the truth, muslims are NOT friendly, they are LIARS, THIEVES, and PRETENDERS, all willing to do ANYTHING in order to IMPOSE their sick criminal ideology on everyone, and if anyone won't accepts their sicknesses, then they are killed.

    Why anyone ignores this I don't know. I bides my time and when the criminals are here, I will go to war and I will kill and kill and kill until none are left, or I be bed. Praised be to Jesus, Amen.

    https://mnhopkins.blogspot.com/2019/07/unless-we-change-directiona-chinese.html
    Stop accepting the criminal muslims, or the entire world will be muslimized, and forever after we will not have any "freedoms", no "rights", no "free will", it will be all criminalized, while only the mohmad'THINK will be the only thing we're forced to think with, no other thinking is allowed. Unless we changes and stop accepting the criminal muslims and actually revokes their western citizenship and sends them all back to their hellholes where they came from, the Saudi Arab, all muslims belongs there, they should stay there. OR, we will have to KILL all the criminal muslims, there is no other way. When bullies (muslims) rises up, we MUST beat them down, at all costs. History proves this. Pakistan was once NOT a muslim country. Many of once muslim countries today was once NOT muslim countries! This FACT proves the truth, muslims are NOT friendly, they are LIARS, THIEVES, and PRETENDERS, all willing to do ANYTHING in order to IMPOSE their sick criminal ideology on everyone, and if anyone won't accepts their sicknesses, then they are killed. Why anyone ignores this I don't know. I bides my time and when the criminals are here, I will go to war and I will kill and kill and kill until none are left, or I be bed. Praised be to Jesus, Amen. https://mnhopkins.blogspot.com/2019/07/unless-we-change-directiona-chinese.html
    Unless We Change Direction........A Chinese Proverb
    Ink drawing by Fen Wen Lin Unless we change direction, we are likely to end up where we started. Chinese Proverb
    MNHOPKINS.BLOGSPOT.COM
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Noun: Criminality
    1. The state of being a criminal

    Noun: Criminal
    1. Someone who has committed a crime or has been legally convicted of a crime

    Adjective: Criminal
    1. Bringing or deserving severe rebuke or censure
    "a criminal waste of talent"
    2. Guilty of crime or serious offence
    "criminal in the sight of God and man"
    3. Involving, being or having the nature of a crime
    "a criminal offence"; "criminal abuse"

    Q: What do you call a criminal who made a religion (ideology) of criminality?
    A: a muslim

    Acts of criminality:
    That which was done to people against their will.

    Thus, murder, rape, theft, at the expense of other people, in the name of "ideology", is evil, no matter how much they justifies their acts as claiming it is their "right" or "god-given" or "mohamd-given", it's STILL CRIMINAL AND EVIL.

    Let's not forget that these criminals also rapes animals for their sick pleasures, so yes, they are criminals.

    They understands nothing of "cooperation", "helping each other", instead they only understands their evil acts, "taking by force", life, property, or imposing their sick "ideology" on others by force.

    The only thing given by God is our brains, and it is common sense and right to DEFENDS ourselves, our families, our homes, our city, our state, our country, against these CRIMINALS who would calls it a crime to defend against them.

    It is OUR RIGHT to PROTECT OURSELVES from these criminals.

    No one is above the LAW, but yes, they can change the law and forces people to accept these criminals and their actions, but not anyone with common sense will abides by these unjust MAN-MADE laws that was changed to suit these criminals. Instead, people WILL rises up and defends themselves against these criminals and WILL takes down these criminals no matter where they are.

    One day, the criminals will be defeated. This so Jesus PROMISED, for He already OVERCAME THE WORLD.

    Amen.
    Noun: Criminality 1. The state of being a criminal Noun: Criminal 1. Someone who has committed a crime or has been legally convicted of a crime Adjective: Criminal 1. Bringing or deserving severe rebuke or censure "a criminal waste of talent" 2. Guilty of crime or serious offence "criminal in the sight of God and man" 3. Involving, being or having the nature of a crime "a criminal offence"; "criminal abuse" Q: What do you call a criminal who made a religion (ideology) of criminality? A: a muslim Acts of criminality: That which was done to people against their will. Thus, murder, rape, theft, at the expense of other people, in the name of "ideology", is evil, no matter how much they justifies their acts as claiming it is their "right" or "god-given" or "mohamd-given", it's STILL CRIMINAL AND EVIL. Let's not forget that these criminals also rapes animals for their sick pleasures, so yes, they are criminals. They understands nothing of "cooperation", "helping each other", instead they only understands their evil acts, "taking by force", life, property, or imposing their sick "ideology" on others by force. The only thing given by God is our brains, and it is common sense and right to DEFENDS ourselves, our families, our homes, our city, our state, our country, against these CRIMINALS who would calls it a crime to defend against them. It is OUR RIGHT to PROTECT OURSELVES from these criminals. No one is above the LAW, but yes, they can change the law and forces people to accept these criminals and their actions, but not anyone with common sense will abides by these unjust MAN-MADE laws that was changed to suit these criminals. Instead, people WILL rises up and defends themselves against these criminals and WILL takes down these criminals no matter where they are. One day, the criminals will be defeated. This so Jesus PROMISED, for He already OVERCAME THE WORLD. Amen.
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Barbarians made barbaranism a "religion" ideology of criminality.
    Barbarians made barbaranism a "religion" ideology of criminality.
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The side of Rabindranath Tagore that ‘Liberal Intellectuals’ don’t want you to see: Here is what he thought of Islam

    Quite ostensibly, Tagore was not a proponent of the Hindu Right as we understand it today. However, he was certainly not one of the 'secular intellectual elite' of today either.

    Over time, a certain effort has been made by the intellectual Bengali elite to recast cultural icons of yore into stereotypes that fit perfectly with their own imaginations. In their effort, certain Bengali icons who have greatly influenced Bengali culture have been discarded while others have been fashioned as symbols of the supposed inherent secular Bengali culture.

    In this endeavour, icons like Shyama Prasad Mookherjee and Sri Aurobindo don’t find a place for themselves in the pantheon of Bengali stalwarts while those like Raja Ram Mohan Roy do. However, contrary to what liberals would have us believe, the opinions of such icons did not always conform with their fancy notions.

    Rabindranath Tagore is one such Bengali stalwart. Decades after his death, his songs are still sung and heard by every single Bengali Hindu family. His songs, which capture a variety of human emotions, have an entirely separate category unto themselves. ‘Rabindra Sangeet’ it is called. He is indeed an absolute cultural icon and over time, the Bengali intellectual elite has claimed him to be secular to present the ‘highly refined Bengali culture’ to be in stark contrast with the ‘rustic bigoted North Indian culture’.

    However, was Rabindranath Tagore really secular as the term is understood now? Was he really a deracinated intellectual as most of the Bengali elite is now? Let us discard the notions liberals have fed us and make up our own minds on the basis of the legend’s own words.

    From his works, it is abundantly clear that the great poet was not too fond of Islam and Christianity, to put it mildly. He said of them once, “There are two religions in earth, which have distinct enmity against all other religions. These two are Christianity and Islam. They are not just satisfied with observing their own religions but are determined to destroy all other religions. That’s why the only way to make peace with them is to embrace their religions.” (Original works of Rabindranath Vol. 24, page 375, Vishwa Bharti; 1982.)

    In a letter to Hemantabala Sarkar, written on the 16th of October, 1933, quoted in Bengali weekly ‘Swastika’ on 21-6-1999, he says, “The terrible situation of the country makes my mind restless and I cannot keep silent. Meaningless ritual keeps the Hindus divided into hundred sects. So we are suffering from a series of defeats. We are tired and worn-out by the fortunes by the internal-external enemies. The Muslims are united in religion and rituals. The Bengali Muslims the South Indian Muslims and even the Muslims outside India-all are united. They always stand united in face of danger. The broken and divided Hindus will not be able to combat them. Days are coming when the Hindus will be again humiliated by the Muslims. “You are a mother of children, one day you will die, passing the future of Hindus society on the weak shoulders of your children, but think about their future.”

    Rabindranath Tagore also blamed the Muslim community for the everlasting communal tensions between the two communities. Particularly, he blamed the pan-Islamic identity of the Muslim community and their penchant to put their religion over the nation which he claimed stood in the way of peaceful relations between Hindus and Muslims.

    In an interview with Times of India in 1924, which was quoted by the Hindu intellectual stalwart Sita Ram Goel in his book ‘Muslim Separatism – Causes and Consequences’ (1987), Tagore said, “A very important factor which is making it almost impossible for Hindu-Muslim unity to become an accomplished fact is that the Muslims can not confine their patriotism to any one country. I had frankly asked (the Muslims) whether, in the event of any Mohammedan power invading India, they (Muslims) would stand side by side with their Hindu neighbours to defend their common land. I was not satisfied with the reply I got from them… Even such a man as Mr Mohammad Ali (one of the famous Ali brothers, the leaders of the Khilafat Movement-the compiler) has declared that under no circumstances is it permissible for any Mohammedan, whatever be his country, to stand against any Mohammedan.”

    On another occasion, “Swamy Shraddananda’’, written by Rabindranath in Magh, 1333 Bangabda; compiled in the book ‘Kalantar’, he exhorted the Hindus to shed their weakness. “Weakness harbours sin. So, if the Muslims beat us and we, the Hindus, tolerate this without resistance-then, we will know that it is made possible only by our weakness. For the sake of ourselves and our neighbour Muslims also, we have to discard our weakness. We can appeal to our neighbour Muslims, ‘Please don’t be cruel to us. No religion can be based on genocide’ – but this kind of appeal is nothing, but the weeping of the weak person. When the low pressure is created in the air, a storm comes spontaneously; nobody can stop it for the sake of religion. Similarly, if weakness is cherished and be allowed to exist, torture comes automatically – nobody can stop it.”

    He also harboured a very pessimistic outlook about the future of Hindu-Muslim relation. He went on to add, “Possibly, the Hindus and the Muslims can make a fake friendship to each other for a while, but that cannot last forever. As long as you don’t purify the soil, which grows only thorny shrubs you can not expect any fruit.”

    Rabindranath Tagore, simultaneously, harboured great faith in Hinduism. He said, “When two-three different religions claim that only their own religions are true and all other religions are false, their religions are only ways to Heaven, conflicts cannot be avoided. Thus, fundamentalism tries to abolish all other religions. This is called Bolshevism in religion. Only the path shown by the Hinduism can relieve the world form this meanness.” (Tagore, ‘Aatmaparichapa’ in his book `Parichaya’)

    Of course, Tagore’s intelligence means that his opinions were extremely nuanced and it’s quite impossible to capture the entirety of his worldview in a single article. However, one thing is for certain, Tagore was certainly not the ‘secular hero’ the current Bengali elite imagine him to be. If he said the words now that he did then, the stalwart would be immediately labelled as a Hindutva Bigot.

    To be fair, certain Left-Liberals maintain their honesty in this respect and do already label him as Islamophobic and a bigot. That is indeed worthy of much more appreciation than the attempts to recast the great man into something he was not. Pitamber Kaushik, in an article published in Countercurrents (https://countercurrents.org/2019/05/what-did-rabindranath-tagore-think-about-islam) titled ‘What Did Rabindranath Tagore Think About Islam?’, says “an oft-unnoticed facet of this multiarmed polyglot, is remarkable, that of an undeniable bigot.” He adds, “Albeit Tagore did much to overhaul the exploitative social system and was the harbinger of progressive, modernist thought in Bengal, he was no Namboodripad or Nehru. Averse to the Abrahamic religions, and in spite of all ideological reformist endeavours, Tagore harboured an unmistakably soft spot for Hinduism, his religion of birth and upbringing.”

    One certain Saif Khan, writing for the Left-Liberal website Youth ki Awaaz, placed Tagore in the list of ‘Islamophobic Indians‘ (https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2013/04/indias-islamophobic-icons/). And it is further said, “Tagore’s flawed analogy if repeated by a political leader today would earn him the title of being ‘communal’.” Certain Maulanas, too, claim that Tagore’s ideas are being used to spread hatred against Muslims.

    Tagore was an extremely complicated man born into an extremely complicated era. Unfortunately enough, he became a victim of the newly minted artificially secular regime’s revisionist project. As a consequence, the enormous complexity of the man was reduced to dull shades of black and white and the grandeur of his achievements was reduced to merely a political tool in the hands of vested interests.

    Quite ostensibly, Tagore was not a proponent of the Hindu Right as we understand it today. However, he was certainly not one of the ‘secular intellectual elite’ of today either. More importantly, Tagore’s legacy is not the intellectual property of the current set of deracinated Bengali elite. His music and legacy is cherished by every Indian. When the entire country rises for the National Anthem, they are paying tribute to the nation through a song composed by Tagore. Cultural Icons from the past ought to be celebrated and cherished, to use them as sticks to beat fellow countrymen with is a sheer disgrace.



    https://www.opindia.com/2019/05/the-side-of-rabindranath-tagore-that-liberal-intellectuals-dont-want-you-to-see-here-is-what-he-thought-of-islam/
    The side of Rabindranath Tagore that ‘Liberal Intellectuals’ don’t want you to see: Here is what he thought of Islam Quite ostensibly, Tagore was not a proponent of the Hindu Right as we understand it today. However, he was certainly not one of the 'secular intellectual elite' of today either. Over time, a certain effort has been made by the intellectual Bengali elite to recast cultural icons of yore into stereotypes that fit perfectly with their own imaginations. In their effort, certain Bengali icons who have greatly influenced Bengali culture have been discarded while others have been fashioned as symbols of the supposed inherent secular Bengali culture. In this endeavour, icons like Shyama Prasad Mookherjee and Sri Aurobindo don’t find a place for themselves in the pantheon of Bengali stalwarts while those like Raja Ram Mohan Roy do. However, contrary to what liberals would have us believe, the opinions of such icons did not always conform with their fancy notions. Rabindranath Tagore is one such Bengali stalwart. Decades after his death, his songs are still sung and heard by every single Bengali Hindu family. His songs, which capture a variety of human emotions, have an entirely separate category unto themselves. ‘Rabindra Sangeet’ it is called. He is indeed an absolute cultural icon and over time, the Bengali intellectual elite has claimed him to be secular to present the ‘highly refined Bengali culture’ to be in stark contrast with the ‘rustic bigoted North Indian culture’. However, was Rabindranath Tagore really secular as the term is understood now? Was he really a deracinated intellectual as most of the Bengali elite is now? Let us discard the notions liberals have fed us and make up our own minds on the basis of the legend’s own words. From his works, it is abundantly clear that the great poet was not too fond of Islam and Christianity, to put it mildly. He said of them once, “There are two religions in earth, which have distinct enmity against all other religions. These two are Christianity and Islam. They are not just satisfied with observing their own religions but are determined to destroy all other religions. That’s why the only way to make peace with them is to embrace their religions.” (Original works of Rabindranath Vol. 24, page 375, Vishwa Bharti; 1982.) In a letter to Hemantabala Sarkar, written on the 16th of October, 1933, quoted in Bengali weekly ‘Swastika’ on 21-6-1999, he says, “The terrible situation of the country makes my mind restless and I cannot keep silent. Meaningless ritual keeps the Hindus divided into hundred sects. So we are suffering from a series of defeats. We are tired and worn-out by the fortunes by the internal-external enemies. The Muslims are united in religion and rituals. The Bengali Muslims the South Indian Muslims and even the Muslims outside India-all are united. They always stand united in face of danger. The broken and divided Hindus will not be able to combat them. Days are coming when the Hindus will be again humiliated by the Muslims. “You are a mother of children, one day you will die, passing the future of Hindus society on the weak shoulders of your children, but think about their future.” Rabindranath Tagore also blamed the Muslim community for the everlasting communal tensions between the two communities. Particularly, he blamed the pan-Islamic identity of the Muslim community and their penchant to put their religion over the nation which he claimed stood in the way of peaceful relations between Hindus and Muslims. In an interview with Times of India in 1924, which was quoted by the Hindu intellectual stalwart Sita Ram Goel in his book ‘Muslim Separatism – Causes and Consequences’ (1987), Tagore said, “A very important factor which is making it almost impossible for Hindu-Muslim unity to become an accomplished fact is that the Muslims can not confine their patriotism to any one country. I had frankly asked (the Muslims) whether, in the event of any Mohammedan power invading India, they (Muslims) would stand side by side with their Hindu neighbours to defend their common land. I was not satisfied with the reply I got from them… Even such a man as Mr Mohammad Ali (one of the famous Ali brothers, the leaders of the Khilafat Movement-the compiler) has declared that under no circumstances is it permissible for any Mohammedan, whatever be his country, to stand against any Mohammedan.” On another occasion, “Swamy Shraddananda’’, written by Rabindranath in Magh, 1333 Bangabda; compiled in the book ‘Kalantar’, he exhorted the Hindus to shed their weakness. “Weakness harbours sin. So, if the Muslims beat us and we, the Hindus, tolerate this without resistance-then, we will know that it is made possible only by our weakness. For the sake of ourselves and our neighbour Muslims also, we have to discard our weakness. We can appeal to our neighbour Muslims, ‘Please don’t be cruel to us. No religion can be based on genocide’ – but this kind of appeal is nothing, but the weeping of the weak person. When the low pressure is created in the air, a storm comes spontaneously; nobody can stop it for the sake of religion. Similarly, if weakness is cherished and be allowed to exist, torture comes automatically – nobody can stop it.” He also harboured a very pessimistic outlook about the future of Hindu-Muslim relation. He went on to add, “Possibly, the Hindus and the Muslims can make a fake friendship to each other for a while, but that cannot last forever. As long as you don’t purify the soil, which grows only thorny shrubs you can not expect any fruit.” Rabindranath Tagore, simultaneously, harboured great faith in Hinduism. He said, “When two-three different religions claim that only their own religions are true and all other religions are false, their religions are only ways to Heaven, conflicts cannot be avoided. Thus, fundamentalism tries to abolish all other religions. This is called Bolshevism in religion. Only the path shown by the Hinduism can relieve the world form this meanness.” (Tagore, ‘Aatmaparichapa’ in his book `Parichaya’) Of course, Tagore’s intelligence means that his opinions were extremely nuanced and it’s quite impossible to capture the entirety of his worldview in a single article. However, one thing is for certain, Tagore was certainly not the ‘secular hero’ the current Bengali elite imagine him to be. If he said the words now that he did then, the stalwart would be immediately labelled as a Hindutva Bigot. To be fair, certain Left-Liberals maintain their honesty in this respect and do already label him as Islamophobic and a bigot. That is indeed worthy of much more appreciation than the attempts to recast the great man into something he was not. Pitamber Kaushik, in an article published in Countercurrents (https://countercurrents.org/2019/05/what-did-rabindranath-tagore-think-about-islam) titled ‘What Did Rabindranath Tagore Think About Islam?’, says “an oft-unnoticed facet of this multiarmed polyglot, is remarkable, that of an undeniable bigot.” He adds, “Albeit Tagore did much to overhaul the exploitative social system and was the harbinger of progressive, modernist thought in Bengal, he was no Namboodripad or Nehru. Averse to the Abrahamic religions, and in spite of all ideological reformist endeavours, Tagore harboured an unmistakably soft spot for Hinduism, his religion of birth and upbringing.” One certain Saif Khan, writing for the Left-Liberal website Youth ki Awaaz, placed Tagore in the list of ‘Islamophobic Indians‘ (https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2013/04/indias-islamophobic-icons/). And it is further said, “Tagore’s flawed analogy if repeated by a political leader today would earn him the title of being ‘communal’.” Certain Maulanas, too, claim that Tagore’s ideas are being used to spread hatred against Muslims. Tagore was an extremely complicated man born into an extremely complicated era. Unfortunately enough, he became a victim of the newly minted artificially secular regime’s revisionist project. As a consequence, the enormous complexity of the man was reduced to dull shades of black and white and the grandeur of his achievements was reduced to merely a political tool in the hands of vested interests. Quite ostensibly, Tagore was not a proponent of the Hindu Right as we understand it today. However, he was certainly not one of the ‘secular intellectual elite’ of today either. More importantly, Tagore’s legacy is not the intellectual property of the current set of deracinated Bengali elite. His music and legacy is cherished by every Indian. When the entire country rises for the National Anthem, they are paying tribute to the nation through a song composed by Tagore. Cultural Icons from the past ought to be celebrated and cherished, to use them as sticks to beat fellow countrymen with is a sheer disgrace. https://www.opindia.com/2019/05/the-side-of-rabindranath-tagore-that-liberal-intellectuals-dont-want-you-to-see-here-is-what-he-thought-of-islam/
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0306825554/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0306825554&linkCode=as2&tag=raymondibrahi-20&linkId=0f925201768b161ae319879bb3fdf1d7
    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0306825554/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0306825554&linkCode=as2&tag=raymondibrahi-20&linkId=0f925201768b161ae319879bb3fdf1d7
    Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West: Raymond Ibrahim, Victor Davis Hanson: 9780306825552: Amazon.com: Books
    Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West [Raymond Ibrahim, Victor Davis Hanson] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. A sweeping history of the often-violent conflict between Islam and the West, shedding a revealing light on current hostilities The West and Islam--the sword and scimitar--have clashed since the mid-seventh century
    WWW.AMAZON.COM
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
More Stories