• "How does Canada's FPTP voting system work?
    In every riding, the candidate that wins the highest number of votes wins the right to represent that particular seat in the House of Commons.
    The winner does not need an absolute majority — i.e., more than 50 per cent of the votes cast in the riding."
    -this makes sense to me because each riding should have multiple candidates to choose from and the more candidates there are the less likely it will be that one gets 50% of the votes.
    "The first-past-the-post system can also encourage what some call tactical voting — casting a ballot not for the person you want to vote for, but for the candidate best positioned to defeat the candidate you most dislike."
    -this is a HORRIBLE way to vote and has plagued our system for years but will not disappear with the suggested other ways of counting votes.
    "There are a variety of PR models but the objective is to make a party's share of seats in the Commons equal to their slice of the popular vote."
    -this is not true because some ridings don't have a candidate from EACH party that people are allowed to vote for.
    "Elections Canada says there were 18 political parties registered in 2011, down from the all-time high of 19 in 2008."
    -this means there should be 18 people to choose from to vote for in EACH riding but usually there is not!!!
    "338 (170 required for majority)"
    -with 338 seats and 18 parties there should be at least 10 seats for each party.
    "Vacant (5)"
    -with 18 parties there should not be any "vacant" seats
    "Ontario 95
    Quebec 75
    British Columbia 28
    Alberta 21
    Manitoba 14
    Saskatchewan 14
    Nova Scotia 11
    New Brunswick 10
    Newfoundland and Lab 7
    Prince Edward Island 4
    Northwest Territories 1
    Yukon 1
    Nunavut 1"
    -this worries me as well, Ontario Quebec should be closer to BC's number and the ones at the bottom of the list should all be at least 10
    "How does Canada's FPTP voting system work? In every riding, the candidate that wins the highest number of votes wins the right to represent that particular seat in the House of Commons. The winner does not need an absolute majority — i.e., more than 50 per cent of the votes cast in the riding." -this makes sense to me because each riding should have multiple candidates to choose from and the more candidates there are the less likely it will be that one gets 50% of the votes. "The first-past-the-post system can also encourage what some call tactical voting — casting a ballot not for the person you want to vote for, but for the candidate best positioned to defeat the candidate you most dislike." -this is a HORRIBLE way to vote and has plagued our system for years but will not disappear with the suggested other ways of counting votes. "There are a variety of PR models but the objective is to make a party's share of seats in the Commons equal to their slice of the popular vote." -this is not true because some ridings don't have a candidate from EACH party that people are allowed to vote for. "Elections Canada says there were 18 political parties registered in 2011, down from the all-time high of 19 in 2008." -this means there should be 18 people to choose from to vote for in EACH riding but usually there is not!!! "338 (170 required for majority)" -with 338 seats and 18 parties there should be at least 10 seats for each party. "Vacant (5)" -with 18 parties there should not be any "vacant" seats "Ontario 95 Quebec 75 British Columbia 28 Alberta 21 Manitoba 14 Saskatchewan 14 Nova Scotia 11 New Brunswick 10 Newfoundland and Lab 7 Prince Edward Island 4 Northwest Territories 1 Yukon 1 Nunavut 1" -this worries me as well, Ontario Quebec should be closer to BC's number and the ones at the bottom of the list should all be at least 10
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Hello,

    Please join hands with me in a “A NOBLE CAUSE - MAKE OUR PLAENET EARTH MORE SUSTAINABLE”

    All positive efforts towards this objective will be recognized and paid off in due course:

    Please check and sign up: https://bUnited.com/invite/BBRQ-1675/05/

    Also, you are requested to invite your friends and dear ones to join this campaign.

    Let us be united!!! Let us help the world!!!

    Thanks and regards

    Hello, Please join hands with me in a “A NOBLE CAUSE - MAKE OUR PLAENET EARTH MORE SUSTAINABLE” All positive efforts towards this objective will be recognized and paid off in due course: Please check and sign up: https://bUnited.com/invite/BBRQ-1675/05/ Also, you are requested to invite your friends and dear ones to join this campaign. Let us be united!!! Let us help the world!!! Thanks and regards
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The Dutch government, which is allegedly a neutral side in the MH17 case, is de-facto impeding the objective investigation of the tragedy.
    The Dutch government, which is allegedly a neutral side in the MH17 case, is de-facto impeding the objective investigation of the tragedy.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The Trump Administration’s Assault on Fair Housing
    https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/08/24/trump-administrations-assault-fair-housing
    Olatunde Johnson, Michelle Aronowitz

    This week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a proposed rule that would substantially limit enforcement of the 1968 Fair Housing Act, whose purpose is to provide for fair housing throughout the United States.

    The re-reading of the Fair Housing Act urged by the President and his Cabinet Secretary Ben Carson appears to eliminate the possibility of challenging systemic discrimination—which is often subtle and embedded in government and industry practices—and risks deepening patterns of segregation and racial wealth disparities.

    The proposal would gut the core of the Act’s disparate impact method of proof. This is despite the Supreme Court’s affirmance of this approach in a 2015 decision authored by Justice Kennedy in Texas Dep’t of Housing & Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project (ICP).

    The disparate impact method of proof has been used to challenge loan practices that exclude or charge higher prices to minorities or target them for subprime loans; it has also been used to address practices that displace minority communities to further gentrification and to combat discriminatory zoning practices that exclude minorities from majority-white communities.

    The proposal "risks deepening patterns of segregation and racial wealth disparities." An example of disparate impact involves a challenge to actions taken by St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, a majority-white community outside of New Orleans, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The parish had adopted a number of measures to prevent blacks displaced by the Hurricane from relocating to the Parish. One such measure was a “blood relative ordinance,” which prohibited rentals to those without blood ties to existing St. Bernard Parish residents. A court ruled that the Parish’s actions violated the Fair Housing Act under intent and impact theories, and Justice Kennedy in ICP cited this case in making clear that the Act reached disparate impact claims.

    The single question presented in ICP was whether the statute permits disparate impact claims. The Court therefore did not decide what standard should be used to analyze those claims.

    HUD’s current disparate impact rule, adopted in 2013 by the Obama administration after an extensive regulatory process, formalizes the longstanding understanding that the Act prohibits policies and practices by the housing industry that cause segregation or adverse disparate effects on protected groups, and that lack sufficient justification.

    The 2013 rule applies the traditional three-step burden shifting approach for proving disparate impact claims, embodied in other civil rights statutes such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (employment discrimination). The Title VII disparate impact standard was codified by statute in 1991, and the current HUD standard aligns closely with that. As in employment, HUD’s 2013 rule made clear that a statistical disparity alone is not enough to prove disparate impact discrimination under the Fair Housing Act.

    The Trump Administration’s proposed rule would tear through that careful structure by piling on new requirements for plaintiffs and creating broad defenses for the housing industry.

    First, HUD’s proposal perverts the concept of a prima facie case by incorporating the defendant’s rebuttal into the plaintiff’s prima facie case. Traditionally, if the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case and the defendant fails to rebut, the plaintiff prevails.

    Under the new rule, in order to prevail, the plaintiff is expected to establish its affirmative case as well as prove the negative – that no rebuttal is possible. In other words, as part of the prima facie case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant has no “valid interest or legitimate objective” in the challenged practice.

    These unusual standards are incorporated into the proposed rule’s novel five-factor test for establishing a prima facie case. Not only does the defendant have no burden to prove a valid interest to rebut the prima facie case (although it can elect to submit evidence if it would like), it is afforded two entirely new, extremely broad defenses that shield it from liability.

    The first of the two defenses operates almost like a preemption doctrine rather than how it is described in the preamble – as a rebuttal of plaintiff’s causation requirement. The proposed rule gives the defendant a complete defense to a disparate impact claim if it can show its discretion is “materially limited” by federal, state or local law, or by a “binding or controlling court, arbitral, regulatory, administrative order, or administrative requirement.”

    The Trump administration’s “following orders” defense flies in the face of the core purpose of the Fair Housing Act – which is to dismantle segregation and eradicate barriers to equal housing opportunity – be they intentionally imposed or inadvertent yet unnecessary, and whether established at the local, state or federal level, or by private corporate interests.

    The second defense to a prima facie case is available to defendants who use algorithms or other models in making their housing decisions; but it operates more like an exemption for most if not all of the financial services industry – namely mortgage banking and homeowners insurance.

    For instance, it makes disparate impact challenges to underwriting decisions unenforceable if the model is the industry standard, or if the model predicts for risk or some other valid objective and none of the factors in the model are intentionally discriminatory (i.e., are “substitutes or close proxies for” a protected group).

    The effect of this defense is to exempt from the Act those industries that denied or limited black access to the wealth generating capital available to many Americans, regardless of class. More recently in cities like Baltimore, banks sought out black and brown communities to provide them inferior loans. Nationally, black communities still have not recovered the wealth lost during the financial crises.

    Between the unusually stringent and likely never to be satisfied prima facie case, and the two all-encompassing and easy to satisfy defenses, the proposed rule appears to use a belt and suspenders approach geared to ensure no effects case slips through. If the rule is finalized, it is likely to be challenged in court. It will then be to challengers to show a court that the Trump administration’s interpretation distorts the meaning of the 1968 Fair Housing Act and undermines both congressional and judicial authority.
    The Trump Administration’s Assault on Fair Housing https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/08/24/trump-administrations-assault-fair-housing Olatunde Johnson, Michelle Aronowitz This week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a proposed rule that would substantially limit enforcement of the 1968 Fair Housing Act, whose purpose is to provide for fair housing throughout the United States. The re-reading of the Fair Housing Act urged by the President and his Cabinet Secretary Ben Carson appears to eliminate the possibility of challenging systemic discrimination—which is often subtle and embedded in government and industry practices—and risks deepening patterns of segregation and racial wealth disparities. The proposal would gut the core of the Act’s disparate impact method of proof. This is despite the Supreme Court’s affirmance of this approach in a 2015 decision authored by Justice Kennedy in Texas Dep’t of Housing & Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project (ICP). The disparate impact method of proof has been used to challenge loan practices that exclude or charge higher prices to minorities or target them for subprime loans; it has also been used to address practices that displace minority communities to further gentrification and to combat discriminatory zoning practices that exclude minorities from majority-white communities. The proposal "risks deepening patterns of segregation and racial wealth disparities." An example of disparate impact involves a challenge to actions taken by St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, a majority-white community outside of New Orleans, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The parish had adopted a number of measures to prevent blacks displaced by the Hurricane from relocating to the Parish. One such measure was a “blood relative ordinance,” which prohibited rentals to those without blood ties to existing St. Bernard Parish residents. A court ruled that the Parish’s actions violated the Fair Housing Act under intent and impact theories, and Justice Kennedy in ICP cited this case in making clear that the Act reached disparate impact claims. The single question presented in ICP was whether the statute permits disparate impact claims. The Court therefore did not decide what standard should be used to analyze those claims. HUD’s current disparate impact rule, adopted in 2013 by the Obama administration after an extensive regulatory process, formalizes the longstanding understanding that the Act prohibits policies and practices by the housing industry that cause segregation or adverse disparate effects on protected groups, and that lack sufficient justification. The 2013 rule applies the traditional three-step burden shifting approach for proving disparate impact claims, embodied in other civil rights statutes such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (employment discrimination). The Title VII disparate impact standard was codified by statute in 1991, and the current HUD standard aligns closely with that. As in employment, HUD’s 2013 rule made clear that a statistical disparity alone is not enough to prove disparate impact discrimination under the Fair Housing Act. The Trump Administration’s proposed rule would tear through that careful structure by piling on new requirements for plaintiffs and creating broad defenses for the housing industry. First, HUD’s proposal perverts the concept of a prima facie case by incorporating the defendant’s rebuttal into the plaintiff’s prima facie case. Traditionally, if the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case and the defendant fails to rebut, the plaintiff prevails. Under the new rule, in order to prevail, the plaintiff is expected to establish its affirmative case as well as prove the negative – that no rebuttal is possible. In other words, as part of the prima facie case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant has no “valid interest or legitimate objective” in the challenged practice. These unusual standards are incorporated into the proposed rule’s novel five-factor test for establishing a prima facie case. Not only does the defendant have no burden to prove a valid interest to rebut the prima facie case (although it can elect to submit evidence if it would like), it is afforded two entirely new, extremely broad defenses that shield it from liability. The first of the two defenses operates almost like a preemption doctrine rather than how it is described in the preamble – as a rebuttal of plaintiff’s causation requirement. The proposed rule gives the defendant a complete defense to a disparate impact claim if it can show its discretion is “materially limited” by federal, state or local law, or by a “binding or controlling court, arbitral, regulatory, administrative order, or administrative requirement.” The Trump administration’s “following orders” defense flies in the face of the core purpose of the Fair Housing Act – which is to dismantle segregation and eradicate barriers to equal housing opportunity – be they intentionally imposed or inadvertent yet unnecessary, and whether established at the local, state or federal level, or by private corporate interests. The second defense to a prima facie case is available to defendants who use algorithms or other models in making their housing decisions; but it operates more like an exemption for most if not all of the financial services industry – namely mortgage banking and homeowners insurance. For instance, it makes disparate impact challenges to underwriting decisions unenforceable if the model is the industry standard, or if the model predicts for risk or some other valid objective and none of the factors in the model are intentionally discriminatory (i.e., are “substitutes or close proxies for” a protected group). The effect of this defense is to exempt from the Act those industries that denied or limited black access to the wealth generating capital available to many Americans, regardless of class. More recently in cities like Baltimore, banks sought out black and brown communities to provide them inferior loans. Nationally, black communities still have not recovered the wealth lost during the financial crises. Between the unusually stringent and likely never to be satisfied prima facie case, and the two all-encompassing and easy to satisfy defenses, the proposed rule appears to use a belt and suspenders approach geared to ensure no effects case slips through. If the rule is finalized, it is likely to be challenged in court. It will then be to challengers to show a court that the Trump administration’s interpretation distorts the meaning of the 1968 Fair Housing Act and undermines both congressional and judicial authority.
    The Trump Administration’s Assault on Fair Housing
    The proposal would gut the core of the Fair Housing Act’s disparate impact method of proof... This week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a proposed rule that would substantially limit enforcement of the 1968 Fair Housing Act, whose purpose is to provide for fair housing throughout the United States.
    WWW.COMMONDREAMS.ORG
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Defending Tulsi From the Programmed War Propagandists
    Russiagate: The Miserable Truth
    https://desultoryheroics.com/2019/08/22/russiagate-the-miserable-truth/
    Posted By Luther Blissett By Barry Kissin: OpEdNews 8/22/19

    Introductory Disclaimer: I have never voted Republican for Federal office and I deplore most of what Fox News has to offer. I am currently registered Democrat in order to vote in the Presidential primary for either Bernie Sanders or Tulsi Gabbard.

    Going on three years ago, on Nov. 12, 2016, my local newspaper, the Frederick News-Post, published my letter that stated: “Hillary Clinton was a terrible candidate. In an effort to deflect attention from the DNC rigging of her primary contest with Bernie Sanders, she resorted to somehow blaming the Russians. This was part of a pathological pattern, whose ultimate purpose was and is to remove the main obstacle (Russia under Putin) to neo-con schemes for global domination.”

    We do not want to further demonize Russia (or Iran). This is unwarranted and dangerous to human survival. Its purpose is to aggressively assert American Empire against all limitations and to justify the astronomical sums we spend on war and weapons.

    Hillary touted that all of our 17 intelligence agencies concluded with “high confidence” that the Russians meddled in our election for Trump’s benefit.

    False.

    The assessor was John Brennan, then spy-in-chief, who put together a secret panel of his choices from FBI, CIA and NSA in order to produce his miserable invention of the who, how and why the Russians did their dastardly meddling.

    See Washington Post, June 23, 2017: “CIA Director John Brennan first alerts the White House in early August [2016] that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an operation to defeat or at least damage Hillary Clinton and help elect her opponent, Donald Trump” based on what Brennan claimed was some source “deep inside the Russian government that detailed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s direct involvement in a cyber campaign”.

    Which source had supplied “Putin’s specific instructions on the operation’s audacious objectives”?

    No evidence has ever been produced backing up any of this.

    Enter Mueller, a “deep state” hack if there ever was one. It bears mentioning that Mueller is the grandnephew of Richard Bissel, second in command at the CIA when JFK fired him after the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Mueller is married to the granddaughter of General Charles Cabell, third in command at the CIA, also fired by JFK; Mueller’s wife is also a grandniece of Earl Cabell, Mayor of Dallas when JFK was assassinated there, who was recently uncovered to have been a CIA asset. Small world.

    Mueller’s career is replete with the production of disinformation and cover-ups. My community, home of Fort Detrick, got a dose of Mueller at work in the Amerithrax investigation.

    That investigation is the one in which Mueller framed Detrick scientist Bruce Ivins for sending the anthrax letters in order to cover up that the weaponization of the anthrax attack was a unique CIA technology.

    On behalf of his current handlers, Mueller sang and danced his way into various indictments, most of which truly had nothing to do with Russiagate, but he couldn’t pull off even trying to nail Trump for collusion.

    Of course, this isn’t the end of it. Pathetically, Democrats are pretending that Russiagate was nevertheless worthwhile (thus compounding the stupidity) on the basis that Trump obstructed justice, and also that we now know we have to protect our precious Presidential election from the Russians.

    Obstructed what? Obstructed an investigation into the fabricated charge of collusion? Mueller just testified (on July 24) that whatever Trump did, it neither curtailed nor hindered his investigation, which after more than two years could neither find nor manufacture any evidence of collusion.

    But now let’s drill down into this mantra of Russian meddling. According to the Mueller report, there were two facets:

    1.) hacking of the DNC emails then sourcing to Wikileaks; and

    2.) social media campaign.

    The social media campaign is a joke.

    The hacking story is more serious.

    According to Mueller, it was the Russian company Internet Research Agency (IRA) that on behalf of the Russian government conducted the Facebook campaign.

    At page 25 of Vol. 1, Mueller informs us that this Russian company purchased 3,500 ads for a total expenditure of $100,000, which I ask you to compare to the $81 million spent on Facebook ads by the Trump and Clinton campaigns.

    It’s sillier than that. According to Facebook’s testimony before Congress, most of the ads the IRA purchased were after the election and most said nothing about either Hillary or Trump. But they tended to promote “divisiveness” according to Mueller. Absurd!

    We also now have a recently unsealed ruling by the U.S. District Court for D.C. that ordered Mueller to cease and desist from claiming that IRA was acting on behalf of the Kremlin – his linchpin claim — supported by no substantive evidence.

    The most credible analyst of the hacking story has been completely (and deliberately) ignored by mainstream media. The implications of his analysis are so unsettling (dangerous) that even most alternative media avoid acknowledging him.

    But I believe “unsettling” is necessary to the process of waking up from the fairy tales Americans rely on, so I will lay out the truth about the stolen emails. This truth is simple and clear and unsettling.

    The “most credible analyst” is named William Binney. He is a 32-year veteran of the NSA who, when he left the NSA in 2001, was the “Technical Leader” for intelligence, the senior technical analyst at the NSA.

    Binney resigned and blew the whistle when he discovered that his surveillance program was being used to spy on Americans without probable cause.

    Binney went on to co-found Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) comprised of our smartest and bravest intelligence veterans whose very first effort in Feb., 2003 was to debunk Colin Powell’s UN presentation and to warn against “a war [upon Iraq] for which we see no compelling reason and from which we believe the unintended consequences are likely to be catastrophic.”

    The VIPS forensic analysis of the hacking story in all of its painstaking detail can be accessed at ConsortiumNews.com.

    Here is a takeaway: On July 5, 2016, the intrusion into the DNC emails transferred data at an average speed of 22.7 megabytes per second, a speed that far exceeded the capability of the Internet as of July 2016. The speed of that data transfer corresponds with the speed of copying to a thumb drive (memory stick).

    Thus, there was no hack via the internet; it was a leak by someone with physical access to a DNC computer or server, most probably an insider.

    We know who that insider was.

    His name, Seth Rich; a 27-year old DNC staffer who supported Bernie Sanders, and who was murdered in Washington, D.C on July 10, 2016.

    Two gun shots in the back. D.C. police said Rich was the victim of a “random burglary,” but nothing was taken, not his expensive watch, nor his money, nor his credit cards, nor his cell phone.

    On August 9, 2016, Julian Assange was interviewed on Dutch TV in a segment available on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg

    Without violating the Wikileaks cardinal rule of never revealing sources, Assange came as close as he could to identifying Seth Rich as the source of the DNC emails.

    On that same date, Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of Rich’s killer or killers.

    William Binney informs us that in response to a FOIA request seeking records of communications between Seth Rich and others including Julian Assange, the NSA revealed that it has 15 documents, 32 pages of relevant records, but that it is all classified.

    Next witness, Seymour Hersh. Wikipedia: “Hersh first gained recognition in 1969 for exposing the My Lai Massacre and its cover-up during the Vietnam War, for which he received the 1970 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting.

    During the 1970s, Hersh covered Watergate for The New York Times and revealed the clandestine bombing of Cambodia.

    In 2004, he reported on the US military’s mistreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison.

    He has won two National Magazine Awards and five George Polk Awards. In 2004, he received the George Orwell Award. More recently, Hersh uncovered that Obama, and Trump in 2017, blamed chemical attacks in Syria on Assad as a pretext for bombing Syria when in fact the chemical attacks were staged by the “rebels” we support.

    In Nov. 2016, when Hersh did not realize he was being recorded, the recording became available months later on youtube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwMKFnzLoxQ , here’s what Hersh said:

    “All I know comes off an FBI report”.

    Paraphrasing : The D.C. police got a warrant to search Rich’s apartment. They seized his computer and turned it over to the FBI’s cyber unit. What the [FBI] report says is that sometime in late spring/early summer, [Seth Rich] makes contact with Wikileaks. That’s in his computer; [Rich]; had submitted some juicy emails from the DNC. He offered an extensive sample”, and said, “I want money; anyway Wikileaks got access.

    Hersh goes on to say: “Brennan’s an a**hole. I’ve known all these people for years. I have somebody on the inside who will go and read a file for me. This person is unbelievably accurate and careful. He’s a very high level guy. It’s a Brennan operation. [Russiagate] was an American disinformation operation.”

    Seth Rich had to be eliminated before Russiagate could be perpetrated.
    Defending Tulsi From the Programmed War Propagandists Russiagate: The Miserable Truth https://desultoryheroics.com/2019/08/22/russiagate-the-miserable-truth/ Posted By Luther Blissett By Barry Kissin: OpEdNews 8/22/19 Introductory Disclaimer: I have never voted Republican for Federal office and I deplore most of what Fox News has to offer. I am currently registered Democrat in order to vote in the Presidential primary for either Bernie Sanders or Tulsi Gabbard. Going on three years ago, on Nov. 12, 2016, my local newspaper, the Frederick News-Post, published my letter that stated: “Hillary Clinton was a terrible candidate. In an effort to deflect attention from the DNC rigging of her primary contest with Bernie Sanders, she resorted to somehow blaming the Russians. This was part of a pathological pattern, whose ultimate purpose was and is to remove the main obstacle (Russia under Putin) to neo-con schemes for global domination.” We do not want to further demonize Russia (or Iran). This is unwarranted and dangerous to human survival. Its purpose is to aggressively assert American Empire against all limitations and to justify the astronomical sums we spend on war and weapons. Hillary touted that all of our 17 intelligence agencies concluded with “high confidence” that the Russians meddled in our election for Trump’s benefit. False. The assessor was John Brennan, then spy-in-chief, who put together a secret panel of his choices from FBI, CIA and NSA in order to produce his miserable invention of the who, how and why the Russians did their dastardly meddling. See Washington Post, June 23, 2017: “CIA Director John Brennan first alerts the White House in early August [2016] that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an operation to defeat or at least damage Hillary Clinton and help elect her opponent, Donald Trump” based on what Brennan claimed was some source “deep inside the Russian government that detailed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s direct involvement in a cyber campaign”. Which source had supplied “Putin’s specific instructions on the operation’s audacious objectives”? No evidence has ever been produced backing up any of this. Enter Mueller, a “deep state” hack if there ever was one. It bears mentioning that Mueller is the grandnephew of Richard Bissel, second in command at the CIA when JFK fired him after the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Mueller is married to the granddaughter of General Charles Cabell, third in command at the CIA, also fired by JFK; Mueller’s wife is also a grandniece of Earl Cabell, Mayor of Dallas when JFK was assassinated there, who was recently uncovered to have been a CIA asset. Small world. Mueller’s career is replete with the production of disinformation and cover-ups. My community, home of Fort Detrick, got a dose of Mueller at work in the Amerithrax investigation. That investigation is the one in which Mueller framed Detrick scientist Bruce Ivins for sending the anthrax letters in order to cover up that the weaponization of the anthrax attack was a unique CIA technology. On behalf of his current handlers, Mueller sang and danced his way into various indictments, most of which truly had nothing to do with Russiagate, but he couldn’t pull off even trying to nail Trump for collusion. Of course, this isn’t the end of it. Pathetically, Democrats are pretending that Russiagate was nevertheless worthwhile (thus compounding the stupidity) on the basis that Trump obstructed justice, and also that we now know we have to protect our precious Presidential election from the Russians. Obstructed what? Obstructed an investigation into the fabricated charge of collusion? Mueller just testified (on July 24) that whatever Trump did, it neither curtailed nor hindered his investigation, which after more than two years could neither find nor manufacture any evidence of collusion. But now let’s drill down into this mantra of Russian meddling. According to the Mueller report, there were two facets: 1.) hacking of the DNC emails then sourcing to Wikileaks; and 2.) social media campaign. The social media campaign is a joke. The hacking story is more serious. According to Mueller, it was the Russian company Internet Research Agency (IRA) that on behalf of the Russian government conducted the Facebook campaign. At page 25 of Vol. 1, Mueller informs us that this Russian company purchased 3,500 ads for a total expenditure of $100,000, which I ask you to compare to the $81 million spent on Facebook ads by the Trump and Clinton campaigns. It’s sillier than that. According to Facebook’s testimony before Congress, most of the ads the IRA purchased were after the election and most said nothing about either Hillary or Trump. But they tended to promote “divisiveness” according to Mueller. Absurd! We also now have a recently unsealed ruling by the U.S. District Court for D.C. that ordered Mueller to cease and desist from claiming that IRA was acting on behalf of the Kremlin – his linchpin claim — supported by no substantive evidence. The most credible analyst of the hacking story has been completely (and deliberately) ignored by mainstream media. The implications of his analysis are so unsettling (dangerous) that even most alternative media avoid acknowledging him. But I believe “unsettling” is necessary to the process of waking up from the fairy tales Americans rely on, so I will lay out the truth about the stolen emails. This truth is simple and clear and unsettling. The “most credible analyst” is named William Binney. He is a 32-year veteran of the NSA who, when he left the NSA in 2001, was the “Technical Leader” for intelligence, the senior technical analyst at the NSA. Binney resigned and blew the whistle when he discovered that his surveillance program was being used to spy on Americans without probable cause. Binney went on to co-found Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) comprised of our smartest and bravest intelligence veterans whose very first effort in Feb., 2003 was to debunk Colin Powell’s UN presentation and to warn against “a war [upon Iraq] for which we see no compelling reason and from which we believe the unintended consequences are likely to be catastrophic.” The VIPS forensic analysis of the hacking story in all of its painstaking detail can be accessed at ConsortiumNews.com. Here is a takeaway: On July 5, 2016, the intrusion into the DNC emails transferred data at an average speed of 22.7 megabytes per second, a speed that far exceeded the capability of the Internet as of July 2016. The speed of that data transfer corresponds with the speed of copying to a thumb drive (memory stick). Thus, there was no hack via the internet; it was a leak by someone with physical access to a DNC computer or server, most probably an insider. We know who that insider was. His name, Seth Rich; a 27-year old DNC staffer who supported Bernie Sanders, and who was murdered in Washington, D.C on July 10, 2016. Two gun shots in the back. D.C. police said Rich was the victim of a “random burglary,” but nothing was taken, not his expensive watch, nor his money, nor his credit cards, nor his cell phone. On August 9, 2016, Julian Assange was interviewed on Dutch TV in a segment available on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg Without violating the Wikileaks cardinal rule of never revealing sources, Assange came as close as he could to identifying Seth Rich as the source of the DNC emails. On that same date, Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of Rich’s killer or killers. William Binney informs us that in response to a FOIA request seeking records of communications between Seth Rich and others including Julian Assange, the NSA revealed that it has 15 documents, 32 pages of relevant records, but that it is all classified. Next witness, Seymour Hersh. Wikipedia: “Hersh first gained recognition in 1969 for exposing the My Lai Massacre and its cover-up during the Vietnam War, for which he received the 1970 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting. During the 1970s, Hersh covered Watergate for The New York Times and revealed the clandestine bombing of Cambodia. In 2004, he reported on the US military’s mistreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison. He has won two National Magazine Awards and five George Polk Awards. In 2004, he received the George Orwell Award. More recently, Hersh uncovered that Obama, and Trump in 2017, blamed chemical attacks in Syria on Assad as a pretext for bombing Syria when in fact the chemical attacks were staged by the “rebels” we support. In Nov. 2016, when Hersh did not realize he was being recorded, the recording became available months later on youtube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwMKFnzLoxQ , here’s what Hersh said: “All I know comes off an FBI report”. Paraphrasing : The D.C. police got a warrant to search Rich’s apartment. They seized his computer and turned it over to the FBI’s cyber unit. What the [FBI] report says is that sometime in late spring/early summer, [Seth Rich] makes contact with Wikileaks. That’s in his computer; [Rich]; had submitted some juicy emails from the DNC. He offered an extensive sample”, and said, “I want money; anyway Wikileaks got access. Hersh goes on to say: “Brennan’s an a**hole. I’ve known all these people for years. I have somebody on the inside who will go and read a file for me. This person is unbelievably accurate and careful. He’s a very high level guy. It’s a Brennan operation. [Russiagate] was an American disinformation operation.” Seth Rich had to be eliminated before Russiagate could be perpetrated.
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Actions
    GERMANY REPORT

    EATING NRW DEN
    21..08. 2019

    TIME 7 PM 12 MIN

    GERMANY
    EATING NRW STEEL
    BERGMANN field "SMALL ISTANBUL"
    START OF NO GO ZONE
    REPORT 2019.08.21
    LIVING AFTER FUSE! OK!
    to 1) (TRUTH OR NOT TRUTH CONDITION BY TRANCE OF THE ILLUMINATI THE FREEMASON SATANIST SECRET ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY

    CHAOS IN THE NIGHT ON THE BASIS OF MY POSTAL YESTERDAY OWNER ADMINISTRATION CHEFS USW WITH DECLARATION IN THE GOAL OF THE BOSS OF EUROPE FROM THE MOSSAD AND THE DOGGY MERKEL TERMINATED THAT HE LETS ME NOW TO REVEAL HIS FACE THE LIBANESE MAFIA OF ISLAM HIGHLIGHTS THIS TOO THEN ALL THINGS WERE CALLED AGAIN, CONFIRMED, ETC. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT EVERYTHING EXACTLY EXECUTES AS I DESCRIBED HAVE THE MOST POPULAR CHAOS I NEED TO FEED IT FULL AND REPORTS I WAS NOT OUTSTANDING HOME BECAUSE OF CHEMTRAILS BY A RANDOM I COULD TAKE A CONTACT WITH US AND NATO MILITARY THEREFORE MORE DEMANDS CHEMTRAIL INQUIRY AND ANSWERS REQUESTED A POSSIBILITY TO SEE AND FOUND CHEMTRAILS TO FLY WITHOUT LEAVING THE STRIKING STRIPES IN HEAVEN DECIDED TO FLY HIGHER THAN THE CLOUDS AND INTO PUNCHES WITH ADDITIONS TO MAKE OWN CLOUDS SO THE HEAVEN NORMAL APPEAR BUT EVERY CLOUD IS ARTIFICIAL OR VACCINATED THEN THE POISONING GOES ONLY ONLY FIRED A LOOK AT THE WEATHER DATA SHOWS THAT IT WILL NOT GIVE A CLEAR HEAVY BUT IT'S CLOUDY THE NEXT MONTHS I TAKE AT CLOUDING THAT DOES NOT FALL ON A BEAMING BLUE HEAVEN WITHOUT CLOUDS WE WILL BE WELL DRAINING CAN FALL FOR THE AUTUMN AND WINTER IF WE THIS EN WITHOUT WAR, I AM FEARING THEMSELVES THAT THE COMPOSITIONS WILL BE HARDENERS THROUGH THE TAKEOVER OF ISLAM IN EUROPE. THE OBJECTIVE IS TO MAKE A UNLAWFULNESS IN THE CONNECTION OF MOBILE MASTERS CHEMTRAIL AND PROPAGANDA THROUGH MEDIA THE PLANNING IS TWICE, THE NANO ROBOTICS SHOULD NOT WORK THIS way UNLAWFUL IS SUITABLE FOR THE ABOLITION OF A-WEAPONS
    SO NOW TO ME BY THE INFLAMMENTS IN THE EAR I HEAR RIGHT GARNICHTS MORE OF THE TORCH THROWNED BY A BANG PRESSURE HAVE ALSO SEE WHETHER THE AGAIN IS COMING OK THOMAS WITH AN EAR TO THE ASS OF THE ELITES
    UNTIL TOMORROW SO GOD WANTS AND GRACE HAS
    PS: IN MY MIDDLE CALM, THERE WERE OTHER INCIDENTS THAT I AM TELLING MORNING WILL STAND UPON MY BATTERY

    Aktionen
    DEUTSCHLAND BERICHT

    ESSEN NRW DEN
    21..08. 2019

    ZEIT 19 UHR 12 MIN

    DEUTSCHLAND
    ESSEN NRW STAHL
    BERGMANN Feld "SMALL ISTANBUL"
    ANFANG EINER NO GO ZONE
    BERICHT 2019.08.21
    lebendige NACH SICHERUNG! OK!
    zu 1) (WAHRHEIT ODER NICHT WAHRHEITSBEDINGUNG DURCH TRANCE DER ILLUMINATI DER FREIMAURER-SATANISTEN-SECRET-ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY

    CHAOS IN DER NACHT AUF GRUND MEINER POSTES GESTERN VERMIETER VERWALTUNG CHEFS USW MIT AUFKLÄRUNG IM GANGE DER CHEF EUROPA VOM MOSSAD UND DAS HÜNDCHEN MERKEL KÜNDIGTEN AN DAS ER MICH JETZT TÖTEN LÄSST UM SEIN GESICHT ZU WAHREN DIE LIBANESEN MAFIA DER ISLAM HOCH AUF BEGEISTERT DAS AUS ZU FÜHREN DANN WURDE ALLES WIEDER RUFEN WIEDER BESTÄTIGT USW. ES WURDE BESTÄTIGT DAS ALLES GENAU SO ABLÄUFT WIE ICH BESCHRIEBEN HABE DAS REINSTE CHAOS ICH MUSS DAS NOCHMAL NACH VOLL ZIEHEN UND BERICHTEN ICH BIN NICHT AUẞER HAUS GEWESEN WEGEN CHEMTRAILS DURCH EINEN ZUFALL KONNTE ICH EIN GESPRÄCH MIT HÖREN US UND NATO MILITÄR DA IMMER MEHR ANFRAGEN WEGEN CHEMTRAIL EINGEHEN UND ANTWORTEN FORDERN WURDE EINE MÖGLICHKEIT GESUCHT UND GEFUNDEN WEITER CHEMTRAILS ZU FLIEGEN OHNE DIE AUFFÄLLIGEN STREIFEN AM HIMMEL ZU HINTERLASSEN BESCHLOSSEN WURDE HÖHER ALS DIE WOLKEN ZU FLIEGEN UND IN STÖẞEN MIT ZUSÄTZEN EIGENE WOLKEN ZU BILDEN SO DAS DER HIMMEL NORMAL ERSCHEINEN ABER JEDE WOLKE IST KÜNSTLICH ODER GEIMPFT ALSO DIE VERGIFTUNG GEHT WEITER NUR GETARNT EIN BLICK AUF DIE WETTERDATEN ZEIGT DAS ES KEINEN KLAREN HIMMEL GEBEN WIRD SONDERN ES IST WOLKIG DIE NÄCHSTEN MONATE NEHME ICH AN BEI BEWÖLKUNG FÄLLT DAS SOWIESO NICHT AUF EINEN STRAHLEND BLAUEN HIMMEL OHNE WOLKEN WERDEN WIR UNS WOHL ABSCHMINKEN KÖNNEN FÜR DEN HERBST UND WINTER FALLS WIR DIESEN OHNE KRIEG SIND BEFÜRCHTE ICH SCHLIMMES DENN DIE ZUSAMMEN SETZUNGEN WERDEN DURCH EINE ÜBERNAHME DES ISLAM IN EUROPA HÄRTER SEIN ZIEL IST ES EINE WILLENLOSIGKEIT HER ZU STELLEN IM VERBUND VON HANDY MASTEN CHEMTRAIL UND PROPAGANDA DURCH MEDIEN DIE PLANUNG IST ZWEIGLEISIG SOLLTEN DIE NANO ROBOTIK NICHT SO FUNKTIONIEREN IST DIE WILLENLOSIGKEIT FÜR DEN ABWURF VON A- WAFFEN GEEIGNET
    SO JETZT ZU MIR DURCH DIE ENTZÜNDUNGEN IM OHR HÖRE ICH RECHTS GARNICHTS MEHR DER DURCH EINE KNALL DRUCKWELLE ABGELÖSTE HÖRKANAL HAT DA GELITTEN MAL SEHEN OB DAS WIEDER IN ORDNUNG KOMMT EUER THOMAS MIT EINEM OHR AM ARSCH DER ELITEN
    BIS MORGEN SO GOTT WILL UND GNADE HAT
    PS: IN MEINER MITTAGS RUHE GAB ES WEITERE VORFÄLLE DIE ICH MORGEN BESCHREIBEN WERDE WEGEN MEINEM AKKU STAND
    Actions GERMANY REPORT EATING NRW DEN 21..08. 2019 TIME 7 PM 12 MIN GERMANY EATING NRW STEEL BERGMANN field "SMALL ISTANBUL" START OF NO GO ZONE REPORT 2019.08.21 LIVING AFTER FUSE! OK! to 1) (TRUTH OR NOT TRUTH CONDITION BY TRANCE OF THE ILLUMINATI THE FREEMASON SATANIST SECRET ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY CHAOS IN THE NIGHT ON THE BASIS OF MY POSTAL YESTERDAY OWNER ADMINISTRATION CHEFS USW WITH DECLARATION IN THE GOAL OF THE BOSS OF EUROPE FROM THE MOSSAD AND THE DOGGY MERKEL TERMINATED THAT HE LETS ME NOW TO REVEAL HIS FACE THE LIBANESE MAFIA OF ISLAM HIGHLIGHTS THIS TOO THEN ALL THINGS WERE CALLED AGAIN, CONFIRMED, ETC. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT EVERYTHING EXACTLY EXECUTES AS I DESCRIBED HAVE THE MOST POPULAR CHAOS I NEED TO FEED IT FULL AND REPORTS I WAS NOT OUTSTANDING HOME BECAUSE OF CHEMTRAILS BY A RANDOM I COULD TAKE A CONTACT WITH US AND NATO MILITARY THEREFORE MORE DEMANDS CHEMTRAIL INQUIRY AND ANSWERS REQUESTED A POSSIBILITY TO SEE AND FOUND CHEMTRAILS TO FLY WITHOUT LEAVING THE STRIKING STRIPES IN HEAVEN DECIDED TO FLY HIGHER THAN THE CLOUDS AND INTO PUNCHES WITH ADDITIONS TO MAKE OWN CLOUDS SO THE HEAVEN NORMAL APPEAR BUT EVERY CLOUD IS ARTIFICIAL OR VACCINATED THEN THE POISONING GOES ONLY ONLY FIRED A LOOK AT THE WEATHER DATA SHOWS THAT IT WILL NOT GIVE A CLEAR HEAVY BUT IT'S CLOUDY THE NEXT MONTHS I TAKE AT CLOUDING THAT DOES NOT FALL ON A BEAMING BLUE HEAVEN WITHOUT CLOUDS WE WILL BE WELL DRAINING CAN FALL FOR THE AUTUMN AND WINTER IF WE THIS EN WITHOUT WAR, I AM FEARING THEMSELVES THAT THE COMPOSITIONS WILL BE HARDENERS THROUGH THE TAKEOVER OF ISLAM IN EUROPE. THE OBJECTIVE IS TO MAKE A UNLAWFULNESS IN THE CONNECTION OF MOBILE MASTERS CHEMTRAIL AND PROPAGANDA THROUGH MEDIA THE PLANNING IS TWICE, THE NANO ROBOTICS SHOULD NOT WORK THIS way UNLAWFUL IS SUITABLE FOR THE ABOLITION OF A-WEAPONS SO NOW TO ME BY THE INFLAMMENTS IN THE EAR I HEAR RIGHT GARNICHTS MORE OF THE TORCH THROWNED BY A BANG PRESSURE HAVE ALSO SEE WHETHER THE AGAIN IS COMING OK THOMAS WITH AN EAR TO THE ASS OF THE ELITES UNTIL TOMORROW SO GOD WANTS AND GRACE HAS PS: IN MY MIDDLE CALM, THERE WERE OTHER INCIDENTS THAT I AM TELLING MORNING WILL STAND UPON MY BATTERY Aktionen DEUTSCHLAND BERICHT ESSEN NRW DEN 21..08. 2019 ZEIT 19 UHR 12 MIN DEUTSCHLAND ESSEN NRW STAHL BERGMANN Feld "SMALL ISTANBUL" ANFANG EINER NO GO ZONE BERICHT 2019.08.21 lebendige NACH SICHERUNG! OK! zu 1) (WAHRHEIT ODER NICHT WAHRHEITSBEDINGUNG DURCH TRANCE DER ILLUMINATI DER FREIMAURER-SATANISTEN-SECRET-ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY CHAOS IN DER NACHT AUF GRUND MEINER POSTES GESTERN VERMIETER VERWALTUNG CHEFS USW MIT AUFKLÄRUNG IM GANGE DER CHEF EUROPA VOM MOSSAD UND DAS HÜNDCHEN MERKEL KÜNDIGTEN AN DAS ER MICH JETZT TÖTEN LÄSST UM SEIN GESICHT ZU WAHREN DIE LIBANESEN MAFIA DER ISLAM HOCH AUF BEGEISTERT DAS AUS ZU FÜHREN DANN WURDE ALLES WIEDER RUFEN WIEDER BESTÄTIGT USW. ES WURDE BESTÄTIGT DAS ALLES GENAU SO ABLÄUFT WIE ICH BESCHRIEBEN HABE DAS REINSTE CHAOS ICH MUSS DAS NOCHMAL NACH VOLL ZIEHEN UND BERICHTEN ICH BIN NICHT AUẞER HAUS GEWESEN WEGEN CHEMTRAILS DURCH EINEN ZUFALL KONNTE ICH EIN GESPRÄCH MIT HÖREN US UND NATO MILITÄR DA IMMER MEHR ANFRAGEN WEGEN CHEMTRAIL EINGEHEN UND ANTWORTEN FORDERN WURDE EINE MÖGLICHKEIT GESUCHT UND GEFUNDEN WEITER CHEMTRAILS ZU FLIEGEN OHNE DIE AUFFÄLLIGEN STREIFEN AM HIMMEL ZU HINTERLASSEN BESCHLOSSEN WURDE HÖHER ALS DIE WOLKEN ZU FLIEGEN UND IN STÖẞEN MIT ZUSÄTZEN EIGENE WOLKEN ZU BILDEN SO DAS DER HIMMEL NORMAL ERSCHEINEN ABER JEDE WOLKE IST KÜNSTLICH ODER GEIMPFT ALSO DIE VERGIFTUNG GEHT WEITER NUR GETARNT EIN BLICK AUF DIE WETTERDATEN ZEIGT DAS ES KEINEN KLAREN HIMMEL GEBEN WIRD SONDERN ES IST WOLKIG DIE NÄCHSTEN MONATE NEHME ICH AN BEI BEWÖLKUNG FÄLLT DAS SOWIESO NICHT AUF EINEN STRAHLEND BLAUEN HIMMEL OHNE WOLKEN WERDEN WIR UNS WOHL ABSCHMINKEN KÖNNEN FÜR DEN HERBST UND WINTER FALLS WIR DIESEN OHNE KRIEG SIND BEFÜRCHTE ICH SCHLIMMES DENN DIE ZUSAMMEN SETZUNGEN WERDEN DURCH EINE ÜBERNAHME DES ISLAM IN EUROPA HÄRTER SEIN ZIEL IST ES EINE WILLENLOSIGKEIT HER ZU STELLEN IM VERBUND VON HANDY MASTEN CHEMTRAIL UND PROPAGANDA DURCH MEDIEN DIE PLANUNG IST ZWEIGLEISIG SOLLTEN DIE NANO ROBOTIK NICHT SO FUNKTIONIEREN IST DIE WILLENLOSIGKEIT FÜR DEN ABWURF VON A- WAFFEN GEEIGNET SO JETZT ZU MIR DURCH DIE ENTZÜNDUNGEN IM OHR HÖRE ICH RECHTS GARNICHTS MEHR DER DURCH EINE KNALL DRUCKWELLE ABGELÖSTE HÖRKANAL HAT DA GELITTEN MAL SEHEN OB DAS WIEDER IN ORDNUNG KOMMT EUER THOMAS MIT EINEM OHR AM ARSCH DER ELITEN BIS MORGEN SO GOTT WILL UND GNADE HAT PS: IN MEINER MITTAGS RUHE GAB ES WEITERE VORFÄLLE DIE ICH MORGEN BESCHREIBEN WERDE WEGEN MEINEM AKKU STAND
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Hello,

    Please join hands with me in a “A NOBLE CAUSE - MAKE OUR PLAENET EARTH MORE SUSTAINABLE”

    All positive efforts towards this objective will be recognized and paid off in due course:

    Please check and sign up: https://bUnited.com/invite/BBRQ-1675/05/

    Also, you are requested to invite your friends and dear ones to join this campaign.

    Let us be united!!! Let us help the world!!!

    Thanks and regards
    Hello, Please join hands with me in a “A NOBLE CAUSE - MAKE OUR PLAENET EARTH MORE SUSTAINABLE” All positive efforts towards this objective will be recognized and paid off in due course: Please check and sign up: https://bUnited.com/invite/BBRQ-1675/05/ Also, you are requested to invite your friends and dear ones to join this campaign. Let us be united!!! Let us help the world!!! Thanks and regards
    Get Paid to Save Our Planet
    Get paid to invite friends to save the planet with you. bUnited is for everyone. And it’s for free.
    BUNITED.COM
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Hello,

    A Green Protocol Invitation to join hands with “bUnited”, a social effort, to maintain our earth more greener and safer to live in.

    All positive efforts towards this objective will be recognized and paid off in due course:

    Please check and sign up: https://bUnited.com/invite/BBRQ-1675/05/

    Be a part of this humble effort to keep our earth from further deteriorating. Also, you are requested to invite your friends and dear ones join the campaign.

    Let us be united!!!

    Thanks and regards
    Hello, A Green Protocol Invitation to join hands with “bUnited”, a social effort, to maintain our earth more greener and safer to live in. All positive efforts towards this objective will be recognized and paid off in due course: Please check and sign up: https://bUnited.com/invite/BBRQ-1675/05/ Be a part of this humble effort to keep our earth from further deteriorating. Also, you are requested to invite your friends and dear ones join the campaign. Let us be united!!! Thanks and regards
    Get Paid to Save Our Planet
    Get paid to invite friends to save the planet with you. bUnited is for everyone. And it’s for free.
    BUNITED.COM
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • "This is objectively hilarious.

    But is she just pandering to black people? Because that would be stupid. Black people don’t remember a thing that happened five years ago.

    Or does she think white people believe Michael Brown was “murdered”?

    Are there white people who believe that?" - Andrew Anglin

    https://dailystormer.name/elizabeth-warren-doubles-down-on-insane-lie-that-michael-brown-was-murdered/
    "This is objectively hilarious. But is she just pandering to black people? Because that would be stupid. Black people don’t remember a thing that happened five years ago. Or does she think white people believe Michael Brown was “murdered”? Are there white people who believe that?" - Andrew Anglin https://dailystormer.name/elizabeth-warren-doubles-down-on-insane-lie-that-michael-brown-was-murdered/
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • "How do we know that he just didn’t hate Walmart? 

    Americans have been wanting to shoot up Walmarts and the people who shop there for years now, and it has nothing to do with the Jewish stranglehold over our country or our feral brownskin population.

    Walmart is just an objectively bad place that destroys towns and people’s lives." - Roy Batty

    https://dailystormer.name/shitposter-arrested-for-posting-well-known-shooter-meme/
    "How do we know that he just didn’t hate Walmart?  Americans have been wanting to shoot up Walmarts and the people who shop there for years now, and it has nothing to do with the Jewish stranglehold over our country or our feral brownskin population. Walmart is just an objectively bad place that destroys towns and people’s lives." - Roy Batty https://dailystormer.name/shitposter-arrested-for-posting-well-known-shooter-meme/
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares

No results to show

No results to show

No results to show

No results to show