• Actions
    GERMANY REPORT

    EATING NRW DEN
    25.09. 2019

    TIME 8 PM 04 MIN

    GERMANY
    EATING NRW STEEL
    BERGMANN field "
    SMALL ISTANBUL "START OF NO GO ZONE
    REPORT 25.09.2019
    LIVING AFTER FUSE! OK!
    to 1) (TRUTH OR NOT TRUTH CONDITION BY TRANCE OF THE ILLUMINATI OF THE FREEMASON SATANISTS SECRET ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY THE SUGGESTION IN THE NIGHT TYPICAL MK ULTRA TWO DESIGN A ROTHSCHILD STATE LAWYER OR JUDGE CORRUPT TO THE BONE SHRIE AGAIN, THEY ARE ONLY NOT IN IM KNAST BECAUSE WE COLLECT EVERYTHING THAT IT COMES TO A LIFE AND STILL COVERED A SHAPE WITH WHITE SCHMINKE ALSO SAID EVEN WHAT MORE I HAVE NOT REMAINED FROM THE NIGHT APPARENT THERE SHOWING IN BRIEF THE DEATH PENALTY WHO AGAINST THE ISLAM AND JEWS WHO IS THE WORLD RISER MERKEL NOT ONLY RECOGNIZED FOR ME IS THE ISLAM THE JEWS A SHOOTING OF GENUINE STEMS AND MERCKETS A SHINEHOUSE FLYING ONLY TOO MUCH SHUTTLE PERIOD BUT JATZT COMES WHAT OUT OF THE HOUSE HERE THERE ARE TWO ILLEGAL AND BY HOUSEHOLD PROHIBITED LAUNDRY SERVICES THE MACHINES RUN DAY AND NIGHT THE WHOLE HOUSE CLOSES THERE IS NO PAUSE IN REST OR ELSE WHAT IS NOT THINKING TO HE UTE, I HAVE COMPLAINED COMPLAINTS TO THE OWNER AND WITH DEDUCTION WHAT THE CANCERS HERE EXCEPTIONS DOES NOT COOL SKIN BEHIND THE ISLAM SALAFISTS UNO OTHER MAFIA DRECK A FEW DAYS I GIVE TIME AND THEN IS LESS THAN THE HALF OF THE RENT TO BE TRANSFERRED TO ME TODAY WAS BETTER BUT ONLY ONE HOUR LONG SHIT SAVE I AT LEAST THE DISTANCES OF FIBER SCHÜBE LONGER WERE TODAY I HAVE FOUND A VIDEO ON VK THE METAMATERIALS TO TARNING SHOWS COMING IN MY CASE IN ABOUT BUT CAN NOT TELL EVERYTHING WHEN I SHADE AND INFLUENCE SEE LIGHT SHOOTING USW WEAPONS AND NO REPUTATION OR BLOOD SEE A FEW TIMES IT HAS BEEN COMPLETED I REPEATED I FEEL THAT IS MORE SATANIAN OR ANOTHER BETTER TECHNIQUE THEN THEN QUANTUM CRACKS REALIZED AND NO DIRECT MATTER
    UNTIL TOMORROW SO GOD WANTS AND GRACE HAS
    https://vk.com/video350976528_456246354

    aktionen
    DEUTSCHLAND BERICHT

    ESSEN NRW DEN
    25.09. 2019

    ZEIT 20 UHR 04 MIN

    DEUTSCHLAND
    ESSEN NRW STAHL
    BERGMANN Feld "
    KLEINE ISTANBUL" ANFANG EINER NO GO ZONE
    BERICHT 25.09.2019
    lebendige NACH SICHERUNG! OK!
    zu 1) (WAHRHEIT ODER NICHT WAHRHEITSBEDINGUNG DURCH TRANCE DER ILLUMINATI DER FREIMAURER-SATANISTEN-SECRET-ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY DIE SUGGESTION IN DER NACHT TYPISCH MK ULTRA ZWEI GESTALTEN EIN ROTHSCHILD STAATS ANWALT ODER RICHTER KORRUPT BIS IN DIE KNOCHEN SCHRIE WIEDER SIE SIND NUR NOCH NICHT IM KNAST WEIL WIR ALLES SAMMELN DAMIT ES ZU EINEM LEBENSLÄNGLICH KOMMT UND NOCH EINE GESTALT GANZ MIT WEIẞER SCHMINKE ÜBERZOGEN SAGTE AUCH NOCH WAS MEHR HABE ICH NICHT BEHALTEN VON DER NACHT ANSCHEINEND GIBT ES IN KÜRZE DIE TODESSTRAFE WER GEGEN DEN ISLAM UND JUDEN IST WER DIE WELTHERRSCHERIN MERKEL NICHT AN ERKENNT NUN FÜR MICH IST DER ISLAM DIE JUDEN EIN SCHEIẞHAUFEN DER FÜRCHTERLICH STINKT UND MERKEL EINE SCHEIẞHAUS FLIEGE DIE NUR ZU GERNE SCHEIẞE FRIST ABER JATZT KOMMT WAS AUS DEM HAUS HIER GIBT ES ZWEI ILLEGALE UND NACH HAUSORDNUNG VERBOTENE WÄSCHE SERVICES DIE MASCHIENEN LAUFEN TAG UND NACHT DAS GANZE HAUS DRÖHNT ES GIBT KEINE PAUSEN AN RUHE ODER SONST WAS IST NICHT ZU DENKEN HEUTE HABE ICH BESCHWERDE GESCHRIEBEN AN DEN VERMIETER UND MIT ABZUG VERANLASST WAS SICH DIE KANAKEN HIER RAUSNEHMEN GEHT AUF KEINE KUH HAUT DAHINTER STECKT DER ISLAM SALAFISTEN UN SONSTIGER MAFIA DRECK EINE PAAR TAGE GEBE ICH ZEIT UND DANN IST WENIGER ALS DIE HÄLFTE DER MIETE ZU ÜBERWEISEN MIR GING ES HEUTE BESSER ABER NUR SO EINE STUNDE LANG SCHEIẞE SAGE ICH MAL WENIGSTENS SIND DIE ABSTÄNDE DER FIBER SCHÜBE LÄNGER GEWORDEN HEUTE HABE ICH EIN VIDEO AUF VK GEFUNDEN DAS METAMATERRIALIEN ZUR TARNUNG ZEIGT KOMMT IN MEINEN FALL IN ETWA HIN LÄSST ABER NICHT ALLES ERKLÄREN ZUMAL WENN ICH SCHATTEN UND UMRISSE SEHE LICHTSCHLIEREN USW WAFFEN EINSETZE UND KEINEN WIEDERSTAND SPÜRE ODER BLUT SEHE EIN PAAR MAL IST ES VORGEKOMMEN DAS ICH WIEDERSTAND SPÜRTE ICH DENKE DAS IST DOCH MEHR SATANISCH ODER EINE NOCH BESSERE TECHNIK DIE DANN QUANTEN SPRÜNGE REALISIERT UND KEINE DIREKT FESTE MATERIE BILDET
    BIS MORGEN SO GOTT WILL UND GNADE HAT
    https://vk.com/video350976528_456246354
    Actions GERMANY REPORT EATING NRW DEN 25.09. 2019 TIME 8 PM 04 MIN GERMANY EATING NRW STEEL BERGMANN field " SMALL ISTANBUL "START OF NO GO ZONE REPORT 25.09.2019 LIVING AFTER FUSE! OK! to 1) (TRUTH OR NOT TRUTH CONDITION BY TRANCE OF THE ILLUMINATI OF THE FREEMASON SATANISTS SECRET ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY THE SUGGESTION IN THE NIGHT TYPICAL MK ULTRA TWO DESIGN A ROTHSCHILD STATE LAWYER OR JUDGE CORRUPT TO THE BONE SHRIE AGAIN, THEY ARE ONLY NOT IN IM KNAST BECAUSE WE COLLECT EVERYTHING THAT IT COMES TO A LIFE AND STILL COVERED A SHAPE WITH WHITE SCHMINKE ALSO SAID EVEN WHAT MORE I HAVE NOT REMAINED FROM THE NIGHT APPARENT THERE SHOWING IN BRIEF THE DEATH PENALTY WHO AGAINST THE ISLAM AND JEWS WHO IS THE WORLD RISER MERKEL NOT ONLY RECOGNIZED FOR ME IS THE ISLAM THE JEWS A SHOOTING OF GENUINE STEMS AND MERCKETS A SHINEHOUSE FLYING ONLY TOO MUCH SHUTTLE PERIOD BUT JATZT COMES WHAT OUT OF THE HOUSE HERE THERE ARE TWO ILLEGAL AND BY HOUSEHOLD PROHIBITED LAUNDRY SERVICES THE MACHINES RUN DAY AND NIGHT THE WHOLE HOUSE CLOSES THERE IS NO PAUSE IN REST OR ELSE WHAT IS NOT THINKING TO HE UTE, I HAVE COMPLAINED COMPLAINTS TO THE OWNER AND WITH DEDUCTION WHAT THE CANCERS HERE EXCEPTIONS DOES NOT COOL SKIN BEHIND THE ISLAM SALAFISTS UNO OTHER MAFIA DRECK A FEW DAYS I GIVE TIME AND THEN IS LESS THAN THE HALF OF THE RENT TO BE TRANSFERRED TO ME TODAY WAS BETTER BUT ONLY ONE HOUR LONG SHIT SAVE I AT LEAST THE DISTANCES OF FIBER SCHÜBE LONGER WERE TODAY I HAVE FOUND A VIDEO ON VK THE METAMATERIALS TO TARNING SHOWS COMING IN MY CASE IN ABOUT BUT CAN NOT TELL EVERYTHING WHEN I SHADE AND INFLUENCE SEE LIGHT SHOOTING USW WEAPONS AND NO REPUTATION OR BLOOD SEE A FEW TIMES IT HAS BEEN COMPLETED I REPEATED I FEEL THAT IS MORE SATANIAN OR ANOTHER BETTER TECHNIQUE THEN THEN QUANTUM CRACKS REALIZED AND NO DIRECT MATTER UNTIL TOMORROW SO GOD WANTS AND GRACE HAS https://vk.com/video350976528_456246354 aktionen DEUTSCHLAND BERICHT ESSEN NRW DEN 25.09. 2019 ZEIT 20 UHR 04 MIN DEUTSCHLAND ESSEN NRW STAHL BERGMANN Feld " KLEINE ISTANBUL" ANFANG EINER NO GO ZONE BERICHT 25.09.2019 lebendige NACH SICHERUNG! OK! zu 1) (WAHRHEIT ODER NICHT WAHRHEITSBEDINGUNG DURCH TRANCE DER ILLUMINATI DER FREIMAURER-SATANISTEN-SECRET-ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY DIE SUGGESTION IN DER NACHT TYPISCH MK ULTRA ZWEI GESTALTEN EIN ROTHSCHILD STAATS ANWALT ODER RICHTER KORRUPT BIS IN DIE KNOCHEN SCHRIE WIEDER SIE SIND NUR NOCH NICHT IM KNAST WEIL WIR ALLES SAMMELN DAMIT ES ZU EINEM LEBENSLÄNGLICH KOMMT UND NOCH EINE GESTALT GANZ MIT WEIẞER SCHMINKE ÜBERZOGEN SAGTE AUCH NOCH WAS MEHR HABE ICH NICHT BEHALTEN VON DER NACHT ANSCHEINEND GIBT ES IN KÜRZE DIE TODESSTRAFE WER GEGEN DEN ISLAM UND JUDEN IST WER DIE WELTHERRSCHERIN MERKEL NICHT AN ERKENNT NUN FÜR MICH IST DER ISLAM DIE JUDEN EIN SCHEIẞHAUFEN DER FÜRCHTERLICH STINKT UND MERKEL EINE SCHEIẞHAUS FLIEGE DIE NUR ZU GERNE SCHEIẞE FRIST ABER JATZT KOMMT WAS AUS DEM HAUS HIER GIBT ES ZWEI ILLEGALE UND NACH HAUSORDNUNG VERBOTENE WÄSCHE SERVICES DIE MASCHIENEN LAUFEN TAG UND NACHT DAS GANZE HAUS DRÖHNT ES GIBT KEINE PAUSEN AN RUHE ODER SONST WAS IST NICHT ZU DENKEN HEUTE HABE ICH BESCHWERDE GESCHRIEBEN AN DEN VERMIETER UND MIT ABZUG VERANLASST WAS SICH DIE KANAKEN HIER RAUSNEHMEN GEHT AUF KEINE KUH HAUT DAHINTER STECKT DER ISLAM SALAFISTEN UN SONSTIGER MAFIA DRECK EINE PAAR TAGE GEBE ICH ZEIT UND DANN IST WENIGER ALS DIE HÄLFTE DER MIETE ZU ÜBERWEISEN MIR GING ES HEUTE BESSER ABER NUR SO EINE STUNDE LANG SCHEIẞE SAGE ICH MAL WENIGSTENS SIND DIE ABSTÄNDE DER FIBER SCHÜBE LÄNGER GEWORDEN HEUTE HABE ICH EIN VIDEO AUF VK GEFUNDEN DAS METAMATERRIALIEN ZUR TARNUNG ZEIGT KOMMT IN MEINEN FALL IN ETWA HIN LÄSST ABER NICHT ALLES ERKLÄREN ZUMAL WENN ICH SCHATTEN UND UMRISSE SEHE LICHTSCHLIEREN USW WAFFEN EINSETZE UND KEINEN WIEDERSTAND SPÜRE ODER BLUT SEHE EIN PAAR MAL IST ES VORGEKOMMEN DAS ICH WIEDERSTAND SPÜRTE ICH DENKE DAS IST DOCH MEHR SATANISCH ODER EINE NOCH BESSERE TECHNIK DIE DANN QUANTEN SPRÜNGE REALISIERT UND KEINE DIREKT FESTE MATERIE BILDET BIS MORGEN SO GOTT WILL UND GNADE HAT https://vk.com/video350976528_456246354
    Hammer!.
    VK.COM
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • cat5 cable for ip camera, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    We provide the power supply accessories and wires at reliable prices. To get the best variety of cat5 power supply devices for cameras Visit our website below.
    https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cat5-cat6-power-supply-tools/cables.html

    Video Intercom System for Home, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    Our experts provide a video intercom system for home and apartment at EOS Australia. Here we provide different types of intercom systems for home and business. To know more about us, visit our website below
    https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/video-intercoms/residential-intercoms/golmar-smart-video-intercoms-android-ios.html
    Home intercom for Security, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    At EOS Australia, we provide affordable intercom system for home security. Here we offer different types of intercom systems. For more information, our products visit our website below.
    https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/video-intercoms/residential-intercoms/golmar-smart-video-intercoms-android-ios.html
    Wireless intercom for House, Sydney., Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    At EOS Australia, we give quality wireless intercom systems for house and apartment at inexpensive prices. Our experts provide the best quality security systems include video intercom, CCTV accessories, cat5 cable, and more. For more details, call us now.
    https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cctv/accessories.html
    Smartphone Video Intercom system,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    If you are searching for a smartphone video intercom system at best prices, then contact at EOS Australia. Here we provide many types of intercom system for home and business.

    Home security Camera system,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    If you are looking for a security camera system for home, then you are the right place. At EOS Australia, we provide safe and quality security systems. For more information about us, visit our website!
    https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cctv/wisenet-hanwha-techwin-samsung.html
    Wisenet NVR Security System,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    Are you need to buy wisenet NVR security products at affordable prices? Then EOS Australia is the best option for you. Keep your apartment or business secure with our wisenet NVR security system. Search our website for more details.
    https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cctv/vms-video-management/software-ip-video-surveillance/wisenet-wave-vms-made-for-you.html
    Monitor For CCTV system,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    Are you looking for the best quality monitor for CCTV system at reliable prices in NSW? Then contact at EOS Australia. Here we provide all types of security systems for home and business. Contact us for more details!
    https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cctv/surveillance-monitors.html
    EOS Australia is company for CCTV, IP intercoms from Wisenet, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    At EOS Australia, we provide reliable IP intercom systems. Explore our website and shop our best selection of video intercom security system today.For over 25 years we've been striving to provide new innovative products along with exceptional service, offering security solutions for all applications and industries. Our company has earned the reputation of the leading innovative solution provider for Video surveillance, Access controls & Intercoms, for both domestic and commercial markets.
    Belows are some examples of what we carry currently;
    Wisenet, Wisenet Wave, Golmar soul, Golmar smart video intercom Kit,
    Hanwha, CCTV, IP CCTV, Golmar NEXA multi, Golmar NEXA,
    Please enter our website https://www.eos.com.au/
    panasonic intercom for apartment,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide

    If you are looking for Panasonic intercom for apartment and home, then EOS Australia is the best option for you. We provide different types of a video surveillance system for both household and business markets. To know more about us visit our website below
    https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/video-intercoms/residential-intercoms/panasonic.html


    hanwha wave,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide,
    hanwha wave vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    hanwha vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    wave vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    wave vms Australia,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    wisenet wave,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    wisenet wave vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    wisenet wave Australia,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    samsung vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    samsung wave vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    golmar soul kit,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    golmar wifi kit,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    golmar soul wifi kit,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    all product cross ref table page,security wholesaler Sydney,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    security wholesaler Melbourne,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide

    security wholesaler Brisbane,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    security wholesaler Perth,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    security wholesaler Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide
    ,security distributor Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide

    https://www.eos.com.au/
    cat5 cable for ip camera, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide We provide the power supply accessories and wires at reliable prices. To get the best variety of cat5 power supply devices for cameras Visit our website below. https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cat5-cat6-power-supply-tools/cables.html Video Intercom System for Home, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide Our experts provide a video intercom system for home and apartment at EOS Australia. Here we provide different types of intercom systems for home and business. To know more about us, visit our website below https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/video-intercoms/residential-intercoms/golmar-smart-video-intercoms-android-ios.html Home intercom for Security, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide At EOS Australia, we provide affordable intercom system for home security. Here we offer different types of intercom systems. For more information, our products visit our website below. https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/video-intercoms/residential-intercoms/golmar-smart-video-intercoms-android-ios.html Wireless intercom for House, Sydney., Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide At EOS Australia, we give quality wireless intercom systems for house and apartment at inexpensive prices. Our experts provide the best quality security systems include video intercom, CCTV accessories, cat5 cable, and more. For more details, call us now. https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cctv/accessories.html Smartphone Video Intercom system,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide If you are searching for a smartphone video intercom system at best prices, then contact at EOS Australia. Here we provide many types of intercom system for home and business. Home security Camera system,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide If you are looking for a security camera system for home, then you are the right place. At EOS Australia, we provide safe and quality security systems. For more information about us, visit our website! https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cctv/wisenet-hanwha-techwin-samsung.html Wisenet NVR Security System,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide Are you need to buy wisenet NVR security products at affordable prices? Then EOS Australia is the best option for you. Keep your apartment or business secure with our wisenet NVR security system. Search our website for more details. https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cctv/vms-video-management/software-ip-video-surveillance/wisenet-wave-vms-made-for-you.html Monitor For CCTV system,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide Are you looking for the best quality monitor for CCTV system at reliable prices in NSW? Then contact at EOS Australia. Here we provide all types of security systems for home and business. Contact us for more details! https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/cctv/surveillance-monitors.html EOS Australia is company for CCTV, IP intercoms from Wisenet, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide At EOS Australia, we provide reliable IP intercom systems. Explore our website and shop our best selection of video intercom security system today.For over 25 years we've been striving to provide new innovative products along with exceptional service, offering security solutions for all applications and industries. Our company has earned the reputation of the leading innovative solution provider for Video surveillance, Access controls & Intercoms, for both domestic and commercial markets. Belows are some examples of what we carry currently; Wisenet, Wisenet Wave, Golmar soul, Golmar smart video intercom Kit, Hanwha, CCTV, IP CCTV, Golmar NEXA multi, Golmar NEXA, Please enter our website https://www.eos.com.au/ panasonic intercom for apartment,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide If you are looking for Panasonic intercom for apartment and home, then EOS Australia is the best option for you. We provide different types of a video surveillance system for both household and business markets. To know more about us visit our website below https://www.eos.com.au/security-wholesaler/video-intercoms/residential-intercoms/panasonic.html hanwha wave,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide, hanwha wave vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide hanwha vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide wave vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide wave vms Australia,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide wisenet wave,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide wisenet wave vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide wisenet wave Australia,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide samsung vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide samsung wave vms,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide golmar soul kit,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide golmar wifi kit,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide golmar soul wifi kit,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide all product cross ref table page,security wholesaler Sydney,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide security wholesaler Melbourne,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide security wholesaler Brisbane,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide security wholesaler Perth,Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide security wholesaler Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide ,security distributor Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth,Adelaide https://www.eos.com.au/
    Cat5 Cable for IP Camera - Best Power Supplies Cables
    Want the best power supplies cables? Contact us at EOS Australia today and we will find the best power supply cable for you.
    WWW.EOS.COM.AU
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • At EOS Australia, we provide reliable IP intercom systems. Explore our website and shop our best selection of video intercom security system today.For over 25 years we've been striving to provide new innovative products along with exceptional service, offering security solutions for all applications and industries. Our company has earned the reputation of the leading innovative solution provider for Video surveillance, Access controls & Intercoms, for both domestic and commercial markets.

    Belows are some examples of what we carry currently;
    Wisenet, Wisenet Wave, Golmar soul, Golmar smart video intercom Kit,
    Hanwha, CCTV, IP CCTV, Golmar NEXA multi, Golmar NEXA,
    Please enter our website https://www.eos.com.au/
    At EOS Australia, we provide reliable IP intercom systems. Explore our website and shop our best selection of video intercom security system today.For over 25 years we've been striving to provide new innovative products along with exceptional service, offering security solutions for all applications and industries. Our company has earned the reputation of the leading innovative solution provider for Video surveillance, Access controls & Intercoms, for both domestic and commercial markets. Belows are some examples of what we carry currently; Wisenet, Wisenet Wave, Golmar soul, Golmar smart video intercom Kit, Hanwha, CCTV, IP CCTV, Golmar NEXA multi, Golmar NEXA, Please enter our website https://www.eos.com.au/
    Total Security Solutions | IP CCTV | VMS | Access Control | Intercom
    EOS is an Australasia-wide leader in the design, supply, development & support of electronic for professional security solutions. Browse our website to learn more details.
    WWW.EOS.COM.AU
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The problem.

    If you think about it, what can any one person (such as a politician) do to save native white people? Apart from most not wanting to, it is impossible! We cannot do anything. Not a single person, not even the Queen can say or do anything to save native white people. As soon as you open your mouth you would be called a racist and booed and jeered and milkshaked. You would sacrifice absolutely everything you own, including all of your money, your career and your reputation.

    The solution.

    The hypothesis of the reversal of divine merit of nativism and primitivism operates or thinks in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts, therefore it determines that in order to save native white people, (for which there can be no greater glory), then we all as individuals (such as politicians) must bravely sacrifice absolutely everything that we own, including all of our money, our career and our reputation.

    Amen.

    https://politicallyinaccurate.com
    The problem. If you think about it, what can any one person (such as a politician) do to save native white people? Apart from most not wanting to, it is impossible! We cannot do anything. Not a single person, not even the Queen can say or do anything to save native white people. As soon as you open your mouth you would be called a racist and booed and jeered and milkshaked. You would sacrifice absolutely everything you own, including all of your money, your career and your reputation. The solution. The hypothesis of the reversal of divine merit of nativism and primitivism operates or thinks in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts, therefore it determines that in order to save native white people, (for which there can be no greater glory), then we all as individuals (such as politicians) must bravely sacrifice absolutely everything that we own, including all of our money, our career and our reputation. Amen. https://politicallyinaccurate.com
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://www.spreaker.com/user/10580120/reputational-investment-epstein-and-twer
    https://www.spreaker.com/user/10580120/reputational-investment-epstein-and-twer
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • ARCHAEOLOGY NEWSFLASH 796a

    THEY'RE HIDING THESE ANCIENT CAVES FROM US

    Have you ever been on a houseboat?

    This was Anne-Marie’s second vacation at Lake Powell. She looked from the houseboat. All around her the landscape was breathtaking – red desert, arches and cliffs, right to the water’s edge.

    She tossed her head and sighed. “This dam was built in a hurry. It’s a pity…”

    “What do you mean?”

    “I hope not - but some say it might collapse in a few years.”

    By the way, , if you didn’t know, Lake Powell is the second largest man-made reservoir in the United States. It was formed by building a dam across the Colorado River, in a portion of the Grand Canyon known as Glen Canyon.

    AN EXPLOSIVE SECRET?

    Here is a question for you: Does it hide an explosive secret?

    The reservoir itself is named for John Wesley Powell,a one-armed American Civil War veteran who explored the river using three wooden boats in 1869.

    On that expedition, he discovered a system of caves which contained a multitude of ancient artefacts. It is claimed that he catalogued and transported more than 20 tons of artefacts found in these caves.

    These artefacts were loaded onto a ship in San Francisco and, supposedly bound for the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, but the ship was never seen again.

    It is thought to have been (deliberately) sunk somewhere north of the far-away Mariana Islands.

    Ultimately this controversial reservoir was built over the site, covering up the artefact-filled caves from public view.

    It is alleged that among items catalogued were jade sarcophagi, copper tools annealed to a hardness which we cannot accomplish with copper today, crystal skulls, woven tapestries showing human beings riding on dinosaurs, model aircraft,electrical batteries and other artefacts of a scientifically and artistically high civilisation.

    MORE ON GRAND CANYON “EGYPTIAN” CAVE

    In a previous newsletter, I referred to another alleged discovery in the Grand Canyon.

    The Phoenix Gazette, on April 5, 1909, had released a most intriguing news report. (A full transcription of the article can be obtained locally.)

    G.A. Kinkaid, an explorer working with Professor S.A. Jordan of the Smithsonian Institution, allegedly discovered a network of caverns, artificially hewn into the side of the Grand Canyon.

    He said, “I was journeying down the Colorado river in a boat, alone, looking for mineral. Some forty-two miles up the river from the El Tovar Crystal canyon, I saw on the east wall, stains in the sedimentary formation about 2,000 feet above the river bed. There was no trail to this point, but I finally reached it with great difficulty.

    “Above a shelf which hid it from view from the river, was the mouth of the cave. There are steps leading from this entrance some thirty yards to what was, at the time the cavern was inhabited, the level of the river.”

    Now, , just think about that last statement. And I shall share with you its significance before the end of this letter.

    MUMMIES, ARTEFACTS, HIEROGLYPHICS

    Following several hundred feet of passage, the explorer found himself in a labyrinth of passages and hundreds of rooms radiating from a central point like spokes in a wheel.

    The relics seen (some of which he photographed by flashlight) were astonishing.

    There were mummies, images and artefacts of a high technology. And a grey metal resembling platinum. Everywhere he looked, hieroglyphics were to be seen.

    However, be warned. If you contact the Smithsonian Institute to ask them about their supposed role in the Grand Canyon, you will receive a polite "no records found" reply.

    WE ARE NOT TOLD

    Ancient Egyptians in Arizona? Oh, come off it! The Egyptians did not explore the Americas, everyone knows that, and it is not taught in any school.

    Of course, we thought this also of the ancient Romans, until ancient Roman headgear, armour, swords, coins and other artefacts were found just North of Tucson, not far from the Interstate 10 highway!

    It’s an intriguing report. But the point to be made is the elevation of this site some 2,000 feet above the present river bed, with steps leading a short distance to what must have been at that time the level of the river.

    RANGER’S CLAIM

    A retired Grand Canyon Ranger claims to have seen ancient, worn steps carved into the solid rock, midway up a 1500 foot cliff.

    MORE RECENT NEWS

    More recently, two backpackers who entered the Grand Canyon claimed that an elevation of some 800 feet, they saw several cave entrances, just as reported in the newspaper article.

    But the entrances all seemed to be sealed shut or destroyed, as if to keep everyone out.

    (This raises the question, Why would anyone want to deliberately seal off caves in such a remote area, so difficult of access?)

    Being expert rock climbers, the two men climbed toward the most promising looking cave entrance.

    Upon reaching the entrance they discovered that, several feet in, it had likewise been sealed off with native rock. The entrance itself appeared to be man made. A 6 foot circular pattern was clearly hewn into the ceiling.

    TANTALISING QUESTIONS

    The question arises, if the newspaper article was a mere hoax, then what did these more recent backpackers stumble upon? And why were the entrances to such extremely remote caves sealed?

    And something else. The backpacker’s discovery was made at least 40 miles from the location given in the newspaper article. (The site can be seen from the South Rim visitors areas.)

    So, if the newspaper report was not a hoax, and the backpackers had found the real location, could the newspaper location have been misinformation to keep people away?

    An email informant, known only as "W M", brings to light yet more significant clues. This person apparently knows the location of the “temple” cave site as told in the 1909 newspaper article, and has been there within the last 15 years.

    He and others researched the "S.A. Jordan" that is mentioned in the 1909 article, and found aS.A. Jordon ( "o", not an "a" ) mentioned in a rare limited edition of the Smithsonian Scientific Series of that era.

    Apparently Jordon was an esteemed European field archaeologist (not from Idaho, as mentioned in the 1909 newspaper article (dis-information?) who was contracted by the Smithsonian.

    This respected institution has a reputation for suppressing archaeological evidence which may threaten the orthodox scientific stance.

    I should warn you. The trip is extremely arduous and requires at least six days of backpacking in some of the most challenging terrain on the planet.

    If you are interested in doing some exploring yourself, you might contact the "Back Country" information line (520-638-7875) at the Grand Canyon, where permits are bought for backpacking and extended hikes, both on and off trails. there are no trails to it. But will they confirm these reports? Unless it is politically correct, don’t hold your breath…

    CANYON’S VAST AGE - A MYTH

    But the point is this, If the Jordan news report is genuine, then those early Egyptian-style visitors were in a canyon whose water run-off was still copious.

    They were there in the first few centuries after the Flood, with the Flood-laid sediments still relatively soft – and easily erodible.

    So that in the few millennia since that time, the river was able to drop anything up to
    2,000 feet lower, cutting down through the soft sediment. Or 800 feet lower. It doesn’t matter how much. It has not taken millions of years.

    Yes, we’re talking about the trapped Flood waters left behind as giant “Flood puddles” or inland lakes on the continents, and later their retreat, and the consequent drying out just a few thousand years ago.

    This means that the vast age of the Grand Canyon is just another myth.

    Believe it, the evidence is overwhelming, that there are people in high places with almost unlimited finances who are engineering a deliberate campaign to keep the truth from us.

    With this agenda driving them, they have seized control of the education system, the media and the entertainment industry as well.

    This is not a conspiracy theory. It is FACT.

    They have been deceiving us for too long. And if you're like me you'll want to know the truth.

    So now, much of the information they are so desperate to suppress, I have managed to record for you on DVD.

    In fact, it is one of a special 12-DVD set I have put together for you to enjoy.

    The result is these 12 surprise-packed DVDs:

    - 9 from my own special 28-night seminar series
    - 3 from Dr Robert Gentry’s shocking, cutting-edge revelations that are startling the scientific world.

    I make no apology for sharing this information. How else will you know about it?

    You will hold in your hands pure dynamite – powerful knowledge you can share with others! And what does it include?:

    1. DEAD MEN'S SECRETS – (c.60 mins.)
    * Surprising Discoveries in lost cities of the dead.
    * China's secret pyramids.
    * Egypt's royal tomb shock.
    * Lost technology.
    * Ancient skeletons radioactive.
    * Mystery tunnels where doors snap shut behind you.
    * City of the dead, that no outsider saw for 1,500 years.

    2. EUROPE'S COMING COLLAPSE – (c.60 mins.)
    * Is something really big soon to occur in Europe and the world?
    * Learn of the persistent prophecy that powerful men have tried to break – and WHY.
    * Know WHY the European Community will collapse.
    * This surprising prophecy begins in Iraq... and it’s a biblical prediction sealed by subsequent historical events.


    3. FINGERPRINTS OF CREATION – (33 mins.)
    * The IMPOSSIBLE discovery in the Earth’s foundation rocks: Stunning, beautiful polonium haloes frozen into granite.
    * Did you know that the radioactive decay of primordial polonium can last only a few minutes? But if granites originated in a molten state and cooled over millions of years, such radioactive haloes could never have been captured – they would have decayed long before the rock solidified.
    * Dr Gentry’s startling scientific evidence of – hold your breath - an instant creation of the Earth!!!
    * Before saying no, no, no – you’d better see this! You may never think the same again. This discovery has been put to the world’s leading scientists – and they are dumbfounded.

    4. HOW YOUNG IS THE EARTH? – (76 mins.)
    * Amazing scientific evidence that the sedimentary layers comprising the Grand Canyon were deposited quickly instead of slowly
    * Startling scientific data that granites, the foundation rocks of the Earth, formed rapidly instead of by slow cooling
    * Astonishing evidence that coal and oil can form rapidly, and did so recently
    * That dinosaurs lived not millions of years ago, but recently
    * Where does all this leave our evolution theory?
    * See for yourself Dr Gentry’s breathtaking bombshells

    5. CENTRE OF THE UNIVERSE –
    THE GREAT WHITE THRONE? –(37min.)
    * In this suspense filled presentation Drs Robert and David Gentry reveal the amazing astronomical discovery that the universe has a nearby centre that can be identified.
    * Many wonder: Is the universe a cosmic accident?
    * Or is there a heretofore undeciphered message in the sky from the Creator Himself?
    * Your head will spin at this cutting edge discovery!

    6. SECRETS OF THE PYRAMIDS - (c.60 mins.)
    * Amazing scientific discoveries about the Great Pyramid
    * And astonishing prophecies carried by all the major civilisations of antiquity concerning a coming Messiah.
    * Discover the man who wrote his own autobiography before he was born. Yes, his AUTO-biography! Impossible? You’d better see this before you dismiss it.
    * Have you heard of the most amazing day in history - when 40 prophecies were fulfilled in 24 hours?
    * Yes, I agree, this is uncanny… startling… breath-taking information. And it may even lead you to wonder: Does an unseen hand move in our affairs today?

    7. UFO ALIENS: THE DEADLY SECRET – (c.60 mins.)
    * Are malicious entities posing as aliens from outer space?
    * Do these entities have an agenda?
    * What are UFOs - really?
    * Where are they from?
    * What about abductions? (Only one class of people on earth is exempt. Who are they?)
    * Did aliens really bring civilization to Planet Earth?
    * Who are the sinister Legion of Lucifer?
    * What is the occult connection?
    * How you can survive the plotted takeover.

    8. ASTOUNDING WONDERS OF THE STARRY SKY – (c. 60 mins.)
    * See the “gleaming gateway to paradise” – photographic beauties of the gigantic “open space” corridor in the nebula of Orion - see undreamed of glories in the skies you will never forget.
    * A colossal city in space?
    * Is there a Heaven – if so, what and where is it?
    * Is there an after-life?
    * Will we know each other?
    * Will people be real, with flesh and bones?
    * How will you spend your time?
    * Information to thrill your soul... and give you hope for your future!

    9. WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE DINOSAURS? - (c. 60 mins.)
    * Alleged sightings - fact or fake?
    * FRESH RED BLOOD CELLS found in dinosaur remains – what does this mean?
    * Also: Learn about the discovery that's toppling evolution.
    * Thrill to the amazing DNA code’s “sentences” and “instruction books” - identical to human language
    * Was there really a clever plot to use "evolution" to destroy Western society?
    * Learn of the scientific bombshell that is set to devastate evolution.

    10. TSUNAMIS, TERRORISM, EARTHQUAKES…
    WHAT’S COMING? WHO’S NEXT? - (c. 60 mins.)
    * Archaeology confirms a most amazing event-by-event ancient prediction.
    * Discover prophecies 2,000 years old, that are coming to pass AT THIS MOMENT!
    * A million city folk die – and a small group is saved by acting on a prophecy.
    * AGAINST ALL ODDS - AN AMAZING ESCAPE FROM DEATH
    * And the prophecy continues, step by step… What is ahead, for our day? This will make your spine tingle.
    * Does this prophecy have apocalyptic implications?

    11. SKEPTICISM BEATEN BY A PROPHECY - (c. 60 mins.)
    * A dead body... a torn curtain… and a rabbi's curse.
    * Learn about a prophecy, uncanny in its fulfilment, that religious leaders tried desperately to suppress.
    * Discover an event that was prophesied in the Hebrew writings to the precise year... month... day... and hour - 600 years before it happened.
    * Jonathan Gray’s challenge to every skeptic: disprove this astonishing prophecy if you can!

    12. HOW TO TAP UNLIMITED SPIRITUAL POWER - (c. 60 mins.)
    * How to influence your boss... your spouse... and others around you... with this forgotten, but proven success key.
    * Something else: what is all this talk we hear about being born again? Can one really be born again? It sounds weird, right? But is but possible? If so, how?
    * “Saved” and “lost” – what on earth do these terms mean… really? Okay, let’s discover 9 ways to tell if you're one or the other.
    * And here are some practical tips on day-to-day living: How to unlock the key to spiritual success.

    So there you have it, – some very non-mainstream stuff – but backed up with a good measure of common sense and firm evidence.

    I guarantee you, some of the information in these 12 new DVDs will leave you amazed… breathless… and stunned!

    Only a limited number of people will be successful in getting this special set at a big reduction. But I shall keep the door open all this week.

    To claim your personal set please go to http://www.beforeus.com/dvds-12-set.html

    In any case, I wish you a healthy, prosperous, and enjoyable week ahead.

    Best regards,
    Jonathan Gray
    info@archaeologyanswers.com


    ------------------------------------------------------
    Please tell your friends
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Have you been enjoying the archaeology newsletters? If you know someone who would find these facts interesting, Click the URL below now to tell them, or copy and paste the URL below into your browser. http://www.beforeus.com
    ======================================================
    If you have any questions, please email me at info@archaeologyanswers.com
    ======================================================
    International explorer, archaeologist and author Jonathan Gray has travelled the world to gather data on ancient mysteries. He has penetrated some largely unexplored areas, including parts of the Amazon headwaters. The author has also led expeditions to the bottom of the sea and to remote mountain and desert regions of the world. He lectures internationally.
    ======================================================
    ARCHAEOLOGY NEWSFLASH 796a THEY'RE HIDING THESE ANCIENT CAVES FROM US Have you ever been on a houseboat? This was Anne-Marie’s second vacation at Lake Powell. She looked from the houseboat. All around her the landscape was breathtaking – red desert, arches and cliffs, right to the water’s edge. She tossed her head and sighed. “This dam was built in a hurry. It’s a pity…” “What do you mean?” “I hope not - but some say it might collapse in a few years.” By the way, , if you didn’t know, Lake Powell is the second largest man-made reservoir in the United States. It was formed by building a dam across the Colorado River, in a portion of the Grand Canyon known as Glen Canyon. AN EXPLOSIVE SECRET? Here is a question for you: Does it hide an explosive secret? The reservoir itself is named for John Wesley Powell,a one-armed American Civil War veteran who explored the river using three wooden boats in 1869. On that expedition, he discovered a system of caves which contained a multitude of ancient artefacts. It is claimed that he catalogued and transported more than 20 tons of artefacts found in these caves. These artefacts were loaded onto a ship in San Francisco and, supposedly bound for the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, but the ship was never seen again. It is thought to have been (deliberately) sunk somewhere north of the far-away Mariana Islands. Ultimately this controversial reservoir was built over the site, covering up the artefact-filled caves from public view. It is alleged that among items catalogued were jade sarcophagi, copper tools annealed to a hardness which we cannot accomplish with copper today, crystal skulls, woven tapestries showing human beings riding on dinosaurs, model aircraft,electrical batteries and other artefacts of a scientifically and artistically high civilisation. MORE ON GRAND CANYON “EGYPTIAN” CAVE In a previous newsletter, I referred to another alleged discovery in the Grand Canyon. The Phoenix Gazette, on April 5, 1909, had released a most intriguing news report. (A full transcription of the article can be obtained locally.) G.A. Kinkaid, an explorer working with Professor S.A. Jordan of the Smithsonian Institution, allegedly discovered a network of caverns, artificially hewn into the side of the Grand Canyon. He said, “I was journeying down the Colorado river in a boat, alone, looking for mineral. Some forty-two miles up the river from the El Tovar Crystal canyon, I saw on the east wall, stains in the sedimentary formation about 2,000 feet above the river bed. There was no trail to this point, but I finally reached it with great difficulty. “Above a shelf which hid it from view from the river, was the mouth of the cave. There are steps leading from this entrance some thirty yards to what was, at the time the cavern was inhabited, the level of the river.” Now, , just think about that last statement. And I shall share with you its significance before the end of this letter. MUMMIES, ARTEFACTS, HIEROGLYPHICS Following several hundred feet of passage, the explorer found himself in a labyrinth of passages and hundreds of rooms radiating from a central point like spokes in a wheel. The relics seen (some of which he photographed by flashlight) were astonishing. There were mummies, images and artefacts of a high technology. And a grey metal resembling platinum. Everywhere he looked, hieroglyphics were to be seen. However, be warned. If you contact the Smithsonian Institute to ask them about their supposed role in the Grand Canyon, you will receive a polite "no records found" reply. WE ARE NOT TOLD Ancient Egyptians in Arizona? Oh, come off it! The Egyptians did not explore the Americas, everyone knows that, and it is not taught in any school. Of course, we thought this also of the ancient Romans, until ancient Roman headgear, armour, swords, coins and other artefacts were found just North of Tucson, not far from the Interstate 10 highway! It’s an intriguing report. But the point to be made is the elevation of this site some 2,000 feet above the present river bed, with steps leading a short distance to what must have been at that time the level of the river. RANGER’S CLAIM A retired Grand Canyon Ranger claims to have seen ancient, worn steps carved into the solid rock, midway up a 1500 foot cliff. MORE RECENT NEWS More recently, two backpackers who entered the Grand Canyon claimed that an elevation of some 800 feet, they saw several cave entrances, just as reported in the newspaper article. But the entrances all seemed to be sealed shut or destroyed, as if to keep everyone out. (This raises the question, Why would anyone want to deliberately seal off caves in such a remote area, so difficult of access?) Being expert rock climbers, the two men climbed toward the most promising looking cave entrance. Upon reaching the entrance they discovered that, several feet in, it had likewise been sealed off with native rock. The entrance itself appeared to be man made. A 6 foot circular pattern was clearly hewn into the ceiling. TANTALISING QUESTIONS The question arises, if the newspaper article was a mere hoax, then what did these more recent backpackers stumble upon? And why were the entrances to such extremely remote caves sealed? And something else. The backpacker’s discovery was made at least 40 miles from the location given in the newspaper article. (The site can be seen from the South Rim visitors areas.) So, if the newspaper report was not a hoax, and the backpackers had found the real location, could the newspaper location have been misinformation to keep people away? An email informant, known only as "W M", brings to light yet more significant clues. This person apparently knows the location of the “temple” cave site as told in the 1909 newspaper article, and has been there within the last 15 years. He and others researched the "S.A. Jordan" that is mentioned in the 1909 article, and found aS.A. Jordon ( "o", not an "a" ) mentioned in a rare limited edition of the Smithsonian Scientific Series of that era. Apparently Jordon was an esteemed European field archaeologist (not from Idaho, as mentioned in the 1909 newspaper article (dis-information?) who was contracted by the Smithsonian. This respected institution has a reputation for suppressing archaeological evidence which may threaten the orthodox scientific stance. I should warn you. The trip is extremely arduous and requires at least six days of backpacking in some of the most challenging terrain on the planet. If you are interested in doing some exploring yourself, you might contact the "Back Country" information line (520-638-7875) at the Grand Canyon, where permits are bought for backpacking and extended hikes, both on and off trails. there are no trails to it. But will they confirm these reports? Unless it is politically correct, don’t hold your breath… CANYON’S VAST AGE - A MYTH But the point is this, If the Jordan news report is genuine, then those early Egyptian-style visitors were in a canyon whose water run-off was still copious. They were there in the first few centuries after the Flood, with the Flood-laid sediments still relatively soft – and easily erodible. So that in the few millennia since that time, the river was able to drop anything up to 2,000 feet lower, cutting down through the soft sediment. Or 800 feet lower. It doesn’t matter how much. It has not taken millions of years. Yes, we’re talking about the trapped Flood waters left behind as giant “Flood puddles” or inland lakes on the continents, and later their retreat, and the consequent drying out just a few thousand years ago. This means that the vast age of the Grand Canyon is just another myth. Believe it, the evidence is overwhelming, that there are people in high places with almost unlimited finances who are engineering a deliberate campaign to keep the truth from us. With this agenda driving them, they have seized control of the education system, the media and the entertainment industry as well. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is FACT. They have been deceiving us for too long. And if you're like me you'll want to know the truth. So now, much of the information they are so desperate to suppress, I have managed to record for you on DVD. In fact, it is one of a special 12-DVD set I have put together for you to enjoy. The result is these 12 surprise-packed DVDs: - 9 from my own special 28-night seminar series - 3 from Dr Robert Gentry’s shocking, cutting-edge revelations that are startling the scientific world. I make no apology for sharing this information. How else will you know about it? You will hold in your hands pure dynamite – powerful knowledge you can share with others! And what does it include?: 1. DEAD MEN'S SECRETS – (c.60 mins.) * Surprising Discoveries in lost cities of the dead. * China's secret pyramids. * Egypt's royal tomb shock. * Lost technology. * Ancient skeletons radioactive. * Mystery tunnels where doors snap shut behind you. * City of the dead, that no outsider saw for 1,500 years. 2. EUROPE'S COMING COLLAPSE – (c.60 mins.) * Is something really big soon to occur in Europe and the world? * Learn of the persistent prophecy that powerful men have tried to break – and WHY. * Know WHY the European Community will collapse. * This surprising prophecy begins in Iraq... and it’s a biblical prediction sealed by subsequent historical events. 3. FINGERPRINTS OF CREATION – (33 mins.) * The IMPOSSIBLE discovery in the Earth’s foundation rocks: Stunning, beautiful polonium haloes frozen into granite. * Did you know that the radioactive decay of primordial polonium can last only a few minutes? But if granites originated in a molten state and cooled over millions of years, such radioactive haloes could never have been captured – they would have decayed long before the rock solidified. * Dr Gentry’s startling scientific evidence of – hold your breath - an instant creation of the Earth!!! * Before saying no, no, no – you’d better see this! You may never think the same again. This discovery has been put to the world’s leading scientists – and they are dumbfounded. 4. HOW YOUNG IS THE EARTH? – (76 mins.) * Amazing scientific evidence that the sedimentary layers comprising the Grand Canyon were deposited quickly instead of slowly * Startling scientific data that granites, the foundation rocks of the Earth, formed rapidly instead of by slow cooling * Astonishing evidence that coal and oil can form rapidly, and did so recently * That dinosaurs lived not millions of years ago, but recently * Where does all this leave our evolution theory? * See for yourself Dr Gentry’s breathtaking bombshells 5. CENTRE OF THE UNIVERSE – THE GREAT WHITE THRONE? –(37min.) * In this suspense filled presentation Drs Robert and David Gentry reveal the amazing astronomical discovery that the universe has a nearby centre that can be identified. * Many wonder: Is the universe a cosmic accident? * Or is there a heretofore undeciphered message in the sky from the Creator Himself? * Your head will spin at this cutting edge discovery! 6. SECRETS OF THE PYRAMIDS - (c.60 mins.) * Amazing scientific discoveries about the Great Pyramid * And astonishing prophecies carried by all the major civilisations of antiquity concerning a coming Messiah. * Discover the man who wrote his own autobiography before he was born. Yes, his AUTO-biography! Impossible? You’d better see this before you dismiss it. * Have you heard of the most amazing day in history - when 40 prophecies were fulfilled in 24 hours? * Yes, I agree, this is uncanny… startling… breath-taking information. And it may even lead you to wonder: Does an unseen hand move in our affairs today? 7. UFO ALIENS: THE DEADLY SECRET – (c.60 mins.) * Are malicious entities posing as aliens from outer space? * Do these entities have an agenda? * What are UFOs - really? * Where are they from? * What about abductions? (Only one class of people on earth is exempt. Who are they?) * Did aliens really bring civilization to Planet Earth? * Who are the sinister Legion of Lucifer? * What is the occult connection? * How you can survive the plotted takeover. 8. ASTOUNDING WONDERS OF THE STARRY SKY – (c. 60 mins.) * See the “gleaming gateway to paradise” – photographic beauties of the gigantic “open space” corridor in the nebula of Orion - see undreamed of glories in the skies you will never forget. * A colossal city in space? * Is there a Heaven – if so, what and where is it? * Is there an after-life? * Will we know each other? * Will people be real, with flesh and bones? * How will you spend your time? * Information to thrill your soul... and give you hope for your future! 9. WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE DINOSAURS? - (c. 60 mins.) * Alleged sightings - fact or fake? * FRESH RED BLOOD CELLS found in dinosaur remains – what does this mean? * Also: Learn about the discovery that's toppling evolution. * Thrill to the amazing DNA code’s “sentences” and “instruction books” - identical to human language * Was there really a clever plot to use "evolution" to destroy Western society? * Learn of the scientific bombshell that is set to devastate evolution. 10. TSUNAMIS, TERRORISM, EARTHQUAKES… WHAT’S COMING? WHO’S NEXT? - (c. 60 mins.) * Archaeology confirms a most amazing event-by-event ancient prediction. * Discover prophecies 2,000 years old, that are coming to pass AT THIS MOMENT! * A million city folk die – and a small group is saved by acting on a prophecy. * AGAINST ALL ODDS - AN AMAZING ESCAPE FROM DEATH * And the prophecy continues, step by step… What is ahead, for our day? This will make your spine tingle. * Does this prophecy have apocalyptic implications? 11. SKEPTICISM BEATEN BY A PROPHECY - (c. 60 mins.) * A dead body... a torn curtain… and a rabbi's curse. * Learn about a prophecy, uncanny in its fulfilment, that religious leaders tried desperately to suppress. * Discover an event that was prophesied in the Hebrew writings to the precise year... month... day... and hour - 600 years before it happened. * Jonathan Gray’s challenge to every skeptic: disprove this astonishing prophecy if you can! 12. HOW TO TAP UNLIMITED SPIRITUAL POWER - (c. 60 mins.) * How to influence your boss... your spouse... and others around you... with this forgotten, but proven success key. * Something else: what is all this talk we hear about being born again? Can one really be born again? It sounds weird, right? But is but possible? If so, how? * “Saved” and “lost” – what on earth do these terms mean… really? Okay, let’s discover 9 ways to tell if you're one or the other. * And here are some practical tips on day-to-day living: How to unlock the key to spiritual success. So there you have it, – some very non-mainstream stuff – but backed up with a good measure of common sense and firm evidence. I guarantee you, some of the information in these 12 new DVDs will leave you amazed… breathless… and stunned! Only a limited number of people will be successful in getting this special set at a big reduction. But I shall keep the door open all this week. To claim your personal set please go to http://www.beforeus.com/dvds-12-set.html In any case, I wish you a healthy, prosperous, and enjoyable week ahead. Best regards, Jonathan Gray info@archaeologyanswers.com ------------------------------------------------------ Please tell your friends ------------------------------------------------------ Have you been enjoying the archaeology newsletters? If you know someone who would find these facts interesting, Click the URL below now to tell them, or copy and paste the URL below into your browser. http://www.beforeus.com ====================================================== If you have any questions, please email me at info@archaeologyanswers.com ====================================================== International explorer, archaeologist and author Jonathan Gray has travelled the world to gather data on ancient mysteries. He has penetrated some largely unexplored areas, including parts of the Amazon headwaters. The author has also led expeditions to the bottom of the sea and to remote mountain and desert regions of the world. He lectures internationally. ======================================================
    ASTRONOMY –
    WWW.BEFOREUS.COM
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares
  • Yuyao Linsheng Electric Co., Ltd. was established in 1995. The company is headquartered in Ningbo, China. It has always adhered to the management conviction of “scientific and technological innovation, quality first” and has built a good foundation for domestic and foreign companies – a well-known professional brand in China. We are determined not to “assembly factory”, invest heavily in modern processing equipment and advanced testing equipment to realize our own production machines and master the initiative of quality first. We have always pursued the professional development path, always adhere to the "quality first, customer first, always master high-end precision core technology, superb manufacturing technology and product quality control, with our professional services to help customers create higher value.

    Linsheng has passed ISO9001-2000 national quality management system and has a complete production management system. The main products are auto parts, electric tools, hardware, and products have been exported to Europe, America, Southeast Asia and other countries, and enjoy high reputation in the international market. Our aim is to 'survive by quality' to serve you is our goal. For customer inquiries and feedback to us, we will respond to them. We treat our customers with the most positive attitude. The answer is the most professional and reasonable offer. For new products, we will listen to our customers and provide useful advice to ensure we produce the best products.

    https://www.linsheng.com
    Yuyao Linsheng Electric Co., Ltd. was established in 1995. The company is headquartered in Ningbo, China. It has always adhered to the management conviction of “scientific and technological innovation, quality first” and has built a good foundation for domestic and foreign companies – a well-known professional brand in China. We are determined not to “assembly factory”, invest heavily in modern processing equipment and advanced testing equipment to realize our own production machines and master the initiative of quality first. We have always pursued the professional development path, always adhere to the "quality first, customer first, always master high-end precision core technology, superb manufacturing technology and product quality control, with our professional services to help customers create higher value. Linsheng has passed ISO9001-2000 national quality management system and has a complete production management system. The main products are auto parts, electric tools, hardware, and products have been exported to Europe, America, Southeast Asia and other countries, and enjoy high reputation in the international market. Our aim is to 'survive by quality' to serve you is our goal. For customer inquiries and feedback to us, we will respond to them. We treat our customers with the most positive attitude. The answer is the most professional and reasonable offer. For new products, we will listen to our customers and provide useful advice to ensure we produce the best products. https://www.linsheng.com
    Emergency Light Manufacturer | Yuyao Linsheng Electrical Company
    Linsheng Electrical Co., Ltd. is a Emergency Light Manufacturer & supplier from China, produce emergency Light,Spotlight ,Jump Start and so on.We can offer high quality products for you.
    WWW.LINSHENG.COM
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://epeak.in/2019/07/04/dunkin-threatens-franchises-sullying-the-coffee-chains-reputation-by-hiring-illegal-immigrants/
    https://epeak.in/2019/07/04/dunkin-threatens-franchises-sullying-the-coffee-chains-reputation-by-hiring-illegal-immigrants/
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • This is Michigan's rabid Democrat antisemitic, anti-America, anti-Caucasians, anti-Christians Islamic jihadist congresswoman *RASHIDA TLAIB* being arrested. I've been told Facebook has been removing these images (colluding with the Socialist Democrat Party to protect her reputation!??). This needs to be shared over and over again! 🇺🇸🦅
    This is Michigan's rabid Democrat antisemitic, anti-America, anti-Caucasians, anti-Christians Islamic jihadist congresswoman *RASHIDA TLAIB* being arrested. I've been told Facebook has been removing these images (colluding with the Socialist Democrat Party to protect her reputation!??). This needs to be shared over and over again! 🇺🇸🦅
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The Trust Project: Big Media and Silicon Valley’s Weaponized Algorithms Silence Dissent
    https://desultoryheroics.com/2019/06/18/the-trust-project-big-media-and-silicon-valleys-weaponized-algorithms-silence-dissent/
    Posted By Luther Blissett By Whitney Webb: Mintpress News 6/18/19

    After the failure of Newsguard — the news rating system backed by a cadre of prominent neoconservative personalities — to gain traction among American tech and social media companies, another organization has quietly stepped in to direct the news algorithms of tech giants such as Google, Facebook, and Microsoft.

    Though different from Newsguard, this group, known as “The Trust Project,” has a similar goal of restoring “trust” in corporate, mainstream media outlets, relative to independent alternatives, by applying “trust indicators” to social-media news algorithms in a decidedly nontransparent way.

    The funding of “The Trust Project” — coming largely from big tech companies like Google; government-connected tech oligarchs like Pierre Omidyar; and the Knight Foundation, a key Newsguard investor — suggests that an ulterior motive in its tireless promotion of “traditional” mainstream media outlets is to limit the success of dissenting alternatives.

    Of particular importance is the fact that the Trust Project’s “trust indicators” are already being used to control what news is promoted and suppressed by top search engines like Google and Bing and massive social-media networks like Facebook.

    Though the descriptions of these “trust indicators” — eight of which are currently in use — are publicly available, the way they are being used by major tech and social media companies is not.

    The Trust Project’s goal is to increase public trust in the very same traditional media outlets that Newsguard favored and to use HTML-embedded codes in favored news articles to promote their content at the expense of independent alternatives.

    Even if its effort to promote “trust” in establishment media fail, its embedded-code hidden within participating news sites allow those establishment outlets to skirt the same algorithms currently targeting their independent competition, making such issues of “trust” largely irrelevant as it moves to homogenize the online media landscape in favor of mainstream media.

    The Trust Project’s director, Sally Lehrman, made it clear that, in her view, the lack of public trust in mainstream media and its declining readership is the result of unwanted “competition by principle-free enterprises [that] further undermines its [journalism’s] very role and purpose as an engine for democracy.”

    Getting to know the Trust Project

    The Trust Project describes itself as “a consortium of top news companies” involved in developing “transparency standards that help you easily assess the quality and credibility of journalism.”

    It has done this by creating what it calls “Trust Indicators,” which the project’s website describes as “a digital standard that meets people’s needs.”

    However, far from meeting “people’s needs,” the Trust Indicators seem aimed at manipulating search engine and social-media news algorithms to the benefit of the project’s media partners, rather than to the benefit of the general public.

    The origins of the Trust Project date back to a 2012 “roundtable” hosted by the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, a center funded by former Apple CEO Mike Markkula.

    That roundtable became known as the Roundtable on Digital Journalism Ethics and was created by journalist Sally Lehrman, then working at the Markkula Center, in connection with the New Media Executive Roundtable and Online Credibility Watch of the Society of Professional Journalists.

    Lehrman has explicitly stated that the Trust Project is open only to “news organizations that adhere to traditional standards.”

    The specific idea that spurred the creation of the Trust Project itself was born at a 2014 meeting of that roundtable, when Lehrman “asked a specialist in machine learning at Twitter, and Richard Gingras, head of Google News, if algorithms could be used to support ethics instead of hurting them, and they said yes.

    Gingras agreed to collaborate.” In other words, the idea behind the Trust Project, from the start, was aimed at gaming search-engine and social-media algorithms in collusion with major tech companies like Google and Twitter.

    As the Trust Project itself notes, the means of altering algorithms were developed in tandem with tech-giant executives like Gingras and “top editors in the industry from 80 news outlets and institutions,” all of which are corporate, mainstream media outlets.

    Notably, the Trust Project’s media partners, involved in creating these new “standards” for news algorithms, include major publications owned by wealthy oligarchs: the Washington Post, owned by the world’s richest man, Jeff Bezos; the Economist, directed by the wealthy Rothschild family; and the Globe and Mail, owned by Canada’s richest family, the Thomsons, who also own Thomson Reuters.

    Other Trust Project partners include The New York Times, Mic, Hearst Television, the BBC and the USA Today network.

    Other major outlets are represented on the News Leadership Council of the Markkula Center, including the Financial Times, Gizmodo Media, and The Wall Street Journal.

    That council — which also includes Gingras and Andrew Anker, Facebook’s Director of Product Management — “guides the Trust Project on our Trust Indicators.”

    These “Trust Indicators” are the core of the Trust Project’s activities and reveal one of the key mechanisms through which Google, Twitter and Facebook have been altering their algorithms to favor outlets with good “Trust Indicator” scores.

    Trust Indicators, on their face, are aimed at making news publications “more transparent” as a means of generating increased trust with the public.

    Though a total of 37 have been developed, it appears only eight of them are currently being used.

    These eight indicators are listed and described by the Trust Project as follows:

    Best Practices: What are the news outlet’s standards? Who funds it? What is the outlet’s mission? Plus commitments to ethics, diverse voices, accuracy, making corrections and other standards.

    Author/Reporter Expertise: Who made this? Details about the journalist, including their expertise and other stories they have worked on.

    Type of Work: What is this? Labels to distinguish opinion, analysis and advertiser (or sponsored) content from news reports.

    Citations and References: What’s the source? For investigative or in-depth stories, access to the sources behind the facts and assertions.

    Methods: How was it built? Also for in-depth stories, information about why reporters chose to pursue a story and how they went about the process.

    Locally Sourced? Was the reporting done on the scene, with deep knowledge about the local situation or community? Lets you know when the story has local origin or expertise.

    Diverse Voices: What are the newsroom’s efforts and commitments to bringing in diverse perspectives? Readers noticed when certain voices, ethnicities, or political persuasions were missing.

    Actionable Feedback: Can we participate? A newsroom’s efforts to engage the public’s help in setting coverage priorities, contributing to the reporting process, ensuring accuracy and other areas. Readers want to participate and provide feedback that might alter or expand a story.

    How the Trust Project makes these indicators available to the public can be seen in its new project, the Newsroom Transparency Tracker, where it provides a table of “transparency” for participating media outlets.

    Notably, that table conflates actual transparency practices with simply providing the Trust Project with outlet policies and guidelines related to the above indicators.

    For example, The Economist gets a perfect transparency “score” for having provided the Trust Project links to its ethics policy, mission statement and other information requested by the project.

    However, the fact that those policies exist and are provided to the Trust Project does not mean that the publication’s policies are, in fact, transparent or ethical in terms of their content or in practice.

    The fact that The Economist provided links to its policies does not make the publication more transparent, but — in the context of the Newsroom Transparency Tracker’s table — it provides the appearance of transparency, though such policy disclosures by The Economist are unlikely to translate into any changes to its well-known biases and slanted reporting towards certain issues.

    Trust Indicators manipulate big tech algorithms

    The true power of the Trust Indicators comes in a form that is not visible to the general public.

    These Trust Indicators, while occasionally displayed on partner websites, are also coupled with “machine-readable signals” embedded in the HTML code of participating websites and articles used by Facebook, Google, Bing and Twitter.

    As Lehrman noted in a 2017 article, the Trust Project was then “already working with these four companies, all of which have said they want to use our indicators to prioritize honest, well-reported news over fakery and falsehood.”

    Gingras of Google News also noted that the Trust Indicators are used by Google as “cues to help search engines better understand and rank results … [and] to help the myriad algorithmic systems that mold our media lives.”

    A press release from the Trust Project last year further underscores the importance of the embedded “indicators” to alter social-media and search-engine algorithms:

    While each Indicator is visible to users on the pages of the Project’s news partners, it is also embedded in the article and site code for machines to read — providing the first, standardized technical language that offers contextual information about news sites’ commitments to transparency.”

    Despite claiming to increase public knowledge of “news sites’ commitments to transparency,” the way that major tech companies like Google and Facebook are using these indicators is anything but transparent.

    Indeed, it is largely unknown how these indicators are used, though there are a few clues.

    For instance, CBS News cited Craig Newmark — the billionaire founder of Craigslist, who provided the Trust Project’s seed funding — as suggesting that “Google’s search algorithm could rank trusted sources above others in search results” by using the project’s Trust Indicators.

    Last year, the Trust Project stated that Bing used “the ‘Type of Work’ Trust Indicator to display whether an article is news, opinion or analysis.”

    It also stated that “when Facebook launched its process to index news Pages, they worked with the Trust Project to make it easy for any publisher to add optional information about their Page.”

    In Google’s case, Gingras was quoted as saying that Google News uses the indicators “to assess the relative authoritativeness of news organizations and authors. We’re looking forward to developing new ways to use the indicators.”

    Notably, the machine-readable version of these Trust Indicators is available only to participating institutions, which are currently corporate, mainstream publications.

    Though WordPress and Drupal plug-ins are being developed to make those embedded signals to search engines and social media available to smaller publishers, it will be made available only to “qualified publishers,” a determination that will presumably be made by the Trust Project and its associates.

    Richard Gingras, in a statement made in 2017, noted that “the indicators can help our algorithms better understand authoritative journalism — and help us to better surface it to consumers.”

    Thus, it is abundantly clear that these indicators, which are embedded only into “qualified” and “authoritative” news websites, will be used to slant search-engine and social-media news algorithms in favor of establishment news websites.

    The bottom line is that these embedded and exclusive indicators allow certain news outlets to avoid the crushing effects of recent algorithm changes that have seen traffic to many news websites, including MintPress, plummet in recent years.

    This is leading towards a homogenization of the online news landscape by starving independent competitors of web traffic while Trust Project-approved outlets are given an escape valve through algorithm manipulation.

    The tech billionaires behind the Trust Project

    Given the Trust Project’s rich-get-richer impact on the online news landscape, it is not surprising to find that it is funded by rich and powerful figures and forces with a clear stake in controlling the flow of news and information online.

    According to its website, the Trust Project currently receives funding from Craig Newmark Philanthropies, Google, Facebook, eBay founder Pierre Omidyar’s Democracy Fund, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation (often abbreviated as the Knight Foundation), and the Markkula Foundation.

    Its website also states that Google was “an early financial supporter” and that it had originally been funded by Craig Newmark, the founder of Craigslist.

    As previously mentioned, the Trust Project’s co-founder is Richard Gingras, current Google vice president of News.

    The Trust Project’s website described Gingras’s current role with the organization as “a powerful evangelist” who “can always be counted upon for expert advice and encouragement.”

    Newmark’s current role at the Trust Project is described as that of a “funder and valued connector.”

    Newmark, through Craig Newmark Philanthropies, who provided the initial funding for the Trust Project, and has also funded other related initiatives like the News Integrity Initiative at the City University of New York, which shares many of the same financiers as the Trust Project, including Facebook, Omidyar’s Democracy Fund, and the Knight Foundation.

    The Trust Project is listed as a collaborator of the News Integrity Initiative. Newmark is also very active in several news-related NGOs with similar overlap. For instance, he sits on the board of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a longtime recipient of massive grants from the Omidyar Network, and Politifact[dot]com, which is funded in part by Omidyar’s Democracy Fund.

    Newmark is currently working with Vivian Schiller as his “strategic adviser” in his media investments.

    Schiller is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, former head of news at Twitter, and a veteran of well-known mainstream outlets like NPR, CNN, The New York Times and NBC News. She is also a director of the Scott Trust, which owns The Guardian.

    The Markkula Foundation, one of the key funders of the Trust Project, exercises considerable influence over the organization through the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, which originally incubated the organization and whose News Leadership Council plays an important role at the Trust Project.

    That council’s membership includes representatives of Facebook, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Financial Times and Google, and “guides the Trust Project on our Trust Indicators and advises on core issues related to information literacy and rebuilding trust in journalism within a fractious, so-called post-fact environment.”

    Both the Markkula Foundation and the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics were founded by A. M. “Mike” Markkula, former CEO of Apple.

    The Markkula Center’s Journalism Ethics program is currently headed by Subramaniam Vincent, a former software engineer and consultant for Intel and Cisco Systems who has worked to bring together big data with local journalism and is an advocate for the use of “ethical-AI [artificial intelligence] to ingest, sort, and classify news.”

    The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation is another interesting funder of the Trust Project, given that this same foundation is also a key investor in Newsguard, the controversial, biased news rating system with deep connections to government insiders and self-described government propagandists.

    There is considerable overlap between Newsguard and the Trust Project, with the latter citing Newsguard as a partner and also stating that Newsguard’s demonstrably biased ratings use the project’s “trust indicators” in its full-length reviews of news websites, which Newsguard calls “nutrition labels.”

    In addition, becoming a Trust Project participant is a factor that “supports a positive evaluation” from Newsguard, according to a press release from last year.

    Notably, Sally Lehrman, who leads the Trust Project, described the project’s trust indicators for news as ”along the lines of a nutrition label on a package of food” when the Trust Project was created nearly a year before Newsguard launched, suggesting some intellectual overlap.

    A previous MintPress exposé revealed Newsguard’s numerous conflicts of interest and a ratings system strongly biased in favor of well-known, traditional media outlets — even when those outlets have a dubious track record of promoting so-called “fake news.”

    It should come as no surprise that the Trust Project’s goal is to increase public trust in the very same traditional media outlets that Newsguard favored and to use HTML-embedded codes in news articles to promote their content at the expense of independent alternatives.

    A familiar face in the war against independent media

    The Democracy Fund, another top funder of the Trust Project and a bipartisan foundation that was established by eBay founder and PayPal owner Omidyar in 2011 “out of deep respect for the U.S. Constitution and our nation’s core democratic values.”

    It is a spin-off of the Omidyar Network and, after splitting off as an independent company in 2014, became a member of the Omidyar Group.

    The fund’s National Advisory Committee includes former Bush and Obama administration officials and representatives of Facebook, Microsoft, NBC News, ABC News and Gizmodo Media group.

    The Democracy Fund’s involvement in the Trust Project is notable because of the other media projects it funds, such as the new media empire of arch-neoconservative Bill Kristol, who has a long history of creating and disseminating falsehoods that have been used to justify the U.S. war in Iraq and other hawkish foreign policy stances.

    As a recent MintPress series revealed, Omidyar’s Democracy Fund provides financial support to Kristol’s Defending Democracy Together initiative and also supports Kristol’s Alliance for Securing Democracy, a project of the German Marshall Fund think tank that is best known for its cryptic Hamilton68 “Russian bot” dashboard.

    Omidyar’s Democracy Fund has also donated to the German Marshall Fund’s Defending Digital Democracy project and directly to the German Marshall Fund itself. In addition, Charles Sykes, a co-founder and editor-at-large of Kristol’s new publication The Bulwark, is on the Democracy Fund’s National Advisory Committee.

    An acolyte of Kristol’s who works at the German Marshall Fund, Jamie Fly, stated last October that the coordinated social-media purges of independent media pages known for their criticisms of U.S. empire and U.S. police violence was “just the beginning” and hinted that the German Marshall Fund had a hand in past social media purges and, presumably, a role in future purges.

    Thus, the Democracy Fund’s links to neoconservatives who promote the censoring of independent media sites that are critical of militaristic U.S. foreign policy jibe with the fund’s underlying interest in the Trust Project.

    Omidyar’s involvement with the Trust Project is interesting for another reason, namely that Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the controversial Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to become a key driver of which outlets are censored by Silicon Valley tech giants.

    The ADL was initially founded to “stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all” but critics say that over the years it has begun labeling critics of Israel’s government as “anti-Semites.”

    For example, content that characterizes Israeli policies towards Palestinians as “racist” or “apartheid-like” is considered “hate speech” by the ADL, as is accusing Israel of war crimes or attempted ethnic cleansing.

    The ADL has even described explicitly Jewish organizations that are critical of Israel’s government as being “anti-Semitic.”

    In March 2017, the Omidyar Network provided the “critical seed capital” need to launch the ADL’s “new Silicon Valley center aimed at tackling this rising wave of intolerance and to collaborate more closely with technology companies to promote democracy and social justice.”

    That Omidyar-funded ADL center allowed the ADL to team up with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft — all of whom also collaborate with the Trust Project — to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab. Since then, these companies and their subsidiaries, including Google’s YouTube, have relied on the ADL to flag “controversial” content.

    Given the fact that the Trust Project shares with the ADL a key funder (Pierre Omidyar) and several external tech partners, it remains to be seen whether there is overlap between how major tech companies like Google and Facebook use the Trust Indicators in its algorithms and the influence of the ADL on those very same algorithms.

    What is clear however is that there exists an undeniable overlap given the fact that Craig Newmark, who provided the seed funding for the Trust Project and continues to fund it, is also a key donor and advisor to the ADL.

    In 2017, Newmark gave $100,000 to the ADL’s Incident Response Center and is a member of the group’s tech advisory board.

    Outsourcing censorship

    Of course, the most interesting and troubling donors of the Trust Project are Google and Facebook, both of which are using the very project they fund as a “third party” to justify their manipulation of newsfeed and search-engine algorithms.

    Google’s intimate involvement from the very inception of the Trust Project tags it as an extension of Google that has since been marketed as an “independent” organization tasked with justifying algorithm changes that favor certain news outlets over others.

    Facebook, similarly, funds the Trust Project and also employs the “trust indicators” it funds to alter its newsfeed algorithm.

    Facebook’s other partners in altering this algorithm include the Atlantic Council — funded by the U.S. government, NATO, and weapons manufacturers, among others — and Facebook has also directly teamed up with foreign governments, such as the government of Israel, to suppress accurate yet dissenting information that the government in question wanted removed from the social-media platform.

    The murkiness between “private” censorship, censorship by tech oligarchs, and censorship by government is particularly marked in the Trust Project.

    The private financiers of the Trust Project that also use its product to promote certain news content over others — namely Google and Facebook — have ties to the U.S. government, with Google being a government contractor and Facebook sporting a growing body of former-government officials in top company positions, including a co-author of the controversial Patriot Act as the company’s general counsel.

    A similar tangle surrounds Pierre Omidyar, funder of the Trust Project through the Democracy Fund, who is extremely well-connected to the U.S. government, especially the military-industrial complex and intelligence communities.

    And partnering with media outlets like the Washington Post, whose owner is Jeff Bezos, spawns more conflicts of interests, given that Bezos’ company, Amazon, is also a major U.S. government contractor.

    This growing nexus binding Silicon Valley companies and oligarchs, mainstream media outlets and the government suggests that these entities have increasingly similar and complementary interests, among which is the censorship of independent watchdog journalists and news outlets that seek to challenge their power and narratives.

    The Trust Project was created as a way of outsourcing censorship of independent news sites while attempting to salvage the tattered reputation of mainstream media outlets and return the U.S. and international media landscape to years past when such outlets were able to dominate the narrative.

    While it seems unlikely that’s its initiatives will succeed in restoring trust to mainstream media given the many recent and continuing examples of those same “traditional” media outlets circulating fake news and failing to cover crucial aspects of events, the Trust Project’s development of hidden algorithm-altering codes in participating websites shows that its real goal is not about improving public trust but about providing a facade of independence to Silicon Valley censorship of independent media outlets that speak truth to power.
    The Trust Project: Big Media and Silicon Valley’s Weaponized Algorithms Silence Dissent https://desultoryheroics.com/2019/06/18/the-trust-project-big-media-and-silicon-valleys-weaponized-algorithms-silence-dissent/ Posted By Luther Blissett By Whitney Webb: Mintpress News 6/18/19 After the failure of Newsguard — the news rating system backed by a cadre of prominent neoconservative personalities — to gain traction among American tech and social media companies, another organization has quietly stepped in to direct the news algorithms of tech giants such as Google, Facebook, and Microsoft. Though different from Newsguard, this group, known as “The Trust Project,” has a similar goal of restoring “trust” in corporate, mainstream media outlets, relative to independent alternatives, by applying “trust indicators” to social-media news algorithms in a decidedly nontransparent way. The funding of “The Trust Project” — coming largely from big tech companies like Google; government-connected tech oligarchs like Pierre Omidyar; and the Knight Foundation, a key Newsguard investor — suggests that an ulterior motive in its tireless promotion of “traditional” mainstream media outlets is to limit the success of dissenting alternatives. Of particular importance is the fact that the Trust Project’s “trust indicators” are already being used to control what news is promoted and suppressed by top search engines like Google and Bing and massive social-media networks like Facebook. Though the descriptions of these “trust indicators” — eight of which are currently in use — are publicly available, the way they are being used by major tech and social media companies is not. The Trust Project’s goal is to increase public trust in the very same traditional media outlets that Newsguard favored and to use HTML-embedded codes in favored news articles to promote their content at the expense of independent alternatives. Even if its effort to promote “trust” in establishment media fail, its embedded-code hidden within participating news sites allow those establishment outlets to skirt the same algorithms currently targeting their independent competition, making such issues of “trust” largely irrelevant as it moves to homogenize the online media landscape in favor of mainstream media. The Trust Project’s director, Sally Lehrman, made it clear that, in her view, the lack of public trust in mainstream media and its declining readership is the result of unwanted “competition by principle-free enterprises [that] further undermines its [journalism’s] very role and purpose as an engine for democracy.” Getting to know the Trust Project The Trust Project describes itself as “a consortium of top news companies” involved in developing “transparency standards that help you easily assess the quality and credibility of journalism.” It has done this by creating what it calls “Trust Indicators,” which the project’s website describes as “a digital standard that meets people’s needs.” However, far from meeting “people’s needs,” the Trust Indicators seem aimed at manipulating search engine and social-media news algorithms to the benefit of the project’s media partners, rather than to the benefit of the general public. The origins of the Trust Project date back to a 2012 “roundtable” hosted by the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, a center funded by former Apple CEO Mike Markkula. That roundtable became known as the Roundtable on Digital Journalism Ethics and was created by journalist Sally Lehrman, then working at the Markkula Center, in connection with the New Media Executive Roundtable and Online Credibility Watch of the Society of Professional Journalists. Lehrman has explicitly stated that the Trust Project is open only to “news organizations that adhere to traditional standards.” The specific idea that spurred the creation of the Trust Project itself was born at a 2014 meeting of that roundtable, when Lehrman “asked a specialist in machine learning at Twitter, and Richard Gingras, head of Google News, if algorithms could be used to support ethics instead of hurting them, and they said yes. Gingras agreed to collaborate.” In other words, the idea behind the Trust Project, from the start, was aimed at gaming search-engine and social-media algorithms in collusion with major tech companies like Google and Twitter. As the Trust Project itself notes, the means of altering algorithms were developed in tandem with tech-giant executives like Gingras and “top editors in the industry from 80 news outlets and institutions,” all of which are corporate, mainstream media outlets. Notably, the Trust Project’s media partners, involved in creating these new “standards” for news algorithms, include major publications owned by wealthy oligarchs: the Washington Post, owned by the world’s richest man, Jeff Bezos; the Economist, directed by the wealthy Rothschild family; and the Globe and Mail, owned by Canada’s richest family, the Thomsons, who also own Thomson Reuters. Other Trust Project partners include The New York Times, Mic, Hearst Television, the BBC and the USA Today network. Other major outlets are represented on the News Leadership Council of the Markkula Center, including the Financial Times, Gizmodo Media, and The Wall Street Journal. That council — which also includes Gingras and Andrew Anker, Facebook’s Director of Product Management — “guides the Trust Project on our Trust Indicators.” These “Trust Indicators” are the core of the Trust Project’s activities and reveal one of the key mechanisms through which Google, Twitter and Facebook have been altering their algorithms to favor outlets with good “Trust Indicator” scores. Trust Indicators, on their face, are aimed at making news publications “more transparent” as a means of generating increased trust with the public. Though a total of 37 have been developed, it appears only eight of them are currently being used. These eight indicators are listed and described by the Trust Project as follows: Best Practices: What are the news outlet’s standards? Who funds it? What is the outlet’s mission? Plus commitments to ethics, diverse voices, accuracy, making corrections and other standards. Author/Reporter Expertise: Who made this? Details about the journalist, including their expertise and other stories they have worked on. Type of Work: What is this? Labels to distinguish opinion, analysis and advertiser (or sponsored) content from news reports. Citations and References: What’s the source? For investigative or in-depth stories, access to the sources behind the facts and assertions. Methods: How was it built? Also for in-depth stories, information about why reporters chose to pursue a story and how they went about the process. Locally Sourced? Was the reporting done on the scene, with deep knowledge about the local situation or community? Lets you know when the story has local origin or expertise. Diverse Voices: What are the newsroom’s efforts and commitments to bringing in diverse perspectives? Readers noticed when certain voices, ethnicities, or political persuasions were missing. Actionable Feedback: Can we participate? A newsroom’s efforts to engage the public’s help in setting coverage priorities, contributing to the reporting process, ensuring accuracy and other areas. Readers want to participate and provide feedback that might alter or expand a story. How the Trust Project makes these indicators available to the public can be seen in its new project, the Newsroom Transparency Tracker, where it provides a table of “transparency” for participating media outlets. Notably, that table conflates actual transparency practices with simply providing the Trust Project with outlet policies and guidelines related to the above indicators. For example, The Economist gets a perfect transparency “score” for having provided the Trust Project links to its ethics policy, mission statement and other information requested by the project. However, the fact that those policies exist and are provided to the Trust Project does not mean that the publication’s policies are, in fact, transparent or ethical in terms of their content or in practice. The fact that The Economist provided links to its policies does not make the publication more transparent, but — in the context of the Newsroom Transparency Tracker’s table — it provides the appearance of transparency, though such policy disclosures by The Economist are unlikely to translate into any changes to its well-known biases and slanted reporting towards certain issues. Trust Indicators manipulate big tech algorithms The true power of the Trust Indicators comes in a form that is not visible to the general public. These Trust Indicators, while occasionally displayed on partner websites, are also coupled with “machine-readable signals” embedded in the HTML code of participating websites and articles used by Facebook, Google, Bing and Twitter. As Lehrman noted in a 2017 article, the Trust Project was then “already working with these four companies, all of which have said they want to use our indicators to prioritize honest, well-reported news over fakery and falsehood.” Gingras of Google News also noted that the Trust Indicators are used by Google as “cues to help search engines better understand and rank results … [and] to help the myriad algorithmic systems that mold our media lives.” A press release from the Trust Project last year further underscores the importance of the embedded “indicators” to alter social-media and search-engine algorithms: While each Indicator is visible to users on the pages of the Project’s news partners, it is also embedded in the article and site code for machines to read — providing the first, standardized technical language that offers contextual information about news sites’ commitments to transparency.” Despite claiming to increase public knowledge of “news sites’ commitments to transparency,” the way that major tech companies like Google and Facebook are using these indicators is anything but transparent. Indeed, it is largely unknown how these indicators are used, though there are a few clues. For instance, CBS News cited Craig Newmark — the billionaire founder of Craigslist, who provided the Trust Project’s seed funding — as suggesting that “Google’s search algorithm could rank trusted sources above others in search results” by using the project’s Trust Indicators. Last year, the Trust Project stated that Bing used “the ‘Type of Work’ Trust Indicator to display whether an article is news, opinion or analysis.” It also stated that “when Facebook launched its process to index news Pages, they worked with the Trust Project to make it easy for any publisher to add optional information about their Page.” In Google’s case, Gingras was quoted as saying that Google News uses the indicators “to assess the relative authoritativeness of news organizations and authors. We’re looking forward to developing new ways to use the indicators.” Notably, the machine-readable version of these Trust Indicators is available only to participating institutions, which are currently corporate, mainstream publications. Though WordPress and Drupal plug-ins are being developed to make those embedded signals to search engines and social media available to smaller publishers, it will be made available only to “qualified publishers,” a determination that will presumably be made by the Trust Project and its associates. Richard Gingras, in a statement made in 2017, noted that “the indicators can help our algorithms better understand authoritative journalism — and help us to better surface it to consumers.” Thus, it is abundantly clear that these indicators, which are embedded only into “qualified” and “authoritative” news websites, will be used to slant search-engine and social-media news algorithms in favor of establishment news websites. The bottom line is that these embedded and exclusive indicators allow certain news outlets to avoid the crushing effects of recent algorithm changes that have seen traffic to many news websites, including MintPress, plummet in recent years. This is leading towards a homogenization of the online news landscape by starving independent competitors of web traffic while Trust Project-approved outlets are given an escape valve through algorithm manipulation. The tech billionaires behind the Trust Project Given the Trust Project’s rich-get-richer impact on the online news landscape, it is not surprising to find that it is funded by rich and powerful figures and forces with a clear stake in controlling the flow of news and information online. According to its website, the Trust Project currently receives funding from Craig Newmark Philanthropies, Google, Facebook, eBay founder Pierre Omidyar’s Democracy Fund, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation (often abbreviated as the Knight Foundation), and the Markkula Foundation. Its website also states that Google was “an early financial supporter” and that it had originally been funded by Craig Newmark, the founder of Craigslist. As previously mentioned, the Trust Project’s co-founder is Richard Gingras, current Google vice president of News. The Trust Project’s website described Gingras’s current role with the organization as “a powerful evangelist” who “can always be counted upon for expert advice and encouragement.” Newmark’s current role at the Trust Project is described as that of a “funder and valued connector.” Newmark, through Craig Newmark Philanthropies, who provided the initial funding for the Trust Project, and has also funded other related initiatives like the News Integrity Initiative at the City University of New York, which shares many of the same financiers as the Trust Project, including Facebook, Omidyar’s Democracy Fund, and the Knight Foundation. The Trust Project is listed as a collaborator of the News Integrity Initiative. Newmark is also very active in several news-related NGOs with similar overlap. For instance, he sits on the board of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a longtime recipient of massive grants from the Omidyar Network, and Politifact[dot]com, which is funded in part by Omidyar’s Democracy Fund. Newmark is currently working with Vivian Schiller as his “strategic adviser” in his media investments. Schiller is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, former head of news at Twitter, and a veteran of well-known mainstream outlets like NPR, CNN, The New York Times and NBC News. She is also a director of the Scott Trust, which owns The Guardian. The Markkula Foundation, one of the key funders of the Trust Project, exercises considerable influence over the organization through the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, which originally incubated the organization and whose News Leadership Council plays an important role at the Trust Project. That council’s membership includes representatives of Facebook, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Financial Times and Google, and “guides the Trust Project on our Trust Indicators and advises on core issues related to information literacy and rebuilding trust in journalism within a fractious, so-called post-fact environment.” Both the Markkula Foundation and the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics were founded by A. M. “Mike” Markkula, former CEO of Apple. The Markkula Center’s Journalism Ethics program is currently headed by Subramaniam Vincent, a former software engineer and consultant for Intel and Cisco Systems who has worked to bring together big data with local journalism and is an advocate for the use of “ethical-AI [artificial intelligence] to ingest, sort, and classify news.” The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation is another interesting funder of the Trust Project, given that this same foundation is also a key investor in Newsguard, the controversial, biased news rating system with deep connections to government insiders and self-described government propagandists. There is considerable overlap between Newsguard and the Trust Project, with the latter citing Newsguard as a partner and also stating that Newsguard’s demonstrably biased ratings use the project’s “trust indicators” in its full-length reviews of news websites, which Newsguard calls “nutrition labels.” In addition, becoming a Trust Project participant is a factor that “supports a positive evaluation” from Newsguard, according to a press release from last year. Notably, Sally Lehrman, who leads the Trust Project, described the project’s trust indicators for news as ”along the lines of a nutrition label on a package of food” when the Trust Project was created nearly a year before Newsguard launched, suggesting some intellectual overlap. A previous MintPress exposé revealed Newsguard’s numerous conflicts of interest and a ratings system strongly biased in favor of well-known, traditional media outlets — even when those outlets have a dubious track record of promoting so-called “fake news.” It should come as no surprise that the Trust Project’s goal is to increase public trust in the very same traditional media outlets that Newsguard favored and to use HTML-embedded codes in news articles to promote their content at the expense of independent alternatives. A familiar face in the war against independent media The Democracy Fund, another top funder of the Trust Project and a bipartisan foundation that was established by eBay founder and PayPal owner Omidyar in 2011 “out of deep respect for the U.S. Constitution and our nation’s core democratic values.” It is a spin-off of the Omidyar Network and, after splitting off as an independent company in 2014, became a member of the Omidyar Group. The fund’s National Advisory Committee includes former Bush and Obama administration officials and representatives of Facebook, Microsoft, NBC News, ABC News and Gizmodo Media group. The Democracy Fund’s involvement in the Trust Project is notable because of the other media projects it funds, such as the new media empire of arch-neoconservative Bill Kristol, who has a long history of creating and disseminating falsehoods that have been used to justify the U.S. war in Iraq and other hawkish foreign policy stances. As a recent MintPress series revealed, Omidyar’s Democracy Fund provides financial support to Kristol’s Defending Democracy Together initiative and also supports Kristol’s Alliance for Securing Democracy, a project of the German Marshall Fund think tank that is best known for its cryptic Hamilton68 “Russian bot” dashboard. Omidyar’s Democracy Fund has also donated to the German Marshall Fund’s Defending Digital Democracy project and directly to the German Marshall Fund itself. In addition, Charles Sykes, a co-founder and editor-at-large of Kristol’s new publication The Bulwark, is on the Democracy Fund’s National Advisory Committee. An acolyte of Kristol’s who works at the German Marshall Fund, Jamie Fly, stated last October that the coordinated social-media purges of independent media pages known for their criticisms of U.S. empire and U.S. police violence was “just the beginning” and hinted that the German Marshall Fund had a hand in past social media purges and, presumably, a role in future purges. Thus, the Democracy Fund’s links to neoconservatives who promote the censoring of independent media sites that are critical of militaristic U.S. foreign policy jibe with the fund’s underlying interest in the Trust Project. Omidyar’s involvement with the Trust Project is interesting for another reason, namely that Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the controversial Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to become a key driver of which outlets are censored by Silicon Valley tech giants. The ADL was initially founded to “stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all” but critics say that over the years it has begun labeling critics of Israel’s government as “anti-Semites.” For example, content that characterizes Israeli policies towards Palestinians as “racist” or “apartheid-like” is considered “hate speech” by the ADL, as is accusing Israel of war crimes or attempted ethnic cleansing. The ADL has even described explicitly Jewish organizations that are critical of Israel’s government as being “anti-Semitic.” In March 2017, the Omidyar Network provided the “critical seed capital” need to launch the ADL’s “new Silicon Valley center aimed at tackling this rising wave of intolerance and to collaborate more closely with technology companies to promote democracy and social justice.” That Omidyar-funded ADL center allowed the ADL to team up with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft — all of whom also collaborate with the Trust Project — to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab. Since then, these companies and their subsidiaries, including Google’s YouTube, have relied on the ADL to flag “controversial” content. Given the fact that the Trust Project shares with the ADL a key funder (Pierre Omidyar) and several external tech partners, it remains to be seen whether there is overlap between how major tech companies like Google and Facebook use the Trust Indicators in its algorithms and the influence of the ADL on those very same algorithms. What is clear however is that there exists an undeniable overlap given the fact that Craig Newmark, who provided the seed funding for the Trust Project and continues to fund it, is also a key donor and advisor to the ADL. In 2017, Newmark gave $100,000 to the ADL’s Incident Response Center and is a member of the group’s tech advisory board. Outsourcing censorship Of course, the most interesting and troubling donors of the Trust Project are Google and Facebook, both of which are using the very project they fund as a “third party” to justify their manipulation of newsfeed and search-engine algorithms. Google’s intimate involvement from the very inception of the Trust Project tags it as an extension of Google that has since been marketed as an “independent” organization tasked with justifying algorithm changes that favor certain news outlets over others. Facebook, similarly, funds the Trust Project and also employs the “trust indicators” it funds to alter its newsfeed algorithm. Facebook’s other partners in altering this algorithm include the Atlantic Council — funded by the U.S. government, NATO, and weapons manufacturers, among others — and Facebook has also directly teamed up with foreign governments, such as the government of Israel, to suppress accurate yet dissenting information that the government in question wanted removed from the social-media platform. The murkiness between “private” censorship, censorship by tech oligarchs, and censorship by government is particularly marked in the Trust Project. The private financiers of the Trust Project that also use its product to promote certain news content over others — namely Google and Facebook — have ties to the U.S. government, with Google being a government contractor and Facebook sporting a growing body of former-government officials in top company positions, including a co-author of the controversial Patriot Act as the company’s general counsel. A similar tangle surrounds Pierre Omidyar, funder of the Trust Project through the Democracy Fund, who is extremely well-connected to the U.S. government, especially the military-industrial complex and intelligence communities. And partnering with media outlets like the Washington Post, whose owner is Jeff Bezos, spawns more conflicts of interests, given that Bezos’ company, Amazon, is also a major U.S. government contractor. This growing nexus binding Silicon Valley companies and oligarchs, mainstream media outlets and the government suggests that these entities have increasingly similar and complementary interests, among which is the censorship of independent watchdog journalists and news outlets that seek to challenge their power and narratives. The Trust Project was created as a way of outsourcing censorship of independent news sites while attempting to salvage the tattered reputation of mainstream media outlets and return the U.S. and international media landscape to years past when such outlets were able to dominate the narrative. While it seems unlikely that’s its initiatives will succeed in restoring trust to mainstream media given the many recent and continuing examples of those same “traditional” media outlets circulating fake news and failing to cover crucial aspects of events, the Trust Project’s development of hidden algorithm-altering codes in participating websites shows that its real goal is not about improving public trust but about providing a facade of independence to Silicon Valley censorship of independent media outlets that speak truth to power.
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares

No results to show

No results to show

No results to show

No results to show