• http://technocracy.studio/e/california-officially-slips-into-3rd-world-status/
    http://technocracy.studio/e/california-officially-slips-into-3rd-world-status/
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://www.lewrockwell.com/political-theatre/slipping-into-madness-the-comparisons-to-the-1920s-and-1930s-are-just-uncanny/
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/political-theatre/slipping-into-madness-the-comparisons-to-the-1920s-and-1930s-are-just-uncanny/
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • #Fashion ROCKSTAR STUDDED ANKLE JEAN
    Layers of mixed metal studs rock out the front pockets and zip cuffs on this easy stretch ankle jean. Slip on your favorite heels and comfortable tee for the perfect night-out look.

    https://bit.ly/2otckPi
    Disclosure: Sometimes we get paid if you click one of those links and purchase a product or service
    #Fashion ROCKSTAR STUDDED ANKLE JEAN Layers of mixed metal studs rock out the front pockets and zip cuffs on this easy stretch ankle jean. Slip on your favorite heels and comfortable tee for the perfect night-out look. https://bit.ly/2otckPi Disclosure: Sometimes we get paid if you click one of those links and purchase a product or service
    Rockstar Studded Ankle Jean
    Layers of mixed metal studs rock out the front pockets and zip cuffs on this easy stretch ankle jean. Slip on your favorite heels and comfortable tee for the perfect night-ou
    BIT.LY
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Actions
    GERMANY REPORT

    EATING NRW DEN
    22.9. 2019

    TIME 6 PM 30 MIN

    GERMANY
    EATING NRW STEEL
    BERGMANN field "
    SMALL ISTANBUL "START OF NO GO ZONE
    REPORT 22.09.2019
    LIVING AFTER FUSE! OK!
    to 1) (TRUTH OR NOT TRUTH CONDITION BY TRANCE OF THE ILLUMINATI THE FREEMASON SATANIST SECRET ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY
    INFLUENCE OF YESTERDAY I WILL NOW LIKE I WILL BE DEALED AND HOW IN THE BORDERS INFORMATION OR DECISIONS I NEVER HAD TAKEN OUT OF ME YOU WILL USE GAS FOR IT I COULD SEE THE BOTTLE AND PEOPLE WITH GAS MASKS THE PERVERSE JEWS TRAIL GOING ON THE WORLD SHOULD GO FROM THE COUNTRY MILLIONS JEWS DO NOT BRING ANYTHING TO PERVERS SO THAT WAS SO YESTERIOR WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE NIGHT THEN THE ROTHSHILD PAY A COMPENSATION TO ME HE SHOULD PRELTE THAT THAT WOULD BE VERY HIGH AND FEELED OUT OF THE CUTTER AND WITH MONEY I CAN ALL FACE TALKED TO I DISCLAIMED THE DEFAMINATION AND SAID WITH MONEY CAN NOT BUY ANYTHING MULTIPLE PRESENTER WAS FINALLY TOLD I HAVE WAITED IT FOR YEARS ANOTHER MAN SAID WHAT YOU HAVE NOT HAVE CHARACTER IN THE END FACT THERE WAS STILL A TIME WITH DAMAGES OF DIFFERENT DOUBLE DEALERS I SOAKED OFF BECAUSE THE BRAIN FREQUENCIES USED THE US MILITARY MI T HE UNDERSTANDING YOU CAN BECOME A WHITE STILL A BLACK MERCEDES WITH JEWS PROMINENCE WAS PREVENTED BY TWO PANZARS ON A FRONT OF A REAL CENTRAL FLIGHT AT ASTRAL LEVEL HAS PREVENTED THE SOLE JUMPING OF PROFESSIONALS IF THE JUST USED BODY WAS DESTROYED BY ME UNKNOWN BEING THE TO FLOAT RAILS PLAY EVERYTHING LITTLE COMMON IS BUT SO EXPERIENCED THE WHOLE FUND IN TURNING HAMMER OF 100 METERS REMOVED PRIMARY SCHOOL INSTEAD OF SO NOW TO TODAY I HAD SERIOUS PAINTERS EVERY NIGHT AND IN THE NIGHT I WAS WHILE I SLIPPED AT MY CAPS ARM TURNED AND MY BODY THUS BREAKS THE HE MY GARMENTS ON BONES ON BONES LAG UNDER USE OF DEVICES GAS THE JUDE AGAIN AGAIN MY PAIN DEATHED BUT PATIENCE I ALSO STILL HURT TO YOUR PAIN AND THE ETERNAL AGAINST LUNCH I AM TO TANK TOBACCO SHOPPING EVERYWHERE ROTHSCHILD MARIONETTES AND I THINK CONSTITUTION PROTECTION THAT THE PENTAGO N ME AS THE HEAD OF THE DEEP STATE INSTEADED AS PRELL BOCK SO HAS A ROTHSCHILD ASS WITH GOLD GLASSES ONE OF THE PERVERSES THAT I KNOW WITH STEEL WEAPON IN THE BUSHET THAT CAN ONLY PERVERSE SATANISTS OFF AND WILL ALSO COME AWAY MY BODY CONDITION IS NOT A CHESTASTROPHAL I GET BOMBING AND JUMPING PAIN FOR LUCK I AM NOT LUBRICATED ON THE MOVE I CAN NOT EAT ANY MORE AND ME IS PERFECTLY EVIL
    ON THE BATTLE TO THE NICE CROSS PATRIOTS
    UNTIL TOMORROW SO GOD WANTS AND GRACE HAS

    Aktionen
    DEUTSCHLAND BERICHT

    ESSEN NRW DEN
    22.09. 2019

    ZEIT 18 UHR 30 MIN

    DEUTSCHLAND
    ESSEN NRW STAHL
    BERGMANN Feld "
    KLEINE ISTANBUL" ANFANG EINER NO GO ZONE
    BERICHT 22.09.2019
    lebendige NACH SICHERUNG! OK!
    zu 1) (WAHRHEIT ODER NICHT WAHRHEITSBEDINGUNG DURCH TRANCE DER ILLUMINATI DER FREIMAURER-SATANISTEN-SECRET-ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY
    BEEINFLUSSUNG VON GESTERN ICH WEIẞ JETZT WIE ICH BETÄBT WERDE UND WIE IM GRENZBEREICH INFORMATIONEN ODER ENTSCHEIDUNGEN DIE ICH NIE GETROFFEN HÄTTE AUS MIR RAUSGEHOLT WERDEN SIE BENUTZEN GAS DAFÜR ICH KONNTE DIE FLASCHE SEHEN UND PERSONEN MIT GAS MASKEN DER PERVERSE JUDEN TRAIL GEHT WEITER DIE WELT SOLLTE SICH VON DEN PAAR MILLIONEN JUDEN TRENNEN BRINGT NICHTS MEHR SIND ZU PERVERS ALSO ES GING ALSO GESTERN IM SINNE DER NACHT DARUM DAS ROTHSHILD EINE ENTSCHÄDIGUNG AN MICH ZAHLEN SOLLTE ER PRALTE DAMIT DAS DIE SEHR HOCH SEIN WÜRDE UND FÜHLTE SICH AUS DEM SCHNEIDER UND MIT GELD KANN ICH ALLES GESICHT ZOG AUF ICH LEHNTE DIE ENTZSCHÄDIGUNG AB UND SAGTE MIT GELD KANN MANN NICHT ALLES KAUFEN MEHRERE ANWESENDE SAGTEN ENDLICH MAL ICH HABE DARAUF JAHRZEHNTE GEWARTET EIN ANDERER MANN SAGTE DER HAT WAS SIE NICHT HABEN CHARAKTER IM ENDEFEKT GAB ES NOCH EIN GEMENGE MIT VERHAFTUNGEN VON VERSCHIEDENEN DOPPELGÄNGERN ICH SACKTE DANN WEG WEIL DIE HIRN FREQUENZEN DIE DAS US MILITÄR VERWENDET MIT UNTER DICH LAHMLEGEN KÖNNEN EINES WEIẞ ICH NOCH EIN SCHWARZER MERCEDES MIT JUDEN PROMINENZ WURDE VON ZWEI PANZERN EINER VORNE EINER HINTEN ZERMALEN FLUCHT VERSUCHE AUF ASTRALER EBENE WURDEN VERHINDERT DAS SOGENANNTE SPRINGEN DER PROFIS WENN DER GERADE BENUTZE KÖRPER ZERSTÖRT WURDE ABGEFANGEN DURCH MIR UNBEKANNTE WESEN DIE ZU SCHWEBEN SCHIENEN KLINGT ALLES EIN WENIG KOMISCH IST ABER SO ERLEBT WORDEN DAS GANZE FAND IM WENDE HAMMER DER 100 METER ENTFERNTEN GRUNDSCHULE STATT SO NUN ZU HEUTE ICH HATTE SCHWERE SCHMERZEN GESTERN ABEND UND IN DER NACHT ICH WURDE WÄHREND ICH SCHLIEF AM MEINEN KAPUTEN ARM GEDREHT UND MEIN KÖRPER SO VERDREHT DAS ER MEINE VERSCHLEIẞ STELLEN AUF KNOCHEN AUF KNOCHEN LAG UNTER EINSATZ VON BEDEUBUNGS GAS HAT SICH DER JUDE WIEDER MAL AN MEINEN SCHMERZEN ERGÖTZT ABER GEDULD ICH ERGÖTZE MICH AUCH NOCH AN EUREN SCHMERZEN UND DAS EWIGLICH GEGEN MITTAG BIN ICH ZUR TANKE TABAK KAUFEN ÜBERALL ROTHSCHILD MARIONETTEN UND ICH DENKE VERFASSUNGS SCHUTZ DA DAS PENTAGON MICH JA ALS DER KOPF DES TIEFEN STAATES ALS PRELL BOCK INSTALLIERT HAT SO EIN ROTHSCHILD ARSCH MIT GOLD BRILLE EINER DER PERVERSESTEN DEN ICH KENNE MIT STAHLEN WAFFE IM GEBÜSCH DAS SIND NUR NOCH PERVERSE SATANISTEN KÖNNEN WEG UND KOMMEN AUCH WEG MEIN KÖRPERLICHER ZUSTAND IST KASTASTROPHAL KEINE LUFT BEKOMME ICH KNOCHEN UND GELENKSCHMERZEN ZUM GLÜCK BIN ICH UNTERWEGS NICHT ABGESCHMIERT ICH KANN NICHTS MEHR ESSEN UND MIR IST PERMANENT ÜBEL
    AUF IN DEN KAMPF BIS DIE SCHWARTE KRACHT PATRIOTEN
    BIS MORGEN SO GOTT WILL UND GNADE HAT
    Actions GERMANY REPORT EATING NRW DEN 22.9. 2019 TIME 6 PM 30 MIN GERMANY EATING NRW STEEL BERGMANN field " SMALL ISTANBUL "START OF NO GO ZONE REPORT 22.09.2019 LIVING AFTER FUSE! OK! to 1) (TRUTH OR NOT TRUTH CONDITION BY TRANCE OF THE ILLUMINATI THE FREEMASON SATANIST SECRET ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY INFLUENCE OF YESTERDAY I WILL NOW LIKE I WILL BE DEALED AND HOW IN THE BORDERS INFORMATION OR DECISIONS I NEVER HAD TAKEN OUT OF ME YOU WILL USE GAS FOR IT I COULD SEE THE BOTTLE AND PEOPLE WITH GAS MASKS THE PERVERSE JEWS TRAIL GOING ON THE WORLD SHOULD GO FROM THE COUNTRY MILLIONS JEWS DO NOT BRING ANYTHING TO PERVERS SO THAT WAS SO YESTERIOR WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE NIGHT THEN THE ROTHSHILD PAY A COMPENSATION TO ME HE SHOULD PRELTE THAT THAT WOULD BE VERY HIGH AND FEELED OUT OF THE CUTTER AND WITH MONEY I CAN ALL FACE TALKED TO I DISCLAIMED THE DEFAMINATION AND SAID WITH MONEY CAN NOT BUY ANYTHING MULTIPLE PRESENTER WAS FINALLY TOLD I HAVE WAITED IT FOR YEARS ANOTHER MAN SAID WHAT YOU HAVE NOT HAVE CHARACTER IN THE END FACT THERE WAS STILL A TIME WITH DAMAGES OF DIFFERENT DOUBLE DEALERS I SOAKED OFF BECAUSE THE BRAIN FREQUENCIES USED THE US MILITARY MI T HE UNDERSTANDING YOU CAN BECOME A WHITE STILL A BLACK MERCEDES WITH JEWS PROMINENCE WAS PREVENTED BY TWO PANZARS ON A FRONT OF A REAL CENTRAL FLIGHT AT ASTRAL LEVEL HAS PREVENTED THE SOLE JUMPING OF PROFESSIONALS IF THE JUST USED BODY WAS DESTROYED BY ME UNKNOWN BEING THE TO FLOAT RAILS PLAY EVERYTHING LITTLE COMMON IS BUT SO EXPERIENCED THE WHOLE FUND IN TURNING HAMMER OF 100 METERS REMOVED PRIMARY SCHOOL INSTEAD OF SO NOW TO TODAY I HAD SERIOUS PAINTERS EVERY NIGHT AND IN THE NIGHT I WAS WHILE I SLIPPED AT MY CAPS ARM TURNED AND MY BODY THUS BREAKS THE HE MY GARMENTS ON BONES ON BONES LAG UNDER USE OF DEVICES GAS THE JUDE AGAIN AGAIN MY PAIN DEATHED BUT PATIENCE I ALSO STILL HURT TO YOUR PAIN AND THE ETERNAL AGAINST LUNCH I AM TO TANK TOBACCO SHOPPING EVERYWHERE ROTHSCHILD MARIONETTES AND I THINK CONSTITUTION PROTECTION THAT THE PENTAGO N ME AS THE HEAD OF THE DEEP STATE INSTEADED AS PRELL BOCK SO HAS A ROTHSCHILD ASS WITH GOLD GLASSES ONE OF THE PERVERSES THAT I KNOW WITH STEEL WEAPON IN THE BUSHET THAT CAN ONLY PERVERSE SATANISTS OFF AND WILL ALSO COME AWAY MY BODY CONDITION IS NOT A CHESTASTROPHAL I GET BOMBING AND JUMPING PAIN FOR LUCK I AM NOT LUBRICATED ON THE MOVE I CAN NOT EAT ANY MORE AND ME IS PERFECTLY EVIL ON THE BATTLE TO THE NICE CROSS PATRIOTS UNTIL TOMORROW SO GOD WANTS AND GRACE HAS Aktionen DEUTSCHLAND BERICHT ESSEN NRW DEN 22.09. 2019 ZEIT 18 UHR 30 MIN DEUTSCHLAND ESSEN NRW STAHL BERGMANN Feld " KLEINE ISTANBUL" ANFANG EINER NO GO ZONE BERICHT 22.09.2019 lebendige NACH SICHERUNG! OK! zu 1) (WAHRHEIT ODER NICHT WAHRHEITSBEDINGUNG DURCH TRANCE DER ILLUMINATI DER FREIMAURER-SATANISTEN-SECRET-ISLAM SCIENTOLOGY BEEINFLUSSUNG VON GESTERN ICH WEIẞ JETZT WIE ICH BETÄBT WERDE UND WIE IM GRENZBEREICH INFORMATIONEN ODER ENTSCHEIDUNGEN DIE ICH NIE GETROFFEN HÄTTE AUS MIR RAUSGEHOLT WERDEN SIE BENUTZEN GAS DAFÜR ICH KONNTE DIE FLASCHE SEHEN UND PERSONEN MIT GAS MASKEN DER PERVERSE JUDEN TRAIL GEHT WEITER DIE WELT SOLLTE SICH VON DEN PAAR MILLIONEN JUDEN TRENNEN BRINGT NICHTS MEHR SIND ZU PERVERS ALSO ES GING ALSO GESTERN IM SINNE DER NACHT DARUM DAS ROTHSHILD EINE ENTSCHÄDIGUNG AN MICH ZAHLEN SOLLTE ER PRALTE DAMIT DAS DIE SEHR HOCH SEIN WÜRDE UND FÜHLTE SICH AUS DEM SCHNEIDER UND MIT GELD KANN ICH ALLES GESICHT ZOG AUF ICH LEHNTE DIE ENTZSCHÄDIGUNG AB UND SAGTE MIT GELD KANN MANN NICHT ALLES KAUFEN MEHRERE ANWESENDE SAGTEN ENDLICH MAL ICH HABE DARAUF JAHRZEHNTE GEWARTET EIN ANDERER MANN SAGTE DER HAT WAS SIE NICHT HABEN CHARAKTER IM ENDEFEKT GAB ES NOCH EIN GEMENGE MIT VERHAFTUNGEN VON VERSCHIEDENEN DOPPELGÄNGERN ICH SACKTE DANN WEG WEIL DIE HIRN FREQUENZEN DIE DAS US MILITÄR VERWENDET MIT UNTER DICH LAHMLEGEN KÖNNEN EINES WEIẞ ICH NOCH EIN SCHWARZER MERCEDES MIT JUDEN PROMINENZ WURDE VON ZWEI PANZERN EINER VORNE EINER HINTEN ZERMALEN FLUCHT VERSUCHE AUF ASTRALER EBENE WURDEN VERHINDERT DAS SOGENANNTE SPRINGEN DER PROFIS WENN DER GERADE BENUTZE KÖRPER ZERSTÖRT WURDE ABGEFANGEN DURCH MIR UNBEKANNTE WESEN DIE ZU SCHWEBEN SCHIENEN KLINGT ALLES EIN WENIG KOMISCH IST ABER SO ERLEBT WORDEN DAS GANZE FAND IM WENDE HAMMER DER 100 METER ENTFERNTEN GRUNDSCHULE STATT SO NUN ZU HEUTE ICH HATTE SCHWERE SCHMERZEN GESTERN ABEND UND IN DER NACHT ICH WURDE WÄHREND ICH SCHLIEF AM MEINEN KAPUTEN ARM GEDREHT UND MEIN KÖRPER SO VERDREHT DAS ER MEINE VERSCHLEIẞ STELLEN AUF KNOCHEN AUF KNOCHEN LAG UNTER EINSATZ VON BEDEUBUNGS GAS HAT SICH DER JUDE WIEDER MAL AN MEINEN SCHMERZEN ERGÖTZT ABER GEDULD ICH ERGÖTZE MICH AUCH NOCH AN EUREN SCHMERZEN UND DAS EWIGLICH GEGEN MITTAG BIN ICH ZUR TANKE TABAK KAUFEN ÜBERALL ROTHSCHILD MARIONETTEN UND ICH DENKE VERFASSUNGS SCHUTZ DA DAS PENTAGON MICH JA ALS DER KOPF DES TIEFEN STAATES ALS PRELL BOCK INSTALLIERT HAT SO EIN ROTHSCHILD ARSCH MIT GOLD BRILLE EINER DER PERVERSESTEN DEN ICH KENNE MIT STAHLEN WAFFE IM GEBÜSCH DAS SIND NUR NOCH PERVERSE SATANISTEN KÖNNEN WEG UND KOMMEN AUCH WEG MEIN KÖRPERLICHER ZUSTAND IST KASTASTROPHAL KEINE LUFT BEKOMME ICH KNOCHEN UND GELENKSCHMERZEN ZUM GLÜCK BIN ICH UNTERWEGS NICHT ABGESCHMIERT ICH KANN NICHTS MEHR ESSEN UND MIR IST PERMANENT ÜBEL AUF IN DEN KAMPF BIS DIE SCHWARTE KRACHT PATRIOTEN BIS MORGEN SO GOTT WILL UND GNADE HAT
    0 Comments 1 Shares
  • A slow slip event in the pacific north west, bad news for the west coast.
    https://youtu.be/duWxvU6a5Ak
    A slow slip event in the pacific north west, bad news for the west coast. https://youtu.be/duWxvU6a5Ak
    A Major Slow-Slip Seismic Event Under Way In Pacific Northwest, Increases 'Big Quake' Risk
    A major seismic event is underway, and scientists at the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network are saying the Puget Sound could be at a higher risk for earthquak...
    YouTube
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • On the Malicious and Scientifically Illiterate Bullies Afraid of Greta Thunberg
    https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/09/02/malicious-and-scientifically-illiterate-bullies-afraid-greta-thunberg
    Andrew Mitrovica

    It was, in a subtle way, a defining moment.

    After a 15-day trek across the Atlantic Ocean, Thunberg looked exhausted. Still, the 16-year-old climate change activist knew she had to talk about the meaning and purpose of her unorthodox journey with supporters who greeted her on an overcast New York shoreline.

    Predictably, the tired, petite Swedish schoolgirl faltered, losing her train of thought briefly before apologising. "I'm sorry," she said, "my brain is not working correctly."

    The crowd applauded. Energised by the encouragement, Thunberg finished her short speech, where she urged the rest of us to "work together, despite our differences" to avert "the biggest crisis humanity has faced … because, otherwise, it might be too late. Let's not wait any longer. Let's do it now."

    For me, that distinctly human moment crystalised the appeal of Thunberg—a young woman who, distressed at the world's inexorable destruction, was moved to do something about it. Alone, if necessary.

    In words and deeds, Thunberg is the embodiment of philosopher Howard Zinn's admonition: "We don't have to engage in grand, heroic actions to participate in the process of change. Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can quietly become a power no government can suppress, a power that can transform the world."

    She disdains celebrity. She makes no claim to heroism. She rebuffs efforts to idolise her. She isn't calculating or preoccupied with fame or ego. There is no artifice about her. She speaks plainly, without affectation or embroidery.

    In words and deeds, Thunberg is the embodiment of philosopher Howard Zinn's admonition: "We don't have to engage in grand, heroic actions to participate in the process of change. Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can quietly become a power no government can suppress, a power that can transform the world."

    Of course, the marauding swarm of vitriolic right-wing climate-change deniers see Thunberg—not how the prophetic Zinn envisioned her—but as a tiny, pretentious zealot who threatens the existing order. Their order. Their comforts. Their traditional "way of life".

    De rigueur, they have set out to discredit and, if possible, to destroy Thunberg with their, by now, familiar and crass modus operandi.

    They have mocked her. They have belittled her. They have denigrated her. They have insulted her. They have dismissed her. They have questioned her motives. They have suggested she is anti-democratic. They have, in the fetid recesses of the internet, even threatened her.

    To afford all their fuming, sophomoric attacks the imprimatur of seriousness, they insist—as they always do—that they are the implacable realists, who, unlike starry-eyed leftists, aren't duped by the media's veneration of a youngster peddling doom and gloom over the supposedly still-contested science about whether the end is nigh or not.

    They would, no doubt, recoil at any suggestion that their furious hostility towards Thunberg is also the product of a calcifying cynicism, seething malevolence or signature cruelty.

    Rather, they insist, it is an expression of their necessary role as sceptics or contrarians in the noble tradition of their philosophical patron saint in name only, Galileo, who also questioned the prevailing scientific orthodoxy.

    It is a lie and an insult. They aren't "sceptics" or "contrarians". They are scientifically illiterate bullies who amplify their malice and ignorance with a bullhorn on TV or keyboard on Twitter.

    They share no intellectual affinity with Galileo. None. Bereft of an argument that could remotely be considered empirically or rationally sound, they traffic in hyperbole and smears designed to pummel Thunberg into an inconsequential afterthought.

    The teenage revolutionary must be stopped before the climate revolution she leads goes beyond their ability to halt it.

    Consider what the Australian columnist, Andrew Bolt, had to say about her.

    "No teenager is more freakishly influential than Thunberg, the deeply disturbed messiah of the global warming movement," he wrote. "I have never seen a girl so young and with so many mental disorders treated by so many adults as a guru."

    Not done calling her a freak and disturbed, Bolt invoked Thunberg's reported past eating disorder, emotional and psychological struggles and autism as a cudgel against her.

    I defer to psychologists to discern the pathology that would prompt such viciousness. But Bolt's fear of the Thunberg phenomenon is plain. She is prevailing. He is losing. She is being heard, while he shouts obscenities. She grows more relevant by the day, while he slips further into irrelevancy and hysteria.

    When the predictable character assassination of a teenager gambit fails, it's time to raise "questions" about who or what powerful forces may be acting as Svengalis exploiting a vulnerable, damaged "child" for their parochial aims and possible profit.

    "Is Thunberg a green prophet or a schoolgirl puppet controlled by more sinister forces behind her?" the always temperate London-based The Sun newspaper asked, rhetorically.

    Using innuendo and recycled drivel, The Sun claimed a "naive" Thunberg was being manipulated by her "fame-hungry" mother and "energy giants".

    Like the paper itself, it is all empty conjecture designed to undermine Thunberg's legitimacy and authenticity and her just cause. It will not work because, clearly, she is no one's marionette.

    The irrational, absurd assaults on Thunberg's personality and motives aren't the exclusive preserve of the rancid tabloid press.

    Indeed, The New York Times newspaper permitted one journalist, Christopher Caldwell, to argue that Thunberg's appeals for immediate action are, incredibly, "in conflict with democracy".

    "Ms Thunberg believes that we should act, not argue," Caldwell wrote in his missive, oozing with condescension about her lack of life experience, "crude language", "unrealistic" world view, and "out of balance" priorities.

    While simultaneously acknowledging that the "authorities" agree with Thunberg that the climate crisis constitutes an "emergency", Caldwell claims that the youthful Swede is only interested in "sowing panic" and "simplification".

    His cockeyed prescription: more patience. "Democracy calls for waiting and seeing."

    [Thunberg] is the personification of the democratic impulse, not the antithesis of it.
    This is climate change denialism with the patina of gravitas.

    Thunberg, like the overwhelming scientific consensus she is intimately familiar with, is loud and clear on this urgent imperative: The time for waiting and seeing was over long ago.

    Patience, in this pressing context, is not a virtue, it is an abdication of responsibility.

    Thunberg has deployed every democratic tool at her imaginative disposal to make this salient point again and again. She is the personification of the democratic impulse, not the antithesis of it.

    So, I join millions of other global citizens who have been humbled, inspired and stirred by Thunberg's steely steadfastness in the face of the often-repellent locusts who come to bury her, not to praise her.

    Here's looking at you, kid.
    On the Malicious and Scientifically Illiterate Bullies Afraid of Greta Thunberg https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/09/02/malicious-and-scientifically-illiterate-bullies-afraid-greta-thunberg Andrew Mitrovica It was, in a subtle way, a defining moment. After a 15-day trek across the Atlantic Ocean, Thunberg looked exhausted. Still, the 16-year-old climate change activist knew she had to talk about the meaning and purpose of her unorthodox journey with supporters who greeted her on an overcast New York shoreline. Predictably, the tired, petite Swedish schoolgirl faltered, losing her train of thought briefly before apologising. "I'm sorry," she said, "my brain is not working correctly." The crowd applauded. Energised by the encouragement, Thunberg finished her short speech, where she urged the rest of us to "work together, despite our differences" to avert "the biggest crisis humanity has faced … because, otherwise, it might be too late. Let's not wait any longer. Let's do it now." For me, that distinctly human moment crystalised the appeal of Thunberg—a young woman who, distressed at the world's inexorable destruction, was moved to do something about it. Alone, if necessary. In words and deeds, Thunberg is the embodiment of philosopher Howard Zinn's admonition: "We don't have to engage in grand, heroic actions to participate in the process of change. Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can quietly become a power no government can suppress, a power that can transform the world." She disdains celebrity. She makes no claim to heroism. She rebuffs efforts to idolise her. She isn't calculating or preoccupied with fame or ego. There is no artifice about her. She speaks plainly, without affectation or embroidery. In words and deeds, Thunberg is the embodiment of philosopher Howard Zinn's admonition: "We don't have to engage in grand, heroic actions to participate in the process of change. Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can quietly become a power no government can suppress, a power that can transform the world." Of course, the marauding swarm of vitriolic right-wing climate-change deniers see Thunberg—not how the prophetic Zinn envisioned her—but as a tiny, pretentious zealot who threatens the existing order. Their order. Their comforts. Their traditional "way of life". De rigueur, they have set out to discredit and, if possible, to destroy Thunberg with their, by now, familiar and crass modus operandi. They have mocked her. They have belittled her. They have denigrated her. They have insulted her. They have dismissed her. They have questioned her motives. They have suggested she is anti-democratic. They have, in the fetid recesses of the internet, even threatened her. To afford all their fuming, sophomoric attacks the imprimatur of seriousness, they insist—as they always do—that they are the implacable realists, who, unlike starry-eyed leftists, aren't duped by the media's veneration of a youngster peddling doom and gloom over the supposedly still-contested science about whether the end is nigh or not. They would, no doubt, recoil at any suggestion that their furious hostility towards Thunberg is also the product of a calcifying cynicism, seething malevolence or signature cruelty. Rather, they insist, it is an expression of their necessary role as sceptics or contrarians in the noble tradition of their philosophical patron saint in name only, Galileo, who also questioned the prevailing scientific orthodoxy. It is a lie and an insult. They aren't "sceptics" or "contrarians". They are scientifically illiterate bullies who amplify their malice and ignorance with a bullhorn on TV or keyboard on Twitter. They share no intellectual affinity with Galileo. None. Bereft of an argument that could remotely be considered empirically or rationally sound, they traffic in hyperbole and smears designed to pummel Thunberg into an inconsequential afterthought. The teenage revolutionary must be stopped before the climate revolution she leads goes beyond their ability to halt it. Consider what the Australian columnist, Andrew Bolt, had to say about her. "No teenager is more freakishly influential than Thunberg, the deeply disturbed messiah of the global warming movement," he wrote. "I have never seen a girl so young and with so many mental disorders treated by so many adults as a guru." Not done calling her a freak and disturbed, Bolt invoked Thunberg's reported past eating disorder, emotional and psychological struggles and autism as a cudgel against her. I defer to psychologists to discern the pathology that would prompt such viciousness. But Bolt's fear of the Thunberg phenomenon is plain. She is prevailing. He is losing. She is being heard, while he shouts obscenities. She grows more relevant by the day, while he slips further into irrelevancy and hysteria. When the predictable character assassination of a teenager gambit fails, it's time to raise "questions" about who or what powerful forces may be acting as Svengalis exploiting a vulnerable, damaged "child" for their parochial aims and possible profit. "Is Thunberg a green prophet or a schoolgirl puppet controlled by more sinister forces behind her?" the always temperate London-based The Sun newspaper asked, rhetorically. Using innuendo and recycled drivel, The Sun claimed a "naive" Thunberg was being manipulated by her "fame-hungry" mother and "energy giants". Like the paper itself, it is all empty conjecture designed to undermine Thunberg's legitimacy and authenticity and her just cause. It will not work because, clearly, she is no one's marionette. The irrational, absurd assaults on Thunberg's personality and motives aren't the exclusive preserve of the rancid tabloid press. Indeed, The New York Times newspaper permitted one journalist, Christopher Caldwell, to argue that Thunberg's appeals for immediate action are, incredibly, "in conflict with democracy". "Ms Thunberg believes that we should act, not argue," Caldwell wrote in his missive, oozing with condescension about her lack of life experience, "crude language", "unrealistic" world view, and "out of balance" priorities. While simultaneously acknowledging that the "authorities" agree with Thunberg that the climate crisis constitutes an "emergency", Caldwell claims that the youthful Swede is only interested in "sowing panic" and "simplification". His cockeyed prescription: more patience. "Democracy calls for waiting and seeing." [Thunberg] is the personification of the democratic impulse, not the antithesis of it. This is climate change denialism with the patina of gravitas. Thunberg, like the overwhelming scientific consensus she is intimately familiar with, is loud and clear on this urgent imperative: The time for waiting and seeing was over long ago. Patience, in this pressing context, is not a virtue, it is an abdication of responsibility. Thunberg has deployed every democratic tool at her imaginative disposal to make this salient point again and again. She is the personification of the democratic impulse, not the antithesis of it. So, I join millions of other global citizens who have been humbled, inspired and stirred by Thunberg's steely steadfastness in the face of the often-repellent locusts who come to bury her, not to praise her. Here's looking at you, kid.
    On the Malicious and Scientifically Illiterate Bullies Afraid of Greta Thunberg
    As the world starts to take note of the teen climate activist, her critics have launched increasingly personal attacks... It was, in a subtle way, a defining moment.After a 15-day trek across the Atlantic Ocean, Thunberg looked exhausted. Still, the 16-year-old climate change activist knew she had to talk about the meaning and purpose of her unorthodox journey with supporters who greeted her on an overcast New York shoreline.
    WWW.COMMONDREAMS.ORG
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Worst Dread
    September 1 No real harm befalls the Godly, but the wicked have their fill of trouble. Proverbs 12:21 NLT

    What’s your worst dread? No fear can match the “real harm” of demonic torment. God promises to spare us that ultimate horror as we walk under His rulership. But the promise has a reverse side. Come out from under God’s covering, and misery displaces peace and joy.


    Samson was mighty as long as he was obedient to God. But when he rebelled, there was an accelerating descent into trouble: he slipped, he was knocked down and finally knocked out. Walk under Christ’s Lordship and Satan has no authority to harm you. https://mailchi.mp/7c9ca73a89a6/the-truest-freedom-you-can-ever-experience-452917?e=9cbe669f39
    Worst Dread September 1 No real harm befalls the Godly, but the wicked have their fill of trouble. Proverbs 12:21 NLT What’s your worst dread? No fear can match the “real harm” of demonic torment. God promises to spare us that ultimate horror as we walk under His rulership. But the promise has a reverse side. Come out from under God’s covering, and misery displaces peace and joy. Samson was mighty as long as he was obedient to God. But when he rebelled, there was an accelerating descent into trouble: he slipped, he was knocked down and finally knocked out. Walk under Christ’s Lordship and Satan has no authority to harm you. https://mailchi.mp/7c9ca73a89a6/the-truest-freedom-you-can-ever-experience-452917?e=9cbe669f39
    Worst Dread
    God promises to spare us that ultimate horror as we walk under His rulership.
    MAILCHI.MP
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Relentless Love
    August 31 For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 8:38-39


    A pilot is shot down, and lands his fighter jet in the ocean. He is knocked out. The airplane is sinking as a carrier-based helicopter approaches. The rescue team leaps into the sea, and slips a harness around the unconscious pilot. He is lifted into the safety of the helicopter. Though he is out cold and cannot hold onto the harness, the harness holds onto him. God’s love is so relentless that when we are battered by foes seen and unseen, and have difficulty holding on to Him, He grips us tenaciously.

    The beautiful thing about Jesus is that He doesn’t say, ‘I’m going to join you on the second mile and walk with you.’ He joins us from the very first step we take for Him. He walks with us on that first mile - and every step of the way after that. https://mailchi.mp/b90ea5d6839a/the-truest-freedom-you-can-ever-experience-452913?e=9cbe669f39
    Relentless Love August 31 For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 8:38-39 A pilot is shot down, and lands his fighter jet in the ocean. He is knocked out. The airplane is sinking as a carrier-based helicopter approaches. The rescue team leaps into the sea, and slips a harness around the unconscious pilot. He is lifted into the safety of the helicopter. Though he is out cold and cannot hold onto the harness, the harness holds onto him. God’s love is so relentless that when we are battered by foes seen and unseen, and have difficulty holding on to Him, He grips us tenaciously. The beautiful thing about Jesus is that He doesn’t say, ‘I’m going to join you on the second mile and walk with you.’ He joins us from the very first step we take for Him. He walks with us on that first mile - and every step of the way after that. https://mailchi.mp/b90ea5d6839a/the-truest-freedom-you-can-ever-experience-452913?e=9cbe669f39
    Relentless Love
    He grips us tenaciously.
    MAILCHI.MP
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • "Demographic change can happen very fast. Twenty-six of the counties that were majority white in 2000 were at least 60% white, and they say that these days whites are 60% of America’s population.

    Twenty years from now, America could be 30% white  — or worse, considering how things are accelerating and how everyone’s slipping in the degeneration slope." - Pomidor Quixote

    https://dailystormer.name/109-us-counties-have-become-majority-nonwhite-since-2000-only-2-went-from-minority-to-majority-white/
    "Demographic change can happen very fast. Twenty-six of the counties that were majority white in 2000 were at least 60% white, and they say that these days whites are 60% of America’s population. Twenty years from now, America could be 30% white  — or worse, considering how things are accelerating and how everyone’s slipping in the degeneration slope." - Pomidor Quixote https://dailystormer.name/109-us-counties-have-become-majority-nonwhite-since-2000-only-2-went-from-minority-to-majority-white/
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The Trump Administration’s Assault on Fair Housing
    https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/08/24/trump-administrations-assault-fair-housing
    Olatunde Johnson, Michelle Aronowitz

    This week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a proposed rule that would substantially limit enforcement of the 1968 Fair Housing Act, whose purpose is to provide for fair housing throughout the United States.

    The re-reading of the Fair Housing Act urged by the President and his Cabinet Secretary Ben Carson appears to eliminate the possibility of challenging systemic discrimination—which is often subtle and embedded in government and industry practices—and risks deepening patterns of segregation and racial wealth disparities.

    The proposal would gut the core of the Act’s disparate impact method of proof. This is despite the Supreme Court’s affirmance of this approach in a 2015 decision authored by Justice Kennedy in Texas Dep’t of Housing & Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project (ICP).

    The disparate impact method of proof has been used to challenge loan practices that exclude or charge higher prices to minorities or target them for subprime loans; it has also been used to address practices that displace minority communities to further gentrification and to combat discriminatory zoning practices that exclude minorities from majority-white communities.

    The proposal "risks deepening patterns of segregation and racial wealth disparities." An example of disparate impact involves a challenge to actions taken by St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, a majority-white community outside of New Orleans, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The parish had adopted a number of measures to prevent blacks displaced by the Hurricane from relocating to the Parish. One such measure was a “blood relative ordinance,” which prohibited rentals to those without blood ties to existing St. Bernard Parish residents. A court ruled that the Parish’s actions violated the Fair Housing Act under intent and impact theories, and Justice Kennedy in ICP cited this case in making clear that the Act reached disparate impact claims.

    The single question presented in ICP was whether the statute permits disparate impact claims. The Court therefore did not decide what standard should be used to analyze those claims.

    HUD’s current disparate impact rule, adopted in 2013 by the Obama administration after an extensive regulatory process, formalizes the longstanding understanding that the Act prohibits policies and practices by the housing industry that cause segregation or adverse disparate effects on protected groups, and that lack sufficient justification.

    The 2013 rule applies the traditional three-step burden shifting approach for proving disparate impact claims, embodied in other civil rights statutes such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (employment discrimination). The Title VII disparate impact standard was codified by statute in 1991, and the current HUD standard aligns closely with that. As in employment, HUD’s 2013 rule made clear that a statistical disparity alone is not enough to prove disparate impact discrimination under the Fair Housing Act.

    The Trump Administration’s proposed rule would tear through that careful structure by piling on new requirements for plaintiffs and creating broad defenses for the housing industry.

    First, HUD’s proposal perverts the concept of a prima facie case by incorporating the defendant’s rebuttal into the plaintiff’s prima facie case. Traditionally, if the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case and the defendant fails to rebut, the plaintiff prevails.

    Under the new rule, in order to prevail, the plaintiff is expected to establish its affirmative case as well as prove the negative – that no rebuttal is possible. In other words, as part of the prima facie case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant has no “valid interest or legitimate objective” in the challenged practice.

    These unusual standards are incorporated into the proposed rule’s novel five-factor test for establishing a prima facie case. Not only does the defendant have no burden to prove a valid interest to rebut the prima facie case (although it can elect to submit evidence if it would like), it is afforded two entirely new, extremely broad defenses that shield it from liability.

    The first of the two defenses operates almost like a preemption doctrine rather than how it is described in the preamble – as a rebuttal of plaintiff’s causation requirement. The proposed rule gives the defendant a complete defense to a disparate impact claim if it can show its discretion is “materially limited” by federal, state or local law, or by a “binding or controlling court, arbitral, regulatory, administrative order, or administrative requirement.”

    The Trump administration’s “following orders” defense flies in the face of the core purpose of the Fair Housing Act – which is to dismantle segregation and eradicate barriers to equal housing opportunity – be they intentionally imposed or inadvertent yet unnecessary, and whether established at the local, state or federal level, or by private corporate interests.

    The second defense to a prima facie case is available to defendants who use algorithms or other models in making their housing decisions; but it operates more like an exemption for most if not all of the financial services industry – namely mortgage banking and homeowners insurance.

    For instance, it makes disparate impact challenges to underwriting decisions unenforceable if the model is the industry standard, or if the model predicts for risk or some other valid objective and none of the factors in the model are intentionally discriminatory (i.e., are “substitutes or close proxies for” a protected group).

    The effect of this defense is to exempt from the Act those industries that denied or limited black access to the wealth generating capital available to many Americans, regardless of class. More recently in cities like Baltimore, banks sought out black and brown communities to provide them inferior loans. Nationally, black communities still have not recovered the wealth lost during the financial crises.

    Between the unusually stringent and likely never to be satisfied prima facie case, and the two all-encompassing and easy to satisfy defenses, the proposed rule appears to use a belt and suspenders approach geared to ensure no effects case slips through. If the rule is finalized, it is likely to be challenged in court. It will then be to challengers to show a court that the Trump administration’s interpretation distorts the meaning of the 1968 Fair Housing Act and undermines both congressional and judicial authority.
    The Trump Administration’s Assault on Fair Housing https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/08/24/trump-administrations-assault-fair-housing Olatunde Johnson, Michelle Aronowitz This week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a proposed rule that would substantially limit enforcement of the 1968 Fair Housing Act, whose purpose is to provide for fair housing throughout the United States. The re-reading of the Fair Housing Act urged by the President and his Cabinet Secretary Ben Carson appears to eliminate the possibility of challenging systemic discrimination—which is often subtle and embedded in government and industry practices—and risks deepening patterns of segregation and racial wealth disparities. The proposal would gut the core of the Act’s disparate impact method of proof. This is despite the Supreme Court’s affirmance of this approach in a 2015 decision authored by Justice Kennedy in Texas Dep’t of Housing & Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project (ICP). The disparate impact method of proof has been used to challenge loan practices that exclude or charge higher prices to minorities or target them for subprime loans; it has also been used to address practices that displace minority communities to further gentrification and to combat discriminatory zoning practices that exclude minorities from majority-white communities. The proposal "risks deepening patterns of segregation and racial wealth disparities." An example of disparate impact involves a challenge to actions taken by St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, a majority-white community outside of New Orleans, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The parish had adopted a number of measures to prevent blacks displaced by the Hurricane from relocating to the Parish. One such measure was a “blood relative ordinance,” which prohibited rentals to those without blood ties to existing St. Bernard Parish residents. A court ruled that the Parish’s actions violated the Fair Housing Act under intent and impact theories, and Justice Kennedy in ICP cited this case in making clear that the Act reached disparate impact claims. The single question presented in ICP was whether the statute permits disparate impact claims. The Court therefore did not decide what standard should be used to analyze those claims. HUD’s current disparate impact rule, adopted in 2013 by the Obama administration after an extensive regulatory process, formalizes the longstanding understanding that the Act prohibits policies and practices by the housing industry that cause segregation or adverse disparate effects on protected groups, and that lack sufficient justification. The 2013 rule applies the traditional three-step burden shifting approach for proving disparate impact claims, embodied in other civil rights statutes such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (employment discrimination). The Title VII disparate impact standard was codified by statute in 1991, and the current HUD standard aligns closely with that. As in employment, HUD’s 2013 rule made clear that a statistical disparity alone is not enough to prove disparate impact discrimination under the Fair Housing Act. The Trump Administration’s proposed rule would tear through that careful structure by piling on new requirements for plaintiffs and creating broad defenses for the housing industry. First, HUD’s proposal perverts the concept of a prima facie case by incorporating the defendant’s rebuttal into the plaintiff’s prima facie case. Traditionally, if the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case and the defendant fails to rebut, the plaintiff prevails. Under the new rule, in order to prevail, the plaintiff is expected to establish its affirmative case as well as prove the negative – that no rebuttal is possible. In other words, as part of the prima facie case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant has no “valid interest or legitimate objective” in the challenged practice. These unusual standards are incorporated into the proposed rule’s novel five-factor test for establishing a prima facie case. Not only does the defendant have no burden to prove a valid interest to rebut the prima facie case (although it can elect to submit evidence if it would like), it is afforded two entirely new, extremely broad defenses that shield it from liability. The first of the two defenses operates almost like a preemption doctrine rather than how it is described in the preamble – as a rebuttal of plaintiff’s causation requirement. The proposed rule gives the defendant a complete defense to a disparate impact claim if it can show its discretion is “materially limited” by federal, state or local law, or by a “binding or controlling court, arbitral, regulatory, administrative order, or administrative requirement.” The Trump administration’s “following orders” defense flies in the face of the core purpose of the Fair Housing Act – which is to dismantle segregation and eradicate barriers to equal housing opportunity – be they intentionally imposed or inadvertent yet unnecessary, and whether established at the local, state or federal level, or by private corporate interests. The second defense to a prima facie case is available to defendants who use algorithms or other models in making their housing decisions; but it operates more like an exemption for most if not all of the financial services industry – namely mortgage banking and homeowners insurance. For instance, it makes disparate impact challenges to underwriting decisions unenforceable if the model is the industry standard, or if the model predicts for risk or some other valid objective and none of the factors in the model are intentionally discriminatory (i.e., are “substitutes or close proxies for” a protected group). The effect of this defense is to exempt from the Act those industries that denied or limited black access to the wealth generating capital available to many Americans, regardless of class. More recently in cities like Baltimore, banks sought out black and brown communities to provide them inferior loans. Nationally, black communities still have not recovered the wealth lost during the financial crises. Between the unusually stringent and likely never to be satisfied prima facie case, and the two all-encompassing and easy to satisfy defenses, the proposed rule appears to use a belt and suspenders approach geared to ensure no effects case slips through. If the rule is finalized, it is likely to be challenged in court. It will then be to challengers to show a court that the Trump administration’s interpretation distorts the meaning of the 1968 Fair Housing Act and undermines both congressional and judicial authority.
    The Trump Administration’s Assault on Fair Housing
    The proposal would gut the core of the Fair Housing Act’s disparate impact method of proof... This week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a proposed rule that would substantially limit enforcement of the 1968 Fair Housing Act, whose purpose is to provide for fair housing throughout the United States.
    WWW.COMMONDREAMS.ORG
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares

No results to show

No results to show

No results to show

No results to show

Sponsored

Canadian Community Project INC.

Please help us by donating money for land thank you and may God Bless you all!