• https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/10/15/part-2-cnn-leadership-and-staffers-reveal-true-sentiments-network-picks-favorites-among-democratic-candidates-on-eve-of-debate/
    https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/10/15/part-2-cnn-leadership-and-staffers-reveal-true-sentiments-network-picks-favorites-among-democratic-candidates-on-eve-of-debate/
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Better include the PPC which is the best choice!! no more globalist leadership PLEASE in Canada!!
    https://thetyee.ca/News/2019/10/14/Nanaimo-Ladysmith-Four-Way-Fight/?utm_source=weekly&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=141019
    Better include the PPC which is the best choice!! no more globalist leadership PLEASE in Canada!! https://thetyee.ca/News/2019/10/14/Nanaimo-Ladysmith-Four-Way-Fight/?utm_source=weekly&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=141019
    In Nanaimo-Ladysmith, an Election Race that’s Typical BC: A Four-Way Fight | The Tyee
    A Green now holds the seat. The NDP and Liberal are scrapping hard. The Conservative wouldn’t be interviewed.
    THETYEE.CA
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/13/exclusive-conservative-leaders-impeachment-warning-democrats-will-be-tried-at-the-ballot-box/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=todays_hottest_stories&utm_campaign=20191013
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/13/exclusive-conservative-leaders-impeachment-warning-democrats-will-be-tried-at-the-ballot-box/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=todays_hottest_stories&utm_campaign=20191013
    Exclusive: Conservative Leaders’ Impeachment Warning: Dems Will Lose
    Conservative leaders told Breitbart News the Democrats' impeachment effort against President Donald Trump will backfire in the 2020 election.
    WWW.BREITBART.COM
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://phibetaiota.net/2019/10/special-matt-taibbi-brennan-comey-clapper-and-other-secret-intelligence-leaders-indictable-for-a-permanent-coup-treason/
    https://phibetaiota.net/2019/10/special-matt-taibbi-brennan-comey-clapper-and-other-secret-intelligence-leaders-indictable-for-a-permanent-coup-treason/
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • ARE WE HAVING AN

    ELECTION?
    HELLO... HELLO ANYONE OUT THERE... OR have we all become mental zombies out of our own ignorance? This election it appears that the local candidates running have either come to the realization they don’t have a chance in hell at winning. therefore why approach the local media to release information about themselves... Or is it that these candidates by their own recognition have surrendered to the fact that voters do not vote on information but on the party hype.
    I just don’t understand if it is out of arrogance, ignorance and or not having the intellect to reach out to those they so want to represent.
    We live in a real strange Canada. A Canada slowly becoming a 3rd world nation.
    My argument is strengthened by the recent debate. What a national disgrace. Here we have what was supposed to be Canadian leaders and instead it looked like a bunch of confused minds jockeying for a big paycheque.
    I CALL FOR ALL CANADIANS TO NOT TURN OUT this election. Show them that we had enough and that to change for the sake of changing makes no logical sense. Like really!!! Andrew Scheer, is that different then Justin? One wears red the other blue. They are the ultimate ‘YING/YANG’ of political ideologies. If we swap one boy for another we will never get men to work on what matters to hard working Canadians. It was so bad that during the debate the NDP leader mocked the PPC leader over questionable racist tweets. This is the same guy that goes on Canadian National television wearing a turban. A turban in many eyes being a clear symbol of Canadian social etiquette defiance. Now tell me his actions as leader of the NDP are not prejudice and racist.
    We as Canadians are inclusive. As such we must blend in not stick out.
    It is not about having rights and exercise them without disregard for the bigger common good of the inclusive society. Is it not a slap in the face to flaunt personal preferences or believes over others? Is it not insulting noting that on someone wanting to represent you. To show open public defiance and in the same breath turn around and warn you. If you say anything about my choice to social defy you. I will become insulted and point and label you racist. Don’t get me wrong I do not have anything against turbans. I just think like silent Canadians that we have played the prejudice victim card to far. We as Canadians have standards and those standards have been compromised in the name of a false equality. As equality would consider that we must put our native land cultures/cultures/traditions aside in the name of better good for Canada.
    “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.”
    George Orwell, 1984
    ARE WE HAVING AN ELECTION? HELLO... HELLO ANYONE OUT THERE... OR have we all become mental zombies out of our own ignorance? This election it appears that the local candidates running have either come to the realization they don’t have a chance in hell at winning. therefore why approach the local media to release information about themselves... Or is it that these candidates by their own recognition have surrendered to the fact that voters do not vote on information but on the party hype. I just don’t understand if it is out of arrogance, ignorance and or not having the intellect to reach out to those they so want to represent. We live in a real strange Canada. A Canada slowly becoming a 3rd world nation. My argument is strengthened by the recent debate. What a national disgrace. Here we have what was supposed to be Canadian leaders and instead it looked like a bunch of confused minds jockeying for a big paycheque. I CALL FOR ALL CANADIANS TO NOT TURN OUT this election. Show them that we had enough and that to change for the sake of changing makes no logical sense. Like really!!! Andrew Scheer, is that different then Justin? One wears red the other blue. They are the ultimate ‘YING/YANG’ of political ideologies. If we swap one boy for another we will never get men to work on what matters to hard working Canadians. It was so bad that during the debate the NDP leader mocked the PPC leader over questionable racist tweets. This is the same guy that goes on Canadian National television wearing a turban. A turban in many eyes being a clear symbol of Canadian social etiquette defiance. Now tell me his actions as leader of the NDP are not prejudice and racist. We as Canadians are inclusive. As such we must blend in not stick out. It is not about having rights and exercise them without disregard for the bigger common good of the inclusive society. Is it not a slap in the face to flaunt personal preferences or believes over others? Is it not insulting noting that on someone wanting to represent you. To show open public defiance and in the same breath turn around and warn you. If you say anything about my choice to social defy you. I will become insulted and point and label you racist. Don’t get me wrong I do not have anything against turbans. I just think like silent Canadians that we have played the prejudice victim card to far. We as Canadians have standards and those standards have been compromised in the name of a false equality. As equality would consider that we must put our native land cultures/cultures/traditions aside in the name of better good for Canada. “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” George Orwell, 1984
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The stupidity of the Kurds to (again) allow a Turkish invasion in their areas when there is the clear alternative of submitting the rightful Syrian government is amazing. One of the YPG leaders said yesterday they were "considering" that move. Isn't it a bit late for that?
    https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/10/syria-turkey-again-invades.html#more
    The stupidity of the Kurds to (again) allow a Turkish invasion in their areas when there is the clear alternative of submitting the rightful Syrian government is amazing. One of the YPG leaders said yesterday they were "considering" that move. Isn't it a bit late for that? https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/10/syria-turkey-again-invades.html#more
    MoA - Syria - Turkey Again Invades
    WWW.MOONOFALABAMA.ORG
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://www.rt.com/news/470535-iran-leader-nuclear-weapons/
    https://www.rt.com/news/470535-iran-leader-nuclear-weapons/
    Using nuclear weapons absolutely forbidden – Iran’s supreme leader
    Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said the country is capable of developing and building nuclear weapons, but will never do so because using such a weapon is absolutely contrary to the teachings of Islam.
    WWW.RT.COM
    0 Comments 1 Shares
  • WE NEED LEADERS LIKE THIS IN CANADA.
    WE NEED LEADERS LIKE THIS IN CANADA.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/australia/item/33617-australian-leader-slams-globalism-sort-of
    https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/australia/item/33617-australian-leader-slams-globalism-sort-of
    Australian Leader Slams Globalism ... Sort Of
    In a speech last week, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison blasted “international institutions” that “demand conformity” — unaccountable internationalist bureaucracy” seeks to impose its agenda on the nations of the world — but then he defended the concept of globalism. by Alex Newman
    WWW.THENEWAMERICAN.COM
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • In European First, Proposed Constitutional Amendment in Sweden Would Enshrine Rights of Nature
    https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/10/08/european-first-proposed-constitutional-amendment-sweden-would-enshrine-rights-nature
    Jon Queally, staff writer

    Heralded as the first of its kind in Europe, a proposed constitutional amendment in Sweden seeks to enshrine the rights of Nature to ensure that the creatures, fona, and features of the natural world are protected from exploitation and abuse by endowing them with legal status previously reserved only for humans and select animals.

    "Economic growth has been the real goal, not a healthy environment. I'm tired of this era, where our arrogant worldview has driven us far beyond the planetary boundaries."

    The proposed amendment to Sweden's Instrument of Government, the nation's constitutional document, would secure the Rights of Nature to "existera, blomstra, regenerera och utvecklas"—which translates as "exist, flourish, regenerate, and evolve"—in order to provide the people and government of Sweden the ability to defend and enforce these rights on behalf of Nature.

    Introduced by Swedish MP Rebecka Le Moine with the backing of a coalition of national and international groups—including Rights of Nature Sweden, Lodyn, and the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund's International Center for the Rights of Nature—the change to Swedish law mirrors that of others in the world but, if passed, would set a new precedent in Europe.

    "For twenty years, we have been working with the national environmental goals in Sweden. After all this time, we are barely reaching two of them," Le Moine said in a statement on Tuesday.

    "The underlying value in our society is that we are the dominators of this world, and Nature is just a resource for us to use," she continued. "Economic growth has been the real goal, not a healthy environment. I'm tired of this era, where our arrogant worldview has driven us far beyond the planetary boundaries. Now, when we're in the beginning of an ecological and climate collapse, I hope we can re-think our relationship with Nature. And for me, it starts with admitting that Nature has rights."

    On its website, the group Rights of Nature Sweden explained the process for having the amendment adopted this way:

    A proposed rights of nature amendment to the Constitution could be introduced directly into the Riksdag by Members of Parliament.

    Members of Parliament may introduce private motions for consideration by the Riksdag. This occurs in the autumn, when the Riksdag opens, during which time Members may propose private motions.

    Each motion is referred to a parliamentary committee for its review and consideration (a rights of nature amendment possibly would be referred to the Committee on the Constitution, or the Committee on the Environment and Agriculture). The committee then examines the motion and presents a proposal for how the Riksdag should decide before it adopts a position in the Chamber.

    As the group also noted, this approach to defending the natural world is hardly new, with legal rights of nature having already been "recognized in laws and court decisions in the United States, Ecuador, Bolivia, Brazil, India, New Zealand, and Colombia."

    Mari Margil, associate director of CELDF's International Center for the Rights of Nature, championed the proposal and thanked Le Moine for her leadership.

    "We need to quickly make a fundamental shift in our relationship with the natural world," Margil said. "Advancing the Rights of Nature in Sweden's constitution is an important step forward. We congratulate Parliamentarian Le Moine on taking this politically brave, and necessary, step."
    In European First, Proposed Constitutional Amendment in Sweden Would Enshrine Rights of Nature https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/10/08/european-first-proposed-constitutional-amendment-sweden-would-enshrine-rights-nature Jon Queally, staff writer Heralded as the first of its kind in Europe, a proposed constitutional amendment in Sweden seeks to enshrine the rights of Nature to ensure that the creatures, fona, and features of the natural world are protected from exploitation and abuse by endowing them with legal status previously reserved only for humans and select animals. "Economic growth has been the real goal, not a healthy environment. I'm tired of this era, where our arrogant worldview has driven us far beyond the planetary boundaries." The proposed amendment to Sweden's Instrument of Government, the nation's constitutional document, would secure the Rights of Nature to "existera, blomstra, regenerera och utvecklas"—which translates as "exist, flourish, regenerate, and evolve"—in order to provide the people and government of Sweden the ability to defend and enforce these rights on behalf of Nature. Introduced by Swedish MP Rebecka Le Moine with the backing of a coalition of national and international groups—including Rights of Nature Sweden, Lodyn, and the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund's International Center for the Rights of Nature—the change to Swedish law mirrors that of others in the world but, if passed, would set a new precedent in Europe. "For twenty years, we have been working with the national environmental goals in Sweden. After all this time, we are barely reaching two of them," Le Moine said in a statement on Tuesday. "The underlying value in our society is that we are the dominators of this world, and Nature is just a resource for us to use," she continued. "Economic growth has been the real goal, not a healthy environment. I'm tired of this era, where our arrogant worldview has driven us far beyond the planetary boundaries. Now, when we're in the beginning of an ecological and climate collapse, I hope we can re-think our relationship with Nature. And for me, it starts with admitting that Nature has rights." On its website, the group Rights of Nature Sweden explained the process for having the amendment adopted this way: A proposed rights of nature amendment to the Constitution could be introduced directly into the Riksdag by Members of Parliament. Members of Parliament may introduce private motions for consideration by the Riksdag. This occurs in the autumn, when the Riksdag opens, during which time Members may propose private motions. Each motion is referred to a parliamentary committee for its review and consideration (a rights of nature amendment possibly would be referred to the Committee on the Constitution, or the Committee on the Environment and Agriculture). The committee then examines the motion and presents a proposal for how the Riksdag should decide before it adopts a position in the Chamber. As the group also noted, this approach to defending the natural world is hardly new, with legal rights of nature having already been "recognized in laws and court decisions in the United States, Ecuador, Bolivia, Brazil, India, New Zealand, and Colombia." Mari Margil, associate director of CELDF's International Center for the Rights of Nature, championed the proposal and thanked Le Moine for her leadership. "We need to quickly make a fundamental shift in our relationship with the natural world," Margil said. "Advancing the Rights of Nature in Sweden's constitution is an important step forward. We congratulate Parliamentarian Le Moine on taking this politically brave, and necessary, step."
    In European First, Proposed Constitutional Amendment in Sweden Would Enshrine Rights of Nature
    "When we're in the beginning of an ecological and climate collapse," said the lawmaker who introduced the measure, "I hope we can re-think our relationship with Nature."
    WWW.COMMONDREAMS.ORG
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares

No results to show

No results to show

No results to show

No results to show