• we don't need no education. A double negative can be positive.
    we don't need no education. A double negative can be positive.
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/32570-university-of-alabama-returns-largest-donation-ever-citing-donor-interference?vsmaid=4924&vcid=1585
    https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/32570-university-of-alabama-returns-largest-donation-ever-citing-donor-interference?vsmaid=4924&vcid=1585
    University of Alabama Returns Largest Donation Ever, Citing Donor Interference
    The University of Alabama returned the largest donation it had ever received to a Florida businessman who recently urged a boycott of the school because Florida enacted a law banning almost all abortions. by Michael Tennant
    WWW.THENEWAMERICAN.COM
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Tulsi Lit Up This Iowa Democratic Event With The TRUTH
    https://youtu.be/-ylgQOF0-zs
    Tulsi Gabbard 6/11/19
    We must bend the arc of history away from war & toward peace, prosperity, opportunity, & justice for all.

    I will take the dollars now WASTED on regime change wars, new cold war & nuclear war, & invest in:

    Medicare for all,
    Protect environment,
    Education,
    Rebuild infrastructure, and more...
    Tulsi Lit Up This Iowa Democratic Event With The TRUTH https://youtu.be/-ylgQOF0-zs Tulsi Gabbard 6/11/19 We must bend the arc of history away from war & toward peace, prosperity, opportunity, & justice for all. I will take the dollars now WASTED on regime change wars, new cold war & nuclear war, & invest in: Medicare for all, Protect environment, Education, Rebuild infrastructure, and more...
    Tulsi lit up this Iowa Dem event with the TRUTH
    We must bend the arc of history away from war & toward peace, prosperity, opportunity, & justice for all. I will take the $ now WASTED on regime change wars,...
    YouTube
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Sex education: The clash of LGBT and religious rights – BBC Newsnight

    #uk #islam #lgbt #bbc
    https://youtu.be/RKdzYmVSMus
    Sex education: The clash of LGBT and religious rights – BBC Newsnight #uk #islam #lgbt #bbc https://youtu.be/RKdzYmVSMus
    Sex education: The clash of LGBT and religious rights – BBC Newsnight
    How do we balance the secular norms of an inclusive society with religious freedoms? Subscribe to our channel here: https://goo.gl/31Q53F LGBT and religious ...
    YouTube
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • This is what many schools are now using for sex education classes!
    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/146189.S_E_X_

    #PARRENTAL_GUIDANCE_REQUIRED!
    This is what many schools are now using for sex education classes! https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/146189.S_E_X_ #PARRENTAL_GUIDANCE_REQUIRED!
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • LIBERALS ARE ELECTION MEDDLING

    Bill C-33 and Bill C-76
    This enactment amends the Canada Elections Act to
    remove limitations on public education and information activities conducted by the Chief Electoral Officer; (a)
    establish a Register of Future Electors in which Canadian citizens 14 to 17 years of age may consent to be included; (b)
    authorize the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to provide the Chief Electoral Officer with information about permanent residents and foreign nationals for the purpose of updating the Register of Electors; (c)
    remove the prohibition on the Chief Electoral Officer authorizing the notice of confirmation of registration (commonly known as a “voter information card”) as identification; (d)
    replace, in the context of voter identification, the option of attestation for residence with an option of vouching for identity and residence; (e)
    remove two limitations on voting by non-resident electors: the requirement that they have been residing outside Canada for less than five consecutive years, and the requirement that they intend to return to Canada to resume residence in the future; and (f)
    relocate the Commissioner of Canada Elections to within the Office of the Chief Electoral Officer, and provide that the Commissioner is to be appointed by the Chief Electoral Officer, after consultation with the Director of Public Prosecutions, for a non-renewable term of 10 years. (g)
    In addition, the enactment contains transitional provisions and makes consequential amendments to other Acts.

    The sponsor of this bill is none other than Maryam Monsef, we know who this person is the one who lied on her citizenship to gain access to Canada.
    It is no surprise that the social media giants, jumped at the chance to be involved in the Canadian elections.
    When elections Canada announced “ the digital charter” google,face book , twitter, and micro-soft jumped at the chance to join. What would we call this, when elections Canada which is under the control the government is involving the social media to influence young voters to vote for in this case the liberals.
    They have spent 650 million dollars to sway the public to vote for them, this is called election meddling. We know the track record of the liberal government with the truth as well as their transparency of funds, we also are aware of the social media’s record for spreading lies and fake news.
    If this is allowed by the Canadian public, it will go down as the most corrupted elections in Canadian history.
    Canadians who are registered and receive a voter card are more informed about their options, whereas younger voters are less likely to take the time to vote. This is the primary reason for the digital campaign focused on the younger voters, this is not acceptable because of the bias views both by the liberals and social media.
    Elections Canada under the guidance of the liberal government states they are trying to reach the young voters.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-elections-canada-hires-social-media-influencers-to-get-out-the-youth/
    https://openparliament.ca/bills/42-1/C-33/
    https://openparliament.ca/bills/42-1/C-76/
    https://youtu.be/uq4xw8vg5eM
    LIBERALS ARE ELECTION MEDDLING Bill C-33 and Bill C-76 This enactment amends the Canada Elections Act to remove limitations on public education and information activities conducted by the Chief Electoral Officer; (a) establish a Register of Future Electors in which Canadian citizens 14 to 17 years of age may consent to be included; (b) authorize the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to provide the Chief Electoral Officer with information about permanent residents and foreign nationals for the purpose of updating the Register of Electors; (c) remove the prohibition on the Chief Electoral Officer authorizing the notice of confirmation of registration (commonly known as a “voter information card”) as identification; (d) replace, in the context of voter identification, the option of attestation for residence with an option of vouching for identity and residence; (e) remove two limitations on voting by non-resident electors: the requirement that they have been residing outside Canada for less than five consecutive years, and the requirement that they intend to return to Canada to resume residence in the future; and (f) relocate the Commissioner of Canada Elections to within the Office of the Chief Electoral Officer, and provide that the Commissioner is to be appointed by the Chief Electoral Officer, after consultation with the Director of Public Prosecutions, for a non-renewable term of 10 years. (g) In addition, the enactment contains transitional provisions and makes consequential amendments to other Acts. The sponsor of this bill is none other than Maryam Monsef, we know who this person is the one who lied on her citizenship to gain access to Canada. It is no surprise that the social media giants, jumped at the chance to be involved in the Canadian elections. When elections Canada announced “ the digital charter” google,face book , twitter, and micro-soft jumped at the chance to join. What would we call this, when elections Canada which is under the control the government is involving the social media to influence young voters to vote for in this case the liberals. They have spent 650 million dollars to sway the public to vote for them, this is called election meddling. We know the track record of the liberal government with the truth as well as their transparency of funds, we also are aware of the social media’s record for spreading lies and fake news. If this is allowed by the Canadian public, it will go down as the most corrupted elections in Canadian history. Canadians who are registered and receive a voter card are more informed about their options, whereas younger voters are less likely to take the time to vote. This is the primary reason for the digital campaign focused on the younger voters, this is not acceptable because of the bias views both by the liberals and social media. Elections Canada under the guidance of the liberal government states they are trying to reach the young voters. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-elections-canada-hires-social-media-influencers-to-get-out-the-youth/ https://openparliament.ca/bills/42-1/C-33/ https://openparliament.ca/bills/42-1/C-76/ https://youtu.be/uq4xw8vg5eM
    Elections Canada hires social-media ‘influencers’ to get out the youth vote
    Social media stars required to sign pledge of non-partisanship during 2019 campaign
    WWW.THEGLOBEANDMAIL.COM
    0 Comments 0 Shares

  • Actions
    GERMANY REPORT

    EATING NRW DEN 07.06.2019

    TIME 18 O'CLOCK 58 MIN.

    GERMANY
    EATING NRW STEEL
    BERGMANN FIELD "SMALL ISTANBUL"
    START OF NO GO ZONE
    REPORT 07.06.2019
    LIVELY AFTER FUSE! OK !
    to 1) (TRUTH OR NOT TRUTH CONDITION BY TRANCE OF THE ILLUMINATI OF THE FREEMASON SATANIST SECRET ISLAM)
    THE MANIPULATION IN THE NIGHT OF YESTERDAY ADDITORS WAS REALLY COME TO THE DECISION BETWEEN GOOD AND EVIL AT THE END OF NIGHT VARIOUS SHAPES WERE PRESENTED AND HARD FOR ME THE ISLAM VELVET ROTHSCHILD DEMANDED I WILL SERVE SATAN IF SATAN IS MY FATHER I DECIDED AGAIN AND SAID SATAN DO NOT WIN THEN THEN HE WAS SHOWN TO ME AND HE SAID THEN START TO PRAYER AND CLOSE WITH THE SATANIAN LIFE FROM ALSO AGAINST A FORCED EXERCISE FROM ISLAM IF I WOULD FIRST ONCE PRAY I FIRST TO ITSELF AND THAT IS MY DECISION ME AM NO RELIGIOUS MAN AND NO BET BROTHER I AM LIKE I AM AND I LIVE LIKE I AM EITHER GOD JESUS TAKES ME AS I AM OR NOT TAKEN TO TODAY NIGHT AGAIN WITH DARK PROGRAMMING AND CONVERSION TRY TO WOMAN ONLY AFTER I MY BED KNIFE WHAT I ALWAYS IN THE HAND HAVE, AFTER THE OUTLINE OF THE TARGET FROM THE VISIBLE LIGHT TO N EHMEN BADICHEN FAST SEEING HELPS THEREFORE THOUGHT HAVE DEDICATED TO THE PRESENT TO HERE I CAN RECONSTRUCT THIS FROM THE MEMORY I MUST HAVE SETTED AGAIN WHAT STILL HAPPENED
    REPORTING CHILDHOOD SOUL SELLING AS ALREADY MENTIONED TO MY SOUL THROUGH A BLACK SOUL AND FROM THE DATE I WAS DEFINITELY ONLY IN THE WORLD I SAID THAT TO MY CYCLES MY PARENTS IF THEY WANTED TO KILL ME AGAIN, I WAS BROKEN AS HALF ALIVE OLD CABIN LOCKED AND THE PRODUCER SCHRIE I DO IGNITION THE CABIN NOW I HAD SEVERAL ACCIDENTS OF WHICH I SAID NOTHING BECAUSE I WAS SPILLED I WAS REALLY ONLY IN THE WORLD MY LUCK WAS SIMPLY AWAY THE PRODUCER HAD ONLY ONE NECK ON ME ALSO EGAL IF I DO NOT DO ANYTHING, I WAS AN EMERGENCY I DISTANCED ME MORE AND MORE YOU WILL TAKE ME IN SWITZERLAND AND JUST LET ME BACK IN THE MOUNTAINS OFF I SO LITTLE AS LITTLE AS I WAS BACK A BLACK DRESSED MAN THAT APPEARED AS ACKERMAN SAID TO MY PRODUCERS YOU TAKE YOUR DUMP AGAIN WITH ME AND THE COMMERCIAL PLAY WAS CONTINUED YOU SAID IC H BIN SATAN AND YOUR MOTHER IS MEDUSA I UNDERSTAND THAT NOT IN PUBLICITY YOU WERE ALWAYS THE WORKING PARENTS AT HOME, CONTINUE TO CONTINUE ME THIS IS THE DESCRIPTION BEFORE MY 6 YEAR OF LIFE AND EDUCATION THERE ARE STILL MANY DETAILS BUT I DO NOT WISH MY DOPPELGER TO EASY TO MAKE I WRITE MORNING FURTHER
    TILL TOMORROW SO GOD WANTS AND GOD HAS GRACE

    Aktionen
    DEUTSCHLAND BERICHT

    ESSEN NRW DEN 07.06.2019

    ZEIT 18 UHR 58 MIN.

    DEUTSCHLAND
    ESSEN NRW STAHL
    BERGMANN FELD "SMALL ISTANBUL"
    ANFANG EINER NO GO ZONE
    BERICHT 07.06.2019
    LEBENDIGE NACH SICHERUNG! OK !
    zu 1) (WAHRHEIT ODER NICHT WAHRHEITSBEDINGUNG DURCH TRANCE DER ILLUMINATI DES FREIMAURER-SATANISTEN-SECRET-ISLAM)
    DIE MANIPULATION IN DER NACHT VON GESTERN NACHTRAG ES WAR AM ENDE DER NACHT WIRKLICH ZUR ENTSCHEIDUNG ZWISCHEN GUT UND BÖSE GEKOMMEN VERSCHIEDENE FORMEN WURDEN DARGESTELLT UND FÜR MICH HART ZU ENTSCHEIDEN DER ISLAM SAMT ROTHSCHILD FORDERTE ICH SOLLE SATAN DIENEN DENN SATAN SEI MEIN VATER ICH ENTSCHIED MICH DAGEGEN UND SAGTE SATAN DÜRFE NICHT GEWINNEN DANN WURDE MIR GOTT GEZEIGT UND ER SAGTE DANN FANG AN ZU BETEN UND SCHLIEẞE MIT DEM SATANISCHEN LEBEN AB AUCH WIEDER EINE ZWANGS MAẞNAHME VOM ISLAM WENN ICH ERST EINMAL BETEN WÜRDE FÄNDE ICH ZU IHNEN ZULETZT UND DAS IST MEINE ENTSCHEIDUNG ICH BIN KEIN FROMMER MANN UND KEIN BET BRUDER ICH BIN WIE ICH BIN UND ICH LEBE WIE ICH BIN ENTWEDER NIMMT GOTT JESUS MICH SO WIE ICH BIN ODER NICHT ZUR HEUTIGEN NACHT WIEDER GEQUÄLT MIT SCHWULER PROGRAMIERUNG UND UMBAU VERSUCHEN ZUR FRAU ERST NACHDEM ICH MEIN BETT MESSER WAS ICH BEIM SCHLAFEN IMMER IN DER HAND HABE MEHRMALS NACH DEN UMRISSEN DIE SICH BEI DER TARNUNG AUS DEM SICHTBAREN LICHT ZU NEHMEN ABZEICHNETEN SCHNELLES SEHEN HILFT DABEI GEWORFEN HABE VERZOG SICH DER ANWESENDE BIS HIER HIN KANN ICH DAS AUS DEM GEDÄCHTNIS REKONSTRUIEREN ICH MUSS DAS NOCH MAL SETZEN LASSEN WAS NOCH GESCHAH
    BERICHT KINDHEIT SEELEN VERKAUF WIE SCHON ERWÄHNT WURDE MIR MEINE SEELE DURCH EINE SCHWARZE SEELE GETAUSCHT UND AB DEM ZEITPUNKT WAR ICH DEFINITIV ALLEINE AUF DER WELT ICH MERKTE DAS AN MEINEN GESCHWISTERN MEINEN ELTERN DENN SIE VERSUCHTEN MICH MEHRMALS ZU TÖTEN ICH WURDE SO HALB LEBENDIG BEGRABEN I EINEN ALTEN SCHRANK GESPERRT UND DER ERZEUGER SCHRIE ICH ZÜNDE DEN SCHRANK JETZT AN ICH HATTE MEHRERE UNFÄLLE VON DENEN ICH NICHTS SAGTE WEIL ICH DANN VERPRÜGELT WURDE ICH WAR WIRKLICH ALLEINE AUF DER WELT MEIN GLÜCK WAR EINFACH WEG DER ERZEUGER HATTE NUR NOCH EINEN HALS AUF MICH EGAL AUCH WENN ICH NICHTS ANSTELLTE BEKAM ICH EINE GEKNALLT ICH DISTANZIERTE MICH IMMER MEHR SIE FUHREN MICH IN DIE SCHWEIZ UND LIEẞEN MICH IN DEN BERGEN EINFACH ZURÜCK FUHREN WEG ICH LIEF SO KLEIN WIE ICH WAR HINTERHER EIN SCHWARZ GEKLEIDETER MANN DER SICH ALS ACKERMANN VORSTELLTE SAGTE ZU MEINEN ERZEUGERN IHR NEHMT EUREN DRECK WIEDER MIT ICH STIEG EIN UND DAS VERWIRRSPIEL WURDE FORT GESETZT SIE SAGTEN ICH BIN SATAN UND DEINE MUTTER IST MEDUSA ICH VERSTAND DAS NICHT IN DER ÖFFENTLICHKEIT WAREN SIE STETS DIE BESORGTEN ELTERN ZUHAUSE QUÄLTEN SIE MICH WEITER DAS IST DIE BESCHREIBUNG VOR MEINEM 6 LEBENSJAHR UND DER EINSCHULUNG ES GIBT DA NOCH VIELE DETAILS ABER ICH WILL ES MEINEM DOPPELGÄNGER NICHT ZU EINFACH MACHEN ICH SCHREIBE MORGEN WEITER
    BIS MORGEN SO GOTT WILL UND GOTT GNADE HAT

    Teilen
    Emoji
    Actions GERMANY REPORT EATING NRW DEN 07.06.2019 TIME 18 O'CLOCK 58 MIN. GERMANY EATING NRW STEEL BERGMANN FIELD "SMALL ISTANBUL" START OF NO GO ZONE REPORT 07.06.2019 LIVELY AFTER FUSE! OK ! to 1) (TRUTH OR NOT TRUTH CONDITION BY TRANCE OF THE ILLUMINATI OF THE FREEMASON SATANIST SECRET ISLAM) THE MANIPULATION IN THE NIGHT OF YESTERDAY ADDITORS WAS REALLY COME TO THE DECISION BETWEEN GOOD AND EVIL AT THE END OF NIGHT VARIOUS SHAPES WERE PRESENTED AND HARD FOR ME THE ISLAM VELVET ROTHSCHILD DEMANDED I WILL SERVE SATAN IF SATAN IS MY FATHER I DECIDED AGAIN AND SAID SATAN DO NOT WIN THEN THEN HE WAS SHOWN TO ME AND HE SAID THEN START TO PRAYER AND CLOSE WITH THE SATANIAN LIFE FROM ALSO AGAINST A FORCED EXERCISE FROM ISLAM IF I WOULD FIRST ONCE PRAY I FIRST TO ITSELF AND THAT IS MY DECISION ME AM NO RELIGIOUS MAN AND NO BET BROTHER I AM LIKE I AM AND I LIVE LIKE I AM EITHER GOD JESUS TAKES ME AS I AM OR NOT TAKEN TO TODAY NIGHT AGAIN WITH DARK PROGRAMMING AND CONVERSION TRY TO WOMAN ONLY AFTER I MY BED KNIFE WHAT I ALWAYS IN THE HAND HAVE, AFTER THE OUTLINE OF THE TARGET FROM THE VISIBLE LIGHT TO N EHMEN BADICHEN FAST SEEING HELPS THEREFORE THOUGHT HAVE DEDICATED TO THE PRESENT TO HERE I CAN RECONSTRUCT THIS FROM THE MEMORY I MUST HAVE SETTED AGAIN WHAT STILL HAPPENED REPORTING CHILDHOOD SOUL SELLING AS ALREADY MENTIONED TO MY SOUL THROUGH A BLACK SOUL AND FROM THE DATE I WAS DEFINITELY ONLY IN THE WORLD I SAID THAT TO MY CYCLES MY PARENTS IF THEY WANTED TO KILL ME AGAIN, I WAS BROKEN AS HALF ALIVE OLD CABIN LOCKED AND THE PRODUCER SCHRIE I DO IGNITION THE CABIN NOW I HAD SEVERAL ACCIDENTS OF WHICH I SAID NOTHING BECAUSE I WAS SPILLED I WAS REALLY ONLY IN THE WORLD MY LUCK WAS SIMPLY AWAY THE PRODUCER HAD ONLY ONE NECK ON ME ALSO EGAL IF I DO NOT DO ANYTHING, I WAS AN EMERGENCY I DISTANCED ME MORE AND MORE YOU WILL TAKE ME IN SWITZERLAND AND JUST LET ME BACK IN THE MOUNTAINS OFF I SO LITTLE AS LITTLE AS I WAS BACK A BLACK DRESSED MAN THAT APPEARED AS ACKERMAN SAID TO MY PRODUCERS YOU TAKE YOUR DUMP AGAIN WITH ME AND THE COMMERCIAL PLAY WAS CONTINUED YOU SAID IC H BIN SATAN AND YOUR MOTHER IS MEDUSA I UNDERSTAND THAT NOT IN PUBLICITY YOU WERE ALWAYS THE WORKING PARENTS AT HOME, CONTINUE TO CONTINUE ME THIS IS THE DESCRIPTION BEFORE MY 6 YEAR OF LIFE AND EDUCATION THERE ARE STILL MANY DETAILS BUT I DO NOT WISH MY DOPPELGER TO EASY TO MAKE I WRITE MORNING FURTHER TILL TOMORROW SO GOD WANTS AND GOD HAS GRACE Aktionen DEUTSCHLAND BERICHT ESSEN NRW DEN 07.06.2019 ZEIT 18 UHR 58 MIN. DEUTSCHLAND ESSEN NRW STAHL BERGMANN FELD "SMALL ISTANBUL" ANFANG EINER NO GO ZONE BERICHT 07.06.2019 LEBENDIGE NACH SICHERUNG! OK ! zu 1) (WAHRHEIT ODER NICHT WAHRHEITSBEDINGUNG DURCH TRANCE DER ILLUMINATI DES FREIMAURER-SATANISTEN-SECRET-ISLAM) DIE MANIPULATION IN DER NACHT VON GESTERN NACHTRAG ES WAR AM ENDE DER NACHT WIRKLICH ZUR ENTSCHEIDUNG ZWISCHEN GUT UND BÖSE GEKOMMEN VERSCHIEDENE FORMEN WURDEN DARGESTELLT UND FÜR MICH HART ZU ENTSCHEIDEN DER ISLAM SAMT ROTHSCHILD FORDERTE ICH SOLLE SATAN DIENEN DENN SATAN SEI MEIN VATER ICH ENTSCHIED MICH DAGEGEN UND SAGTE SATAN DÜRFE NICHT GEWINNEN DANN WURDE MIR GOTT GEZEIGT UND ER SAGTE DANN FANG AN ZU BETEN UND SCHLIEẞE MIT DEM SATANISCHEN LEBEN AB AUCH WIEDER EINE ZWANGS MAẞNAHME VOM ISLAM WENN ICH ERST EINMAL BETEN WÜRDE FÄNDE ICH ZU IHNEN ZULETZT UND DAS IST MEINE ENTSCHEIDUNG ICH BIN KEIN FROMMER MANN UND KEIN BET BRUDER ICH BIN WIE ICH BIN UND ICH LEBE WIE ICH BIN ENTWEDER NIMMT GOTT JESUS MICH SO WIE ICH BIN ODER NICHT ZUR HEUTIGEN NACHT WIEDER GEQUÄLT MIT SCHWULER PROGRAMIERUNG UND UMBAU VERSUCHEN ZUR FRAU ERST NACHDEM ICH MEIN BETT MESSER WAS ICH BEIM SCHLAFEN IMMER IN DER HAND HABE MEHRMALS NACH DEN UMRISSEN DIE SICH BEI DER TARNUNG AUS DEM SICHTBAREN LICHT ZU NEHMEN ABZEICHNETEN SCHNELLES SEHEN HILFT DABEI GEWORFEN HABE VERZOG SICH DER ANWESENDE BIS HIER HIN KANN ICH DAS AUS DEM GEDÄCHTNIS REKONSTRUIEREN ICH MUSS DAS NOCH MAL SETZEN LASSEN WAS NOCH GESCHAH BERICHT KINDHEIT SEELEN VERKAUF WIE SCHON ERWÄHNT WURDE MIR MEINE SEELE DURCH EINE SCHWARZE SEELE GETAUSCHT UND AB DEM ZEITPUNKT WAR ICH DEFINITIV ALLEINE AUF DER WELT ICH MERKTE DAS AN MEINEN GESCHWISTERN MEINEN ELTERN DENN SIE VERSUCHTEN MICH MEHRMALS ZU TÖTEN ICH WURDE SO HALB LEBENDIG BEGRABEN I EINEN ALTEN SCHRANK GESPERRT UND DER ERZEUGER SCHRIE ICH ZÜNDE DEN SCHRANK JETZT AN ICH HATTE MEHRERE UNFÄLLE VON DENEN ICH NICHTS SAGTE WEIL ICH DANN VERPRÜGELT WURDE ICH WAR WIRKLICH ALLEINE AUF DER WELT MEIN GLÜCK WAR EINFACH WEG DER ERZEUGER HATTE NUR NOCH EINEN HALS AUF MICH EGAL AUCH WENN ICH NICHTS ANSTELLTE BEKAM ICH EINE GEKNALLT ICH DISTANZIERTE MICH IMMER MEHR SIE FUHREN MICH IN DIE SCHWEIZ UND LIEẞEN MICH IN DEN BERGEN EINFACH ZURÜCK FUHREN WEG ICH LIEF SO KLEIN WIE ICH WAR HINTERHER EIN SCHWARZ GEKLEIDETER MANN DER SICH ALS ACKERMANN VORSTELLTE SAGTE ZU MEINEN ERZEUGERN IHR NEHMT EUREN DRECK WIEDER MIT ICH STIEG EIN UND DAS VERWIRRSPIEL WURDE FORT GESETZT SIE SAGTEN ICH BIN SATAN UND DEINE MUTTER IST MEDUSA ICH VERSTAND DAS NICHT IN DER ÖFFENTLICHKEIT WAREN SIE STETS DIE BESORGTEN ELTERN ZUHAUSE QUÄLTEN SIE MICH WEITER DAS IST DIE BESCHREIBUNG VOR MEINEM 6 LEBENSJAHR UND DER EINSCHULUNG ES GIBT DA NOCH VIELE DETAILS ABER ICH WILL ES MEINEM DOPPELGÄNGER NICHT ZU EINFACH MACHEN ICH SCHREIBE MORGEN WEITER BIS MORGEN SO GOTT WILL UND GOTT GNADE HAT Teilen Emoji
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Bills criminalizing abortion as murder and rejecting the authority of the courts to say otherwise have been introduced in the state legislatures of Oklahoma, Indiana, Texas, Idaho, and Washington.

    Due to errant Constitutional understanding, most Republican and pro-life leaders oppose such bills, calling them unconstitutional. They claim that Roe v Wade is the law of the land and, while they want to stop the killing, unconditional submission to whatever the Supreme Court says is required of them.

    This sentiment is terribly mistaken. We’ll address it quickly before moving on to the primary concern; namely, what would happen if a bill abolishing abortion were passed and signed into law? Would Oklahoma or Texas be able to successfully enforce it?

    Can We Lawfully Resist the Courts?

    First, let’s examine the Constitutional question. Is the Supreme Court infallible in its opinions? Must they always be obeyed? Earlier this month, Daniel Horowitz at Conservative Reviewposed the question to conservatives: “If a judge ordered Trump to resign, would that be the law?” He detailed the many ways in which the lower courts are, in effect, giving Barack Obama a third term by treating his executive actions as if they were the Constitution itself. He proceeded to ask conservatives whether there was a bridge too far that the courts could possibly cross at which point conservatives would take action.

    If the last half-century is an indicator, the answer is no. Conservatives have been willing to tolerate any opinion from the the courts, up to and including rulings that have directly caused more than 61 million killings.

    How about the Dred Scott ruling, where the Court stated that black men and women are not people but are property? How about the Buck decision in 1927 in which our (in)justices declared that the Federal government could sterilize Americans against their consent? As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes opined, “Three generations of imbeciles is enough.”

    Such rulings as these are wrong, and further, they are evil. Are the states and the people bound by them? Writing to early judicial supremacist Charles Jarvis, Thomas Jefferson addressed this exact question.

    “You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps…. Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.”

    The courts are often wrong. They are often absurdly wrong. Fortunately, they’ve not been given the authority of a single tribunal with ultimate power over constitutional interpretation. When they abuse their office, it is both the right and duty of the other branches of government, as well as state and local governments, to check them. This has not been happening for over 100 years, thus the secular progressives have effectively used the rogue courts as their vehicle to circumvent our democratic processes and impose their ideology upon the states. As Pastor and author Matt Trewhella has said, the courts have created “social transformation without representation.” Appointing conservative justices has done little to reign in these abuses as generations have been taught a false understanding of judicial supremacy, ingraining the idea even in most conservatives.

    There have been and presently are many examples of state and local governments applying proper checks and balances to the abuses of the Federal government. Many northern Statesdefied both Federal court opinion (Dred Scott) and Federal Law (the Fugitive Slave Act) 150 years ago. We celebrate them as heroes for their courage. In fact, this was the soil from which the Republican party sprung into being.

    Today, over 20 states are now defying Federal law over recreational marijuana usage. The Federal government under both Trump and Obama has stood down and not enforced those federal prohibitions. Other federal action on issues ranging from immigration, to health care, to environmental regulations, to gun control have already been nullified in numerous states with very little push back from D.C. Would the feds do the same if a state defied Roe and asserted their state sovereignty to protect innocent human beings in the womb? We don’t know.

    We do know that pro-life Republicans currently have total control of 22 States – total control meaning they have majorities in both the State House and Senate as well as the Governor’s mansion. What if every pro-life politician and every pro-life leader in these states were to act like babies are being murdered, would reject this false notion of Judicial Supremacy, and would end abortion in their states? The Feds wouldn’t be able to do a thing in the face of 22 States defying them. This would be the end of Roe and might usher in the end of judicial supremacy altogether.

    Almost one million babies have been killed in those 22 pro-life states just during Trump’s tenure thus far, but, alas, our pro-life leaders do not think killing babies is a big enough deal to warrant standing up to the court.

    Or maybe many of them simply think it is wrong to only “save some” and would rather do nothing until they can “save them all” by overturning Roe or passing a Constitutional amendment at the national level? I think it makes more sense to try to save those we can at the state level.

    If Roe is overturned, great. The court has an obligation to right its wrongs, but we needn’t wait for the court’s permission to make murder illegal. God’s word and the Constitution command us to uphold the right to life, regardless of the opinion of any earthly judge. “I was just following orders” was no excuse for mass murder enablers of the past and it’s no excuse now.

    What Will Happen?

    A state ignoring Roe and abolishing abortion would have both legislative chambers and the governor committed to the cause, and they would be unable to pass such a bill if a large and active portion of the population weren’t on their side. With these things in place, a state could very much succeed in ending abortion.

    Almost 80% of the citizenry in Oklahoma profess to be pro-life. Even most Democrats are afraid to support abortion. Only two of 29 State House Democrats voted against Oklahoma’s dismemberment abortion ban in 2015. 15 excused themselves from the vote and 12 voted for it. The people would be behind an effort to end abortion in the state. It would be extremely difficult for the federal government to squash the will of nearly an entire state standing unified against it for a just cause.

    That doesn’t mean the feds under the leadership of a Democrat wouldn’t try. A Democrat President would likely withdraw federal funds. States like Oklahoma or Texas which pay more in than they get from the Feds should not be intimidated by such a threat.

    It’s conceivable that a Democrat President would put boots on the ground to physically keep the killing centers running, but unlikely. To defy the will of the people of Oklahoma, Indiana, or Texas in order to keep a murder legal would be a serious black eye for the federal government.

    A potentially more significant threat would come from corporate America. Many companies would threaten to boycott, music artists would cancel shows, late night comedy (the word “comedy” being used loosely) would ridicule and lampoon and foam at the mouth. This kind of pressure has caused conservative leaders in the past to fold on lesser matters.

    The ability of big business and celebrities to blackmail states is waning, however. In the face of massive Hollywood boycotts,Georgia passed a pro-life bill. Consequently, Governor Brian Kemp’s favorability ratings surged. Not only do Republicans benefit politically from standing up to the elites, Newsweek‘s Peter Roff pointed out, in a well-done piece, how much leverage states actually have against Hollywood if celebrities continues to pick fights.

    Two things would be imperative for success in defeating the feds and boycotts. First, strong, courageous leadership from people capable of articulating the moral and legal issues effectively and unflinchingly in the face of threats. Abortion is murder. In a state that’s 79% Christian, it’s not difficult to rally people behind the cause of abolishing murder. All that’s needed is someone to rally the troops. As 2016 Oklahoma abolitionist gubernatorial candidate Dan Fisher put it, “I believe that a state must stand squarely and firmly on its principles [of abolition] and let the chips fall where they may, and I would like to believe that reason and right would simply prevail.”

    Secondly, if one state were to take this bold action its success would to some degree depend on whether other states joined them. If five or six states immediately followed Oklahoma or Texas, this coalition would make targeted boycotts and financial sanctions or even physical force by the Federal government impossible to effectively execute.

    The question, then, is would other states follow? The biggest impediment to a state abolishing abortion is that the courage needed is not possessed by most politicians. But once they see someone else lead the way, many conservative politicians and states will be likely to follow. Not only that, but Christians across the country will see the action taken by the politicians of the first state to abolish abortion and demand the same from their own legislators.

    Admittedly, enforcement could be messy. The small number of radical pro-abortion folks in these states will gnash their teeth. This will be the case no matter how abortion ends, however. Their blathering shouldn’t be countenanced. Their primary accomplishment will be showcasing to the sane Americans how nasty they are. The majority of the citizenry in these states would go on with their lives unaffected.

    There might be tension between city and state officials if district attorney’s or mayors refuse to protect the right to life. A battle for authority is sure to follow. Fortunately, we have the law of the Constitution and the Supreme law of God on our side. As Fisher said, our responsibility is to do what’s right, letting the chips fall as they may.

    That implementation mightn’t be seamless in some cases is no reason not to abolish abortion. Many laws are difficult to enforce and just about all laws fail to completely eliminate the occurrence of the crime they outlaw, yet these laws remain a great deterrent to these behaviors and bring justice to many.

    The law is a also powerful teacher. Abolishing abortion would send an instructive statement to young and old that little lives matter – that killing an image-bearer of God is murder and should be treated as such. Thousands of babies would be saved. After 46 years of unmitigated bloodshed, justice will finally be established.

    Women would not be dying in the streets. They were not pre-Roe when many clinics and hospitals performed illegal abortions. The coat-hanger abortions were largely pro-abortion propaganda, lies which NARAL’s co-founder later admitted to.

    Women would not fall into a health care crisis. Just as in Ireland, where women arehealthier than in America even while abortion was illegal there for decades, women’s health care would be just fine without legalized abortion in these states.

    Clearly, there remains much educational work to be done to garner enough support and understanding of these ideas. But we will never effectively educate or mobilize people if we do not begin talking about these things and forcing the discussion. That is precisely what these bills are doing.

    As long as we are content to introduce bills instructing doctors on how to perform abortions safely or only up to a certain arbitrary point and call that winning, we will never get to where we all claim we want to be – a culture grounded in the idea that human life has inherent value and that provides equal justice for every image-bearer of God.

    Here’s the blueprint for ending abortion in a pro-life state: Draw a line in the sand. Declare abortion to be what it is – the murder of an innocent human being made in God’s image. Only support legislative efforts that will lawfully criminalize all abortion in defiance of the lawless Roe opinion. If such a bill does not exist, begin meeting with legislators and like-minded folks in your city to get one drafted and introduced. Accept nothing less from your political leaders, give them no opportunity to do less than their lawful duty. Educate pro-life people in the cause of abolition and interposition, persuade hearts and minds, and mobilize support for the total criminalization of abortion in your state. For the sake of the nearly one million preborn humans who will be murdered this year, let’s get to work.

    https://theresurgent.com/2019/04/26/what-would-happen-if-a-state-nullified-roe-and-abolished-abortion/?fbclid=IwAR1Qh79rhkTLgSebHBzi2htmArRZSZS2Zk9Ds7cO9qQ_Ggdv5kRMcQYvj-M
    Bills criminalizing abortion as murder and rejecting the authority of the courts to say otherwise have been introduced in the state legislatures of Oklahoma, Indiana, Texas, Idaho, and Washington. Due to errant Constitutional understanding, most Republican and pro-life leaders oppose such bills, calling them unconstitutional. They claim that Roe v Wade is the law of the land and, while they want to stop the killing, unconditional submission to whatever the Supreme Court says is required of them. This sentiment is terribly mistaken. We’ll address it quickly before moving on to the primary concern; namely, what would happen if a bill abolishing abortion were passed and signed into law? Would Oklahoma or Texas be able to successfully enforce it? Can We Lawfully Resist the Courts? First, let’s examine the Constitutional question. Is the Supreme Court infallible in its opinions? Must they always be obeyed? Earlier this month, Daniel Horowitz at Conservative Reviewposed the question to conservatives: “If a judge ordered Trump to resign, would that be the law?” He detailed the many ways in which the lower courts are, in effect, giving Barack Obama a third term by treating his executive actions as if they were the Constitution itself. He proceeded to ask conservatives whether there was a bridge too far that the courts could possibly cross at which point conservatives would take action. If the last half-century is an indicator, the answer is no. Conservatives have been willing to tolerate any opinion from the the courts, up to and including rulings that have directly caused more than 61 million killings. How about the Dred Scott ruling, where the Court stated that black men and women are not people but are property? How about the Buck decision in 1927 in which our (in)justices declared that the Federal government could sterilize Americans against their consent? As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes opined, “Three generations of imbeciles is enough.” Such rulings as these are wrong, and further, they are evil. Are the states and the people bound by them? Writing to early judicial supremacist Charles Jarvis, Thomas Jefferson addressed this exact question. “You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps…. Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.” The courts are often wrong. They are often absurdly wrong. Fortunately, they’ve not been given the authority of a single tribunal with ultimate power over constitutional interpretation. When they abuse their office, it is both the right and duty of the other branches of government, as well as state and local governments, to check them. This has not been happening for over 100 years, thus the secular progressives have effectively used the rogue courts as their vehicle to circumvent our democratic processes and impose their ideology upon the states. As Pastor and author Matt Trewhella has said, the courts have created “social transformation without representation.” Appointing conservative justices has done little to reign in these abuses as generations have been taught a false understanding of judicial supremacy, ingraining the idea even in most conservatives. There have been and presently are many examples of state and local governments applying proper checks and balances to the abuses of the Federal government. Many northern Statesdefied both Federal court opinion (Dred Scott) and Federal Law (the Fugitive Slave Act) 150 years ago. We celebrate them as heroes for their courage. In fact, this was the soil from which the Republican party sprung into being. Today, over 20 states are now defying Federal law over recreational marijuana usage. The Federal government under both Trump and Obama has stood down and not enforced those federal prohibitions. Other federal action on issues ranging from immigration, to health care, to environmental regulations, to gun control have already been nullified in numerous states with very little push back from D.C. Would the feds do the same if a state defied Roe and asserted their state sovereignty to protect innocent human beings in the womb? We don’t know. We do know that pro-life Republicans currently have total control of 22 States – total control meaning they have majorities in both the State House and Senate as well as the Governor’s mansion. What if every pro-life politician and every pro-life leader in these states were to act like babies are being murdered, would reject this false notion of Judicial Supremacy, and would end abortion in their states? The Feds wouldn’t be able to do a thing in the face of 22 States defying them. This would be the end of Roe and might usher in the end of judicial supremacy altogether. Almost one million babies have been killed in those 22 pro-life states just during Trump’s tenure thus far, but, alas, our pro-life leaders do not think killing babies is a big enough deal to warrant standing up to the court. Or maybe many of them simply think it is wrong to only “save some” and would rather do nothing until they can “save them all” by overturning Roe or passing a Constitutional amendment at the national level? I think it makes more sense to try to save those we can at the state level. If Roe is overturned, great. The court has an obligation to right its wrongs, but we needn’t wait for the court’s permission to make murder illegal. God’s word and the Constitution command us to uphold the right to life, regardless of the opinion of any earthly judge. “I was just following orders” was no excuse for mass murder enablers of the past and it’s no excuse now. What Will Happen? A state ignoring Roe and abolishing abortion would have both legislative chambers and the governor committed to the cause, and they would be unable to pass such a bill if a large and active portion of the population weren’t on their side. With these things in place, a state could very much succeed in ending abortion. Almost 80% of the citizenry in Oklahoma profess to be pro-life. Even most Democrats are afraid to support abortion. Only two of 29 State House Democrats voted against Oklahoma’s dismemberment abortion ban in 2015. 15 excused themselves from the vote and 12 voted for it. The people would be behind an effort to end abortion in the state. It would be extremely difficult for the federal government to squash the will of nearly an entire state standing unified against it for a just cause. That doesn’t mean the feds under the leadership of a Democrat wouldn’t try. A Democrat President would likely withdraw federal funds. States like Oklahoma or Texas which pay more in than they get from the Feds should not be intimidated by such a threat. It’s conceivable that a Democrat President would put boots on the ground to physically keep the killing centers running, but unlikely. To defy the will of the people of Oklahoma, Indiana, or Texas in order to keep a murder legal would be a serious black eye for the federal government. A potentially more significant threat would come from corporate America. Many companies would threaten to boycott, music artists would cancel shows, late night comedy (the word “comedy” being used loosely) would ridicule and lampoon and foam at the mouth. This kind of pressure has caused conservative leaders in the past to fold on lesser matters. The ability of big business and celebrities to blackmail states is waning, however. In the face of massive Hollywood boycotts,Georgia passed a pro-life bill. Consequently, Governor Brian Kemp’s favorability ratings surged. Not only do Republicans benefit politically from standing up to the elites, Newsweek‘s Peter Roff pointed out, in a well-done piece, how much leverage states actually have against Hollywood if celebrities continues to pick fights. Two things would be imperative for success in defeating the feds and boycotts. First, strong, courageous leadership from people capable of articulating the moral and legal issues effectively and unflinchingly in the face of threats. Abortion is murder. In a state that’s 79% Christian, it’s not difficult to rally people behind the cause of abolishing murder. All that’s needed is someone to rally the troops. As 2016 Oklahoma abolitionist gubernatorial candidate Dan Fisher put it, “I believe that a state must stand squarely and firmly on its principles [of abolition] and let the chips fall where they may, and I would like to believe that reason and right would simply prevail.” Secondly, if one state were to take this bold action its success would to some degree depend on whether other states joined them. If five or six states immediately followed Oklahoma or Texas, this coalition would make targeted boycotts and financial sanctions or even physical force by the Federal government impossible to effectively execute. The question, then, is would other states follow? The biggest impediment to a state abolishing abortion is that the courage needed is not possessed by most politicians. But once they see someone else lead the way, many conservative politicians and states will be likely to follow. Not only that, but Christians across the country will see the action taken by the politicians of the first state to abolish abortion and demand the same from their own legislators. Admittedly, enforcement could be messy. The small number of radical pro-abortion folks in these states will gnash their teeth. This will be the case no matter how abortion ends, however. Their blathering shouldn’t be countenanced. Their primary accomplishment will be showcasing to the sane Americans how nasty they are. The majority of the citizenry in these states would go on with their lives unaffected. There might be tension between city and state officials if district attorney’s or mayors refuse to protect the right to life. A battle for authority is sure to follow. Fortunately, we have the law of the Constitution and the Supreme law of God on our side. As Fisher said, our responsibility is to do what’s right, letting the chips fall as they may. That implementation mightn’t be seamless in some cases is no reason not to abolish abortion. Many laws are difficult to enforce and just about all laws fail to completely eliminate the occurrence of the crime they outlaw, yet these laws remain a great deterrent to these behaviors and bring justice to many. The law is a also powerful teacher. Abolishing abortion would send an instructive statement to young and old that little lives matter – that killing an image-bearer of God is murder and should be treated as such. Thousands of babies would be saved. After 46 years of unmitigated bloodshed, justice will finally be established. Women would not be dying in the streets. They were not pre-Roe when many clinics and hospitals performed illegal abortions. The coat-hanger abortions were largely pro-abortion propaganda, lies which NARAL’s co-founder later admitted to. Women would not fall into a health care crisis. Just as in Ireland, where women arehealthier than in America even while abortion was illegal there for decades, women’s health care would be just fine without legalized abortion in these states. Clearly, there remains much educational work to be done to garner enough support and understanding of these ideas. But we will never effectively educate or mobilize people if we do not begin talking about these things and forcing the discussion. That is precisely what these bills are doing. As long as we are content to introduce bills instructing doctors on how to perform abortions safely or only up to a certain arbitrary point and call that winning, we will never get to where we all claim we want to be – a culture grounded in the idea that human life has inherent value and that provides equal justice for every image-bearer of God. Here’s the blueprint for ending abortion in a pro-life state: Draw a line in the sand. Declare abortion to be what it is – the murder of an innocent human being made in God’s image. Only support legislative efforts that will lawfully criminalize all abortion in defiance of the lawless Roe opinion. If such a bill does not exist, begin meeting with legislators and like-minded folks in your city to get one drafted and introduced. Accept nothing less from your political leaders, give them no opportunity to do less than their lawful duty. Educate pro-life people in the cause of abolition and interposition, persuade hearts and minds, and mobilize support for the total criminalization of abortion in your state. For the sake of the nearly one million preborn humans who will be murdered this year, let’s get to work. https://theresurgent.com/2019/04/26/what-would-happen-if-a-state-nullified-roe-and-abolished-abortion/?fbclid=IwAR1Qh79rhkTLgSebHBzi2htmArRZSZS2Zk9Ds7cO9qQ_Ggdv5kRMcQYvj-M
    0 Comments 0 Shares

No results to show

No results to show

No results to show

Sponsored

If you like Canund Social Network then please support it by upgrading to a pro account thanks. https://canund.com/packages